So if you have a slip and fall in a grocery store, you think you should have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the store is at fault? Sounds like a lot of victims of civil crimes are going to go without remedy under your system.
So you think civil cases should be proven beyond a reasonable doubt?
Do you think criminal and civil cases should be combined in one trial?
Do you understand the difference?
I don’t recall seeing anything about jury nullification in the court’s order. And not sure why you think jury nullification applies to the instant case.