Ok...it's my fault because I was taking for granted that you guys knew that a woman, before the medical procedure (whether it's through abortion pill or surgery) must (by law) undergo a psychological visit.
What could possibly be coercive?
You told us:
... regional governments will have the possibility (so it's not compulsory) to hire volunteers, that is pro-life associations professionals, that will try to assist the pregnant woman in the choice. They will not try to dissuade women from having an abortion. [emphasis added - JS]
We now hear:
The original law was meant to discourage abortion by pushing women to use as many contraceptive methods as possible, because the procedure is complex and not pleasant at all (I mean the psychological visit).
These pro-life associations, I guess, will push women to think again, and show them that they can give their baby for adoption. [emphasis added - JS]
So, is summary, these (presumably Catholic and presumably professional) pro-life associations
- will not try to dissuade, but
- will push women, reinforcing
- a mandatory psychological visit, which was already
- not pleasant at all
Again, what could possibly be coercive?