• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

'Bible-Only' Christians?

Status
Not open for further replies.

*Paul*

Jesus loves you
sAng_explosive.gif
THE CANON, YOU WIN THIS TIME VICTOR, THIS
sAng_explosive.gif
IS GONNA DRIVE ME MAD ALL NIGHT AGAIN NOW ON HOW I CAN DEFINE WHAT I KNOW TO BE TRUE.




god_is_love_md_clr.gif
 

bible truth

Active Member
What is a 'Bible-Only Christian'? Is it someone who ONLY adheres to the Bible? What about Luther and others? What about the various creeds, those are not a biblical source, so would anyone who adhered to those be considered a 'Bible-Only' Christian?












Note: I do not want scriptures thrown at me, I want your opinion of what a 'Bible-Only' Christian is. I will ignore any long-winded posts of multiple scriptures without a point. Thanks everyone! (Sorry if that sounded rude, but I'm trying to get a personal feel for this.)

Hi Beckysoup,
God commands us to test everything to see if they are from God. We are warned that there are many false prophets that have gone out into the world. What standard does God give His people to determine what is from Him? In Acts 17:11, the Bereans examined the Apostle Paul’s message and compared it with the Scriptures. That’s the heart of Sola Scripture. The Bible is the sole standard given to God to discern if doctrine is from God or from the enemy.

How do I know if Joseph Smith is a prophet from God? I examine his teachings in the light of Scripture alone.

How do I know if Peter was the first Pope and the Roman Catholic Church speaks for God? I examine the official teachings of the Roman Catholic Church with Scripture alone.

Do I test the writings of Christians throughout church history? If the Bereans tested the Apostle Paul, I believe God wants me to test all things that are proclaimed to be from Him with the Bible alone. I love biblical creeds and confessions! I love to read and study the writings of Christians throughout redemptive history.

1 Thessalonians 5 - Final Instructions of Paul
Do not put out the Spirit's fire; do not treat prophecies with contempt. Test everything. Hold on to the good. Avoid every kind of evil.

Acts 17:11
Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the Thessalonians, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true.

1 John 4 - Test the Spirits

Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world. This is how you can recognize the Spirit of God: Every spirit that acknowledges that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, but every spirit that does not acknowledge Jesus is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you have heard is coming and even now is already in the world.


You, dear children, are from God and have overcome them, because the one who is in you is greater than the one who is in the world. They are from the world and therefore speak from the viewpoint of the world, and the world listens to them. We are from God, and whoever knows God listens to us; but whoever is not from God does not listen to us. This is how we recognize the Spirit of truth and the spirit of falsehood.
2 Peter 2 - False Teachers and Their Destruction

But there were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord who bought them—bringing swift destruction on themselves. Many will follow their shameful ways and will bring the way of truth into disrepute. In their greed these teachers will exploit you with stories they have made up. Their condemnation has long been hanging over them, and their destruction has not been sleeping.

Hi Beckysoup,

Sola Scriptura is a battle for authority. Within Roman Catholicism, LDS Church, and Protestants, we have three distinct forms of final authorities.

1.Roman Catholic = Bible (+) sacred oral and written tradition. The Popes and bishops in communion with him determine sacred tradition. This is known as “Apostolic Succession”
2.LDS Church Authority = Book of Mormon, Doctrines and Covenants, Price of the Great Pear, and Bible. You also proclaim a line of prophets with final authority like “Apostolic Succession.
3.Protestant Christian = Final authority = Bible alone

Therefore, when we disagree with doctrine from God, who do we believe? Do we believe the Roman Catholic Church with their apostolic succession claim? Do we believe in the LDS church with their apostolic succession claim? Or, do we believe in the Bible? We are in a battle for authority in what God has revealed to mankind. I trust the Bible over apostolic succession of any organization. I have tested the official gospel of Roman Catholicism in the light of Scripture. Like the Protestant Reformers, I have found the official gospel of Rome to be false in the light of Scripture alone. I have also tested the LDS official gospel in the light of Scripture alone, I find it to be false too. I prefer trusting in the Bible as compared to a burning of the bosom.

I hope this helps,
BT
 

dawny0826

Mother Heathen
What is a 'Bible-Only Christian'? Is it someone who ONLY adheres to the Bible? What about Luther and others? What about the various creeds, those are not a biblical source, so would anyone who adhered to those be considered a 'Bible-Only' Christian?




Note: I do not want scriptures thrown at me, I want your opinion of what a 'Bible-Only' Christian is. I will ignore any long-winded posts of multiple scriptures without a point. Thanks everyone! (Sorry if that sounded rude, but I'm trying to get a personal feel for this.)

I consider myself a "bible-only" Christian as the Bible is my only Holy Book.

Any other study aid that I may use, a religious reference book, concordance, a spiritual study aid...are just that...aids.

The creeds are proclamations of my faith. I DO recite the creeds, my favorite being the Apostle's Creed as it fully details what I believe. Again, it's a proclamation of faith...faith that I have because of my knowledge and understanding of Jesus Christ through the Holy Bible.
 

bible truth

Active Member
It was never my intention to bash [any church]. I just try to speak the truth in love out of the command of the God that I know and serve. We should all be extremely passionate about our Faith if we believe them. When you asked this particular question on this Thread, I felt qualified to answer according to my convictions. - BT :)
 

Vassal

Member
I am not "bashing" anyone, I am merely stated the facts (what is written in the Bible vs. what is published on lds.org) to show what happens to religions without a Bible only stance, as an example of why I follow a Bible-Only stance.
 

Comprehend

Res Ipsa Loquitur
A "Bible only" Christian is a Christian whose entire set of beliefs can be found in the Bible, except when they're found elsewhere, like the Westminster Confession of Faith or the Nicene Creed. They're the ones who insist that everything God wants us to know is in the Bible. In other words, it's inerrant and complete. Oddly enough, though, they can't tell you were the Bible claims to be inerrant and complete. Multiple request for that same answer will get you no where, by the way. If a Bible only Christian tells you that the Bible is "self-authenticating," what he really means in that anything it says should be interpreted by all parties in exactly the same way. Those who may interpret it differently from the "Bible only" Christian are wrong.

LOL. awesome...
 

Comprehend

Res Ipsa Loquitur
LDS similarly downplay the Bible because many of their beliefs are contradictory to it.

yeah, we feel the need to downplay the bible so much that we study the bible exactly twice as much as the Book of Mormon. We spend two years on the bible for every one on the Book of Mormon. Also in the Articles of Faith, we mention the Bible first and the Book of Mormon is considered to be a companion to the Bible, not the other way around. The Book of Mormon is sub-titled "another testament of Jesus Christ".

Finally, our beliefs are not condradictory with the Bible, only with YOUR interpretations of the bible. We find that the bible and the book of Mormon work quite nicely together. So do a great number of other people around the world which is why the LDS church is growing so fast and main stream christianity is shrinking. :)
 

Mister Emu

Emu Extraordinaire
Staff member
Premium Member
*** Mod Post ***
Friendly reminder, this thread is specifically about what constitutes a follower of Sola Scriptura(Bible alone), not about the merits and/or failings, if any there be, of the doctrines of the Roman Catholic and Latter-Day Saint Churches.

If you have a concern/issue/problem/whatever with the doctrines of either the Roman Catholic or Latter-Day Saint Churches(or any other) feel free, and encouraged, to start a seperate thread.

Thank you
 

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
Hi

1.Roman Catholic = Bible (+) sacred oral and written tradition. The Popes and bishops in communion with him determine sacred tradition. This is known as “Apostolic Succession”
2.LDS Church Authority = Book of Mormon, Doctrines and Covenants, [deleted sarcasm], and Bible. You also proclaim a line of prophets with final authority like “Apostolic Succession.
3.Protestant Christian = Final authority = Bible alone

.


BT

Why do you insist on part truths.

The entire Anglican Communion probably the largest grouping of protestants in the world do not believe in Bible alone.

Lunamoth started this exceptional thread on the Anglican /Episcopalian beliefs. which make the Anglican faith absolutely clear.
It mentions that personal interpretation is permitted ... though not exactly encouraged.

(Sory Lunamoth that I did not take part, as I was off line at the time)

You can check the thread here
http://www.religiousforums.com/forum/showthread.php?t=39416
 

bible truth

Active Member
Why do you insist on part truths.

The entire Anglican Communion probably the largest grouping of protestants in the world do not believe in Bible alone.

Lunamoth started this exceptional thread on the Anglican /Episcopalian beliefs. which make the Anglican faith absolutely clear.
It mentions that personal interpretation is permitted ... though not exactly encouraged.

(Sory Lunamoth that I did not take part, as I was off line at the time)

You can check the thread here
http://www.religiousforums.com/forum/showthread.php?t=39416http://www.religiousforums.com/forum/showthread.php?t=39416

Okay my friend,

Where and how does God reveal Himself to fallen mankind? How did you determine this? - BT
 

jimbob

The Celt
Okay my friend,

Where and how does God reveal Himself to fallen mankind? How did you determine this? - BT


you're stubbornness is amazing.

and perhaps i'm reading this question wrong, but, are you serious? He revealed himself as Christ to a fallen mankind. We determine this because the Bible. what's your point?
 

bible truth

Active Member
you're stubbornness is amazing.

and perhaps i'm reading this question wrong, but, are you serious? He revealed himself as Christ to a fallen mankind. We determine this because the Bible. what's your point?

The Bible alone or other sources too?
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
The Bible alone or other sources too?

Is there something inherently wrong, or flawed about extra-biblical sources? What did they do for information before the Bible? What about information in the Bible that is clearly wrong? Mulitple attestation is only responsible scholarship and the the only truly compreshensive way to garner information.
 

Tigress

Working-Class W*nch.
Sola Scriptura is a battle for authority. Within Roman Catholicism, LDS Church, and Protestants, we have three distinct forms of final authorities.

1.Roman Catholic = Bible (+) sacred oral and written tradition. The Popes and bishops in communion with him determine sacred tradition. This is known as “Apostolic Succession”
2.LDS Church Authority = Book of Mormon, Doctrines and Covenants, Price of the Great Pear, and Bible. You also proclaim a line of prophets with final authority like “Apostolic Succession.
3.Protestant Christian = Final authority = Bible alone
The entire Anglican Communion probably the largest grouping of protestants in the world do not believe in Bible alone.

Just thought I'd mention that the Quakers are another Protestant group that isn't 'bible-only.'
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top