• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Derpy Donny's tariffs save the American consumer

Dan From Smithville

What we've got here is failure to communicate.
Staff member
Premium Member
Out of respect for the sacred office of the U.S. Presidency, please let's agree that President Trump's intelligence shouldn't be insulted by sophomoric name calling; whereas, President Trump is being amusingly informative when he attributes descriptive nick names summarizing the flawed characteristics of our political adversaries. Right?
Sacred? The president is elected by people and not appointed by deity.

In other words if the president calls people he dislikes names, it is ok. If someone does that to him, it is not ok. A good double standard by your standards?

Maybe @Kangaroo Feathers is being amusingly informative.
 

Salvador

RF's Swedenborgian
Your citations, of course, simply support the points of the OP.

Evidence, please.

President Trump proposed 4,4 trillion dollars of federal government spending for fiscal year 2019 References: Bloomberg - Are you a robot? Trump’s $4.4 Trillion Budget Helps Move Deficit Sharply Higher
Trump’s 4.4 trillion dollar budget would increase US deficit - Independent.ie

The budget office estimates the federal government will have spent $4.536 trillion in FY 2019;

Compare Congress’ Enacted Budget to Trump’s FY 2019 Request

Congress has approved over $100 billion more in federal spending last year than the $4.4 trillion of restrained federal spending that President Trump had proposed.

Hence, Congress are bigger spenders of taxpayer dollars than even Donald J. Trump.
 

shmogie

Well-Known Member
TDS warps reality to the point that up means down, and green means red.

One with this disease simply cannot, under any circumstances, admit that Trump has made any good decision.

The sufferer wants failure on Trumps part so desperately, they look at anything, everything, as his failure.

A booming economy, they want it to mirror Obama's, which was good then, to them, but would be bad now for Trump.

After Trump whacked the terrorist general, they were hoping for war with Iran, to blame the war on Trump. Not being able to do that, they agreed with the mad mullah's, and blamed him for the vaunted quds force shooting down a civilian jetliner. Though the democrats buy the Iranian propaganda, the Iranian people do not, and they are demonstrating en masse against their own government for shooting the plane down, not Trump.

So it goes on and on, low unemployment is explained as bad. Lowest unemployment in history for minorities, bad, literalist judges, bad, etc. etc.
 

Cooky

Veteran Member
Derpy Donny is fitting for your president who screwed up with these tariffs and has gave more bailout money to farmers than what the recession bailouts cost us. Dumb**** Donny is too stupid to realize countries like China won't just stand back and take such things.

TARIFFS ARE WHAT THIS COUNTRY WAS BUILT ON:

"Tariffs, to protect manufacturers and jobs, were the Republican Party’s path to power and prosperity in the 19th and 20th centuries, before the rise of the Rockefeller Eastern liberal establishment and its embrace of the British-bred heresy of unfettered free trade.

The Tariff Act of 1789 was enacted with the declared purpose, “the encouragement and protection of manufactures.” It was the second act passed by the first Congress led by Speaker James Madison. It was crafted by Alexander Hamilton and signed by President Washington."

Tariffs: The Taxes That Made America Great
 

Dan From Smithville

What we've got here is failure to communicate.
Staff member
Premium Member
It's derivative.
That's what they say about all great artists, but history will see me vindicated. Just because 100% of Revoltistanians on this thread consider it derivative reflects on that culture and not on the greatness of the appellation.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I am fond of the Great Fabricator. It has an historical continuity with past Republican presidents too. This is not offered for its humor, but for its accuracy.
I wonder...
Is there any worse insult than calling him Donald Trump?
To use playful names seems to diminish the feeling of opposition.
Dang near affectionate.
 

Dan From Smithville

What we've got here is failure to communicate.
Staff member
Premium Member
I wonder...
Is there any worse insult than calling him Donald Trump?
To use playful names seems to diminish the feeling of opposition.
Dang near affectionate.
I think it is the result of more accurate names reflecting a true sentiment and character assessment failing to survive software moderation on internet forums.
 

Dan From Smithville

What we've got here is failure to communicate.
Staff member
Premium Member
I wonder...
Is there any worse insult than calling him Donald Trump?
To use playful names seems to diminish the feeling of opposition.
Dang near affectionate.
Using his name as a pejorative to describe others would be more insulting. Let's ask Mr Owl or, better yet, Captain Dunsel.
 

Dan From Smithville

What we've got here is failure to communicate.
Staff member
Premium Member
Last edited:
Top