• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Snakehead fish

ecco

Veteran Member
Ignorance is bliss. This can be cured by learning.

Willful ignorance is willful ignorance. There is no cure.
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Is the snakehead fish, a fish that can live in water or breathe air and kind of move on land, a confirmation of evolution theory as part of the theory that humans started out as a fish-like creature?
It is not against the truthful Religion, life evolved in millions of years.

Regards
 

England my lionheart

Rockerjahili Rebel
Premium Member
I am not ignoring. I am saying, so what? Look at it as an opportunity for more food. Especially for the poor man. He can go to the river and catch all the snakehead he can.

Good-Ole-Rebel

Type in to professor Google "cane toad Australia",devastation unless you want to get high.
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
What if a frog had wings? What if.....

What a jump. From finding snakehead fish to now being a desert. Gee, I wonder why there are still rivers in China, and Japan, and Russia....with snakeheads in them. Plus they are still breathing air over there.

Yall go ahead and worry about the deserts and lack of air due to the snakehead. I think it is silly.

Good-Ole-Rebel
Again, learn some ecology, and learn to anticipate multi-step sequences.
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
What if a frog had wings? What if.....

What a jump. From finding snakehead fish to now being a desert. Gee, I wonder why there are still rivers in China, and Japan, and Russia....with snakeheads in them. Plus they are still breathing air over there.

Yall go ahead and worry about the deserts and lack of air due to the snakehead. I think it is silly.
No, you feel it's silly. As I said, learn some ecology, and learn to anticipate multi-step ramifications and long-term consequences.
Instead of bass tournaments we will have snakehead tournaments and catch and no release. I always thought catch and release was silly anyway.

How is that for drawing a connection between A and B.
Pretty poor, I'd say.
Snakeheads in the US don't fit into the existing ecosystem, that's why they're a problem, no checks and balances.

Over here snakeheads tend to eat themselves out of house and home. That's why they so often have to take off over land to find greener pastures, so to speak. They strip a lake of apex predators, ie: other fish, which leads to a cascade of consequences. The 'bottom' rungs in the system will proliferate out of control and you'll get a large vat of algal/bacterial sludge, which will, in a series of steps, consume the available nutrients, die, and rot, leaving a 'dead', deoxygenated, smelly mess.

That is, put a few snakeheads in a pond and you'll likely get no fish at all for your tournaments.

Then there are the effects on the insects, birds, amphibians, reptiles, and mammals that rely on that pond one way or another. They're part of the interdependent web, as well, as are the plants in the region.
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Type in to professor Google "cane toad Australia",devastation unless you want to get high.
Or "rabbits in Australia," or cats, or... They caused; are causing, no end of economic problems for humans, to say nothing of the ongoing ecological devastation.

I read about new invasives causing problems, somewhere, practically weekly: Pythons in Florida, frogs in Hawaii, cats, rats, medflies, brown tree snakes.... There seems no end to them.
 

England my lionheart

Rockerjahili Rebel
Premium Member
Or "rabbits in Australia," or cats, or... They caused; are causing, no end of economic problems for humans, to say nothing of the ongoing ecological devastation.

I read about new invasives causing problems, somewhere, practically weekly: Pythons in Florida, frogs in Hawaii, cats, rats, medflies, brown tree snakes.... There seems no end to them.

It's a global problem,birds in new zealand nest on the ground having no predators untill stoats from the UK or possoms from Australia got there,like you say it's a big problem.
 

Good-Ole-Rebel

Well-Known Member
Again, learn some ecology, and learn to anticipate multi-step sequences.

Are there still rivers in China, Russia, and Japan with snakehead fish in them? Why? Why are they still there? Why isn't the area where the rivers are nothing but desert?

Good-Ole-Rebel
 

Good-Ole-Rebel

Well-Known Member
No, you feel it's silly. As I said, learn some ecology, and learn to anticipate multi-step ramifications and long-term consequences.
Pretty poor, I'd say.
Snakeheads in the US don't fit into the existing ecosystem, that's why they're a problem, no checks and balances.

Over here snakeheads tend to eat themselves out of house and home. That's why they so often have to take off over land to find greener pastures, so to speak. They strip a lake of apex predators, ie: other fish, which leads to a cascade of consequences. The 'bottom' rungs in the system will proliferate out of control and you'll get a large vat of algal/bacterial sludge, which will, in a series of steps, consume the available nutrients, die, and rot, leaving a 'dead', deoxygenated, smelly mess.

That is, put a few snakeheads in a pond and you'll likely get no fish at all for your tournaments.

Then there are the effects on the insects, birds, amphibians, reptiles, and mammals that rely on that pond one way or another. They're part of the interdependent web, as well, as are the plants in the region.

Oh, I see. Snakeheads here are not like snakeheads there. But yet you gave all kinds of information about how the snakeheads eat everything, turn the rivers into desert, and no one can breathe any air anymore. What did you base that on if not the snakeheads over there. You're changing your tune and getting sillier.

As I said, you can always have a snakehead tournament. Snakehead is a fish. They probably taste better than bass anyway. Catch and Keep.

Oh please. Every fish in the water will go after insects and anything that it can choke down. The only thing that smells is your whining.

Good-Ole-Rebel
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Are there still rivers in China, Russia, and Japan with snakehead fish in them? Why? Why are they still there? Why isn't the area where the rivers are nothing but desert?
Oh, I see. Snakeheads here are not like snakeheads there. But yet you gave all kinds of information about how the snakeheads eat everything, turn the rivers into desert, and no one can breathe any air anymore. What did you base that on if not the snakeheads over there. You're changing your tune and getting sillier.
Rebel, you're drivin' me nuts. Please read my posts more carefully. Oh, and read some ecology.
Organisms are part of a system. Snakeheads are part of a system. There are checks and balances.
Raccoons aren't a problem here in the US, but they're becoming one in Germany and Japan. Rabbits aren't a problem in Europe, but they are in Australia.

Keystone species - Wikipedia
 
Last edited:

Good-Ole-Rebel

Well-Known Member
Rebel, you're drivin' me nuts. Please read my posts more carefully. Oh, and read some ecology.
Organisms are part of a system. Snakeheads are part of a system. There are checks and balances.
Raccoons aren't a problem here in the US, but they're becoming one in Germany and Japan. Rabbits aren't a problem in Europe, but they are in Australia.

Keystone species - Wikipedia

What checks and balances are you talking about. Survival of the fittest...right? If snakeheads can make it and bass can't, sorry but that is the way it is. Eat mo snakehead. And mo catfish.

If Rabbits are a problem then the problem is with Australia. Great eating. Why should there be a problem? Just give the people a recipe. Like they didn't have one already.

Good-Ole-Rebel
 

night912

Well-Known Member
What checks and balances are you talking about. Survival of the fittest...right? If snakeheads can make it and bass can't, sorry but that is the way it is. Eat mo snakehead. And mo catfish.

If Rabbits are a problem then the problem is with Australia. Great eating. Why should there be a problem? Just give the people a recipe. Like they didn't have one already.

Good-Ole-Rebel
They are immigrants that entered the U.S. illegally, making them illegal immigrants. Don't you listen to President Trump?

They're also taking the jobs of the natives......











By replacing the usual fish as food for Americans. And soon to be replacing bass in tournaments. :D
 

Good-Ole-Rebel

Well-Known Member
They are immigrants that entered the U.S. illegally, making them illegal immigrants. Don't you listen to President Trump?

They're also taking the jobs of the natives......

By replacing the usual fish as food for Americans. And soon to be replacing bass in tournaments. :D

They wouldn't be taking away jobs. Just changing the nature of the job.

How many Americans eat bass anyway? I don't think that is the usual fish for Americans. I lean more to Catfish. I don't see any bass parlours around.

Good-Ole-Rebel
 
Top