Skwim
Veteran Member
Boy, ain't that the truth.Ditto, and I had a fleeting thought that maybe whoever wrote up the original correlative had learned it via a "game of telephone" of sorts, and the original person making the observation may have stated 2π (number of radians that represent a full circle), but someone down the line liked the simplified "π" better - 'cause you know, who gives a crap about facts?
"Don't confuse me with the facts."
"Facts are only for the unimaginative."
"If it wasn't for facts I'd be a lot smarter."
.