Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Are you guys just acting dumb? A Cane toad is a toad. A Blue Moon Butterfly is a Butterfly. I don't know what those other things are. I thought maybe you were getting lucky and someone had discovered a Nestor Notabilis was born of a Cane Toad, but sorry, it's a bird born of another BIRD.
Bold empty claims do not support bold empty claims.Yes I do have a claim...as substantiated as the one science promotes.
We do not have dibs on "wishful thinking" as science has its own fair share of that. And as for "logical fallacies", the fallasy part is a matter of opinion, but at least ours are "logical" as opposed to the completely illogical claims made for evolution.
Are you related to a banana or a fruit fly Mestemia? Is T Rex a cousin to a chicken?
We have nothing cast in stone either, apart from the basic foundations of our belief in the Creator. We are always reevaluating and adjusting our views on things. Its what I like about being a JW. If we make a mistake, we correct it.
That is again, a matter of opinion. Sometimes the actual strawmen look like the real McCoy.
They need a brain and their companions need a heart! Some of us just want to go home because we are sick of living in a world where science has created so many problems that it cannot solve.
I don't think the dishonesty is intentional, but more to the fact that "suggestion" has power, and when it is widely accepted because of who suggests it, it gains momentum and you have a great body of supporters on board and a lot of ego stroking that makes men feel like gods. There is power, accolades and money motivating science and I believe that it has gone to their heads.But that is just my opinion.
Do you really not understand that a new kind of bird is no proof?
Is @Deeje getting under your skin?
again, I presented you with examples of evolution in action.
Nope.
But, why do you insist that we are denying micro evolution? Different kinds of birds are due to MICRO evolution! Macro evolution means the change into NEW things.
You seem to have me confused with someone else.
I get it. We are fighting about words. I don't want to do that.
I am done playing pigeon chess.
Oh c'mon Mestemia...you have no answers, just admit it. You're just hacking yourself to pieces here....
There are over 10 000 species of birds. So what you are saying is that your god created one male and one female generic bird and this bird microevolved into all the different species of birds we have today like the bee hummingbird and the ostrich?
Yes but did he personally create some flying male and female things that later evolved into birds, bats and flying insects or did he personally create a male and female generic bird, bat and flying insect that later evolved into different bird, bat and flying insect species or did he create each species separately?
Can't you just answer my post so I can know what it is I'm supposed to get?do you get it yet?
Geeze Artie, do I actually have to dumb it down any further?
God made living things by directly creating all of his creatures. He made a male and female of everything so that his mandate to "fill the earth" with their kind could be carried out. He never used micro-evolution in the creative process because he didn't need to. OK? Micro-evolution is adaptation...small changes, not major ones, that took place later.Why can't you just answer my specific question? Did God make a generic bird that later evolved into bee hummingbirds and ostriches or did he make for example a generic hummingbird that later evolved into all the different hummingbird species or did he make each separate hummingbird species?