• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Evidence for ID THREAD!!

Fatmop

Fatmop

Active Member
in order for a theory to be within the scope of scientific inquiry, it must be falsifiable.
Click to expand...
At least, according to Popper. That's not a perfect line of demarcation by any means. However, what you point out is perfectly true - and there's no reason to include ID under the banner of science when it relies on the supernatural.

Well I guess I have to comment
Click to expand...
AND CONGRATULATIONS!!! POST #500!!!!!!

As regards to the ever evolving scientific data available to me, that does not now nor shall it ever disprove my FAITH in the infinite and absolute.
Click to expand...
You sound like you've done some very serious thinking on the subject. That's reasonable, and I think you would agree that ID does not belong in the science classroom for the reasons Mr. Spinkles listed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top