Otherright
Otherright
I agree. My faith is what guides my path. There is wisdom found in many things. Sometimes, it isn't the teacher, but the lesson.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
God is the Foundation of Faith, Not Texts.
- Thread starter ChristineES
- Start date
sojourner
Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
I've gotten lost in the give-and-take snippets. What are you talking about here?i'm seeing double...there is no standard..all things to all men only indicates an unsettling doctrine, because it is constantly adjusting to a biased POV...
and for me, that simply doesn't work...
if that dress is unflattering on me, i want to know, darn it!!!
volition, responsibility and culpability are taken away from the individual as a believer? How do figure?
Orias
Left Hand Path
I don't know if I can necessarily agree with this, unless of course you could take "God" for what it is without all of that silly mumbo jumbo behind it.
Agree with the OP, though I'm not Christian nor do I follow the Bible.
waitasec
Veteran Member
truth is truth...
hebrews 9:22
In fact, the law requires that nearly everything be cleansed with blood, and without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness.
Caladan
Agnostic Pantheist
The early Christians began their first steps as a Jewish sect of the first century, they were of course joined by converts. this early sect collectively held the Hebrew Bible of Judaism as scripture.
This is a general scholarly premise, and there is no shame for scholars to say it is attested both by early Christian texts and by the New Testament.
you say that the NT did not officially exist for them to base their faith on, however that is simply uprooting the first three centuries of the Christian faith.
the New Testament, gives us an insight into the opinions, ideas, and beliefs of early Christians. the philosophy, the acts, the understanding, and the beliefs of early Christians culminated in the creation of the New Testament.The New Testament clearly demonstrates, that that the early Christians saw Jesus as growing out of the Hebrew Bible and out of Judaism. in the promise of Jeremiah as fulfilled and embodied in Jesus, and that the early Christians, the earliest of Christians more notably, as the New Testament scholar N. T. Wright tells us, were searching the Hebrew scripture in order to understand the physical life of Jesus.
Your premise. that the so called gentiles did not have a text. means that these gentile believers stood on the shoulders of men who did have an understanding of the Scripture, and supposedly made sure that their converts knew exactly what to say when Paul was coming to test the congregation.
this was a very eschagological time. the believers had to base their doctrine and faith on a well founded ground. on authentic scripture. where did they get their beliefs in this eschatological era? obviously it was from the Hebrew Scripture and the belief in the coming messiah, and from earlier Jewish sects. the early Christian sect was not isolated in its beliefs from earlier Judaic sects, and was not isolated from the greater body of scripture these sects adhered to.
these converts sure did not believe in the Venus of Willendorf. they believed that Jesus of Nazareth, who was preaching in Jerusalem and in Nazareth is the promised messiah. where did they get faith in this man from? which scripture did they base their faith that this man is indeed the promised messiah?
this was an organised community, they had texts and scripture to refer to, texts written by them, and the Hebrew Scripture.
it is not a mystery that the church fathers included the OT and the NT in the official canon. the idea did not simply dawn three or four centuries later on the church fathers.
there is a line of doctrine that the main councils had to work with. this or these doctrines were developed by the congregations of the earliest Christians, they also had a platform to work on, the Scripture. the Scripture all other sects worked with.
Last edited:
ellenjanuary
Well-Known Member
Some people have said they believe that the Bible is the foundation of Christian beliefs. After thinking this over for a few days, I have decided to respond this way: The Bible is a guide book for my path, but it is not the foundation of my faith. The foundation of my faith is God.
Do any other faiths feel the same way about God and their various religious texts?
Why, yes. But I have found, someone try to thump a Bible this way and get thumped; they are trying to tell me something the picked up from the church and/or the minister, rather than trusting in Spirit to illuminate Word.
waitasec
Veteran Member
explain to me what different audiences means?
it's not like one is listening to pat methany and hears speed metal...
that is what you are essentially saying, there were different audiences but 1 person who was depicted with the absence of consistency...instead he was portrayed with a contrast...truth is truth.
it is their saving grace...
sojourner
Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
That sounds real nice and all, but you're forgetting that the texts were only a very small part of the transmitted faith. Since these people were overwhelmingly illiterate, they relied more on tradition than on the scriptures themselves. the early Xian community was built more on testimony and the example of agape than on text.
sojourner
Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
Different audiences display different points of view and demand that the faith be mulivalent -- which it is. In this case, "truth" embodies a very wide avenue, with multiple lanes.
But it's how that person is depicted. To quote Alfred Burt, "Some children see him lily white, the baby Jesus born this night ... some children see him bronzed and brown, the Lord of heaven to earth come down..."
Jesus is Jesus, but jesus was presented in different ways, with emphasis on different aspects of how he embodied the new faith.
No it isn't. That's one way of looking at it, but many, many Xians don't subscribe to that doctrine.
Cain
Member
any other 'Faiths'? I guess that includes me?Some people have said they believe that the Bible is the foundation of Christian beliefs. After thinking this over for a few days, I have decided to respond this way: The Bible is a guide book for my path, but it is not the foundation of my faith. The foundation of my faith is God.
Do any other faiths feel the same way about God and their various religious texts?
The Christian religion is not about these silly rules and regulations, not about Sin, it is not about guilt and persecution, not about salvation . . . all those things are what Man have attached to this Belief System.
This Judeo-Christian bible (there are others you know?) is simply a love letter. It's about Love.
Yeshua the Nazarene is One of a several Lucifers manifest in this material World.
Caladan
Agnostic Pantheist
Well my post might sound nice. but your post sounds a bit romantic. a sect which has won converts all the way from Antioch in Syria to Galatia in North Central Anatolia by the display of love and exemplary behavior?
these men and women, these new converts must have had some concept as to the new faith they are converting to, they must have had some concept of what the Judaic communities that lived in Syria and Anatolia adhere to, a basic idea of their beliefs.
just as they had some concept of the Hellenic beliefs that were part of their environment.
once converted into the faith, they must have been studying the Hebrew Scripture with their congregations. and as the official Christian canons show us, they had to adhere to the Hebrew Bible as the base of their faith.
Last edited:
sojourner
Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
Yep. Studies show that converts are made, by-and-large from folks with whom we are well-acquainted. Xy is personalized religion, because it really is about relationship.
Yes, they did. It was modeled for them by the folks they knew. And it's well-documented that most Gentiles took the Xian faith and molded it to their own cultural expression (hence, the argument that Gentile converts didn't have to be circumcised).
that's the point: Once they were converted. Their coming to conversion was informed by means other than reading texts. And, once again, even after conversion, they most likely were informed by oral recitation of story and not by reading text, since most of them would have been illiterate.
Hmmm... I thought the NT points out that Jesus is the ground of our faith...
Caladan
Agnostic Pantheist
Hi sojourner. Its possible that I wont be answering the debate in the next three days. since I'll be vacating.
attested to the importance of the OT, even more than that, its central role as scripture, scripture, as it was not yet redefined as the OT in the lack of the existence of the NT canon, are the events concerning Marcion in 144 AD.
Marcion, by Gnostic influence excluded the Hebrew Scripture of Judaism from the early Christian texts. the result of course was that he was deemed a heretic.
this is mid second century. par excellence what you would call early Christianity. Marcion is declared a heretic for exlcuding the OT from the teachings of early Christianity.
"All things must be fulfilled which are written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms concerning me."
Luke 24:44
This argument can only go that far. as Paul, and the Apostels movement debated the heathens, and were preaching the good news. these men had a clear system of beliefs, and they preached it among Hellenic societies and crowds.
The discussion about which of the disciples, of course later to become the apostles were illiterate also exists. it doesn't take from the fact that these men also grew up on the moral fiber of the OT by oral tradition, nor does it take from the fact that this gave them a platform to preach from.
attested to the importance of the OT, even more than that, its central role as scripture, scripture, as it was not yet redefined as the OT in the lack of the existence of the NT canon, are the events concerning Marcion in 144 AD.
Marcion, by Gnostic influence excluded the Hebrew Scripture of Judaism from the early Christian texts. the result of course was that he was deemed a heretic.
this is mid second century. par excellence what you would call early Christianity. Marcion is declared a heretic for exlcuding the OT from the teachings of early Christianity.
What Jesus is documented saying in the NT is food for thought:
"All things must be fulfilled which are written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms concerning me."
Luke 24:44
Last edited:
Many Sages One Truth
Active Member
Some people have said they believe that the Bible is the foundation of Christian beliefs. After thinking this over for a few days, I have decided to respond this way: The Bible is a guide book for my path, but it is not the foundation of my faith. The foundation of my faith is God.
Do any other faiths feel the same way about God and their various religious texts?
Greetings, Sister Christine
Yes I agree with you. Books can only be the word of God in a very limited sense, in that they are the products of their time and culture. The best and most true word of God is our experiences with God.
Namaste
waitasec
Veteran Member
so when it comes to disease, earthquakes, tsunamis, these subjected to what exactly...empirical scientific truths or statements of faith...
spiritual truths based on absence of rationality and logic doesn't work.
it's adhering to double standards.
yes but the core identity of real person doesn't change...if they are indeed real, however if we are talking about a chameleon type of character then where is the standard for spiritual truth? hence the reason there are so many different interpretations.
still doesn't deter from the fact that a lot do...
Some people have said they believe that the Bible is the foundation of Christian beliefs. After thinking this over for a few days, I have decided to respond this way: The Bible is a guide book for my path, but it is not the foundation of my faith. The foundation of my faith is God.
Do any other faiths feel the same way about God and their various religious texts?
Where would your particular faith emerge if not through the texts that codify it?
Jordan St. Francis
Well-Known Member
Scripture is an invaluable part of receiving the faith----but nonetheless the faith is received. It is not merely read. The fact of Scripture's necessity reminds us of God's will that human mediation be a necessity in the transmission of faith. Before there was Scripture, there were the events, experience and reflections that would one day become Scripture.
And still, so, in some reflection, today. Whoever first learned of God directly from a text? No. You learn from your mother, your father, your teachers, your grandmother, your priest, your rituals, your prayers. And not at all just in words, but in deeds and responses to life as it unfolds. This is why I would say that no text has absolute primacy. It has always been contextualized in experience.
And still, so, in some reflection, today. Whoever first learned of God directly from a text? No. You learn from your mother, your father, your teachers, your grandmother, your priest, your rituals, your prayers. And not at all just in words, but in deeds and responses to life as it unfolds. This is why I would say that no text has absolute primacy. It has always been contextualized in experience.