• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Recent content by Rhma

  1. R

    Can Christianity be defended logically?

    I called you no name. I referenced your own title for yourself, and said "I should have known" because of that title which is your own choice as to how you identify yourself. Now who's lying. I said "Bye Bye." I said nothing about leaving.
  2. R

    Can Christianity be defended logically?

    Yah, well, at least you're not random.
  3. R

    Can Christianity be defended logically?

    Thought you said this is not a religious discussion board. Even the title page says it is. Care to explain? As for "personal attack" against you, that is not true. All I did was quote your own title for yourself, and pointed out that it should have been my first clue. How is that possibly...
  4. R

    Can Christianity be defended logically?

    Well, Excuse me. I stumbled accross the board when I researched "Bible discussion boards." *edit* I should have known. Bye Bye!
  5. R

    Can Christianity be defended logically?

    "Context" is used "out of context" by theologians, to mean whatever the theologian wants it to mean. In the Context of intimacy, "love" has many meanings; i.e,. from the Greek agape, which references devotional love, as in [Mat 5:46]; The Greek adelphos, which references affection, similar to...
  6. R

    Can Christianity be defended logically?

    And why must mythology be born in mind about a book? I compare the claims made by the author agaisnt claims made by detractors thousands of years after the fact, who think the labe "Scholar" actually makes them smart, and who feel the need to prove their won abilities to be superior to that...
  7. R

    Can Christianity be defended logically?

    Not a flaw because not applicable. For anything in my post to apply to any particular religion listed in same post, requires that the application be limited to the religions that fit the parameters in question. It is obvious to anyone reading my post, that the remarks that cover centuries...
  8. R

    Can Christianity be defended logically?

    Now, why would your "preference" have a chance to show up in my responses? If I did respond with "your preference" in mind, you will only deny it. You will find some way to denigrate it, overshadow it with your own brilliance, attack my own youth and inexperience. No, the only way my response...
  9. R

    The Trinity

    Truth? You don't even have an apple. Remember? You ate it. And eating it in a bag is not easy. I usually take it out of the bag and eat it.
  10. R

    What is the mystery of the kingdom?

    Click Here If the king cannot levy taxes without permission from the parlaiment, it is parliament that rules. The power to levy taxes is the ultimate power.
  11. R

    Can Christianity be defended logically?

    Would you rather have us post the whole bible, underlining what would otherwise be a "quote", or use particular quotes? Why must there be a derogatory label applied to everything, as though quoting a part of scripture is somehow wrong? Or, perhaps it reflects more on you as the labele maker???
  12. R

    Can Christianity be defended logically?

    Stop with the "bad boy" rhetoric. First, there is no "pretense" in a simple response to an OP. Second, I responded to you, didn't I? And you disagree with me, don't you? And I considered you "worthy of response? So, your remark is only designed to denigrate or insult, because it goes against...
  13. R

    Can Christianity be defended logically?

    Allow me to begin with apology for missed opportunity to behave. I have been reminded, thankfully, that there are standards to which adherance is required. I will strain to remain on the plane of correctitude. Missed this earlier. If I understand correctly, your statement, it seems you...
  14. R

    Can Christianity be defended logically?

    Opposing offenses impaling themselves upon opposing defenses in an effort to present a coherent fully adequate explanation for what appears to be a salad of words with no coherent design other that to titilate the mind, all the while overwhelming an unknown opponent who is attempting to remain...
  15. R

    Can Christianity be defended logically?

    But what if that is the intent of the author? Remember the scope and the focus of the narrative. it is to tell a cohesive story about a singular character, designated from one man's family, with pertinent detail sufficient for identification from among millions, all the while keeping secret...
See more
Top