My bad I thought there was only the first page on this topic not 29 O_o.Any way my first comment
*btw proof should've been prove*
I meant that without a belief in gods science is the next logical choice to back up your own point of view.
Bad Grammar? I forgot a comma but that's all. And yes...
I've heard of it before but fundamentally General relativity is so simple that it is almost impossible to debunk. anyway many people do not take c to be the speed of light per se. It is a constant used in GR and just so happens to be the same as the speed of light as it is measured.
Well you don't really need maths for it. Think about it carefully. The big bang occurred and the odds of the whole thing going right and forming a universe as we know it that didn't just instantly collapse etc. is unbelievably small anyway let alone the chance that it happened ont the first time...
How does real science prove god? I believe that currently science cannot disprove god, but given time it will, but it will be ignored. Mathematical science has a way of proving damn near everything.
scienc should not be considered a religion because quite plainly it isn't! And yes it is very important to teach science in schools, imo religion is not required in anyway.
If you're religious it doesn't bother me, but I remember many wasted classes spent in religion where I could have been...
This is not a chance? Well I'm afraid you are quite wrong, first off there are a few planets that have been observed in the habitable zone surrounding distance stars with masses comprobable to Earth.
As for the big bang. It is quite likely that it occured many many times before the "current"...
Well an atheist does not believe in gods so what else is there to proof the non-existence of gods? Science can and does prove everything useful it seems only logical that it could also be used to deny an existence of gods.
And anyway an atheist does not need science to prove his point. I...