Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No, you aren't understanding me. I'm saying a FAKE test has been designed which will NOT cause rotting thighs or swollen belly. The purpose of the fake test is to placate the husband who is irrationally jealous of an innocent woman. Othello Syndrome is a very real thing.
So what is the fate of the pregnancy when a pregnant adulteress is commanded to be executed (Lev 20:10) after being found guilty by drinking a "bitter water" medication as commanded (Numbers 5:22)? Or do you choose to close your eyes to what the bible actually says and means?
Nonsense!!! Have you ever discussed your personal interpretation of that commandment with one of the biblical gods?
Think your argument through. The "Law of Jealousy" was to find out if a wife was being faithful or unfaithful. If the wife was being faithful then they did not receive any curses from God's judgements. If the wife was already pregnant then the husband would already see it. So what your proposing makes no sense. See post # 294 linked. Your post here is unresponsive to the post you are quoting from.
Think your argument through. What you're proposing makes no sense. When a pregnant adulteress is executed as commanded (Lev 20:10) then her pregnancy is aborted. And how on Earth would the husband know that his property was pregnant a week or so after her adultery anyway. The commandment in Numbers 5:20-28 to terminate pregnancies of adulteresses is about the property rights of men to ensure legitimate lines of descent and inheritance and has nothing whatsoever to do with a god. The reference to a god is no different to a judge when sentencing someone to death and sarcastically saying "And may the lord have mercy on your soul".
Well aren't you the funny one deflecting what I have already posted to you without addressing anything in the post you are responding to? Please forgive me dear friend but I do believe what the bible actually says which is why I posted scripture context as a help to you that you have disregarded that proves your interpretation of Leviticus 20 and Numbers 5 does not support what you are saying. Your response has only been silence, repetition and deflection and an unwillingness to address my earlier posts and scriptures shared with you that prove your claims that God promotes abortion is unbiblical nonsense and lies. There is nothing in Numbers 5 or Leviticus 20 about abortion. It is Gods judgement for a faithful and unfaithful woman from the law of jealousy. You are reading abortion into the scriptures and disregarding scripture context. The answer to your question is in the context you disregard. It is the law of jealousy to see if a woman is being faithful or not faithful. The curse is a judgement from God only received from God for unfaithfulness. If you disagree please address the scriptures and the context you disregarded showing your teachings are in error from post # 235 linked. If you cannot please forgive me but I do not believe you because you choose to close your eyes to what the bible actually says. As to your question? I do not go to Sunday school and yes I discuss Gods Word with God which is why I posted the scripture context that is in disagreement with you that I believe shows you do not know God or His Word so we will have to agree to disagree.
IOW when a pregnant adulteress is executed as commanded (Lev 20:10) then her pregnancy is aborted.
So how often have you seen your god and had a face to face discussion? And did you also share a meal like Abraham did with his god when they had a face to face discussion about the number of righteous children in Gomorrah, and how the god then walked down to count them, since he was neither an omniscient or omnipresent god (Gen 18)?
Your response here.
See post # 294 and post # 235 linked. Your post here is unresponsive to the posts you are quoting from that prove why your interpretation of the scriptures is unbiblical and does not support what you are saying. I meet my God every day through His Word, through my prayers and also sometimes in my dreams. He tells me through His Word that what you are posting is not biblical. Please forgive me but I do not believe you. I prefer what the scriptures teach in the linked posts you choose to ignore that show you why your teachings are not biblical.
So where do you meet your god each day, and do you share a meal together like Abraham and his god did (Gen 18)?
See post # 294 and post # 235 linked. Your post here is unresponsive to the posts you are quoting from that prove why your interpretation of the scriptures is unbiblical and does not support what you are saying. I meet my God every day through His Word, through my prayers and also sometimes in my dreams. He tells me through His Word that what you are posting is not biblical. Please forgive me but I do not believe you. I prefer what the scriptures teach in the linked posts you choose to ignore that show you why your teachings are not biblical.
And what is the colour of your god's eyes and skin?
Unresponsive to the post you are quoting from. See post # 310 linked.
That's your choice if you want to be unresponsive to what the bible actually says and means, but it doesn't change the fact that the pregnancies of adulteresses are aborted when pregnant adulteresses are commanded to be executed (Lev 20:10), even if you believe that the bible is unbiblical.
Unresponsive to the post you are quoting from. See post # 310 linked and post # 294 and post # 235 linked that prove from the scripture contexts you choose to disregard why your interpretation of the scriptures is unbiblical and does not support what you are saying.
And the broken record syndrome yet again.
Unresponsive to the posts you are quoting from and the scriptures that are in disagreement with you. See post # 310 linked and post # 294 and post # 235 linked that prove from the scripture contexts you choose to disregard, why your interpretation of the scriptures is unbiblical and does not support what you are saying. Lets talk more when you want to enter into discussion. Until then please forgive me but I do not believe you. I prefer to believe the scriptures provided in the linked posts that are in disagreement with you that you are unwilling to discuss with me.
And the broken record syndrome yet again in your continual "copy and posts". And alas you have still not proved anything at all, and cannot refute the fact that pregnancies are aborted when pregnant adulteresses are commanded to be executed (Leviticus 20:10).
Your deflecting what you are doing. I am sorry but I cannot help you if you refuse to believe the scriptures. Your posts are unresponsive to the posts you are quoting from and the scriptures that are in disagreement with you. See post # 310 linked and post # 294 and post # 235 linked that prove from the scripture contexts you choose to disregard, why your interpretation of the scriptures is unbiblical and does not support what you are saying.
Broken record syndrome yet again!!!
So what is your evidence that Numbers 5:22 describes a fake test which only causes the pregnancy termination of pregnant adulteresses and not rotting thighs, in order that they should then be executed (Lev 20:10)?