Oh, we do. You just don’t understand or acknowledge facts and knowledge.When you can refute anything I claim post it
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Oh, we do. You just don’t understand or acknowledge facts and knowledge.When you can refute anything I claim post it
Sinaiticus may not have been written till after that.
I have called for S&V to be C-14 tested, that and all things that are claimed to be older than 6000 years .
Of course no one is going to do that.
Sorry Mark 16:9-20 has been the ending of Mark in almost all manuscripts ever.
The few that do not have the last 12 are Satanic of course.
Can you refute any of my claims, proofs?
Can you meet the challenge?
Can you answer any of the few questions I have asked or give a rational answer to the origin of anything?
Except there is. It’s apparent that you aren’t educated on the facts and science.there is nothing on the face of the earth that can be proven to be billions of years old.
This is a claim, where is your evidence and argument?nothing lasts for billions of years.
It’s UV light that destroys paint. Cave art gets protected and preserved because they are in CAVES.they say cave paintings are 10s of thousands of years old but high-quality paint used on cars won't even last 50 yrs.
I do know some. One curious fellow that is all three of those told me the story of him spending quite a large sum of money on a telescope for the sole purpose of proving once and for all that the earth was indeed flat.I know of no King James Bible user is a flat earther
Although the pagan forbears believed it,
But I have proved it,
The earliest were the originals, then the first copies and translations.You have not proven the the Earliest Bibles .. including from shortly after the time of Contantine .. were written by Satanists as you claim .. nor have you shown that the KJV was not written by Satanists .. to claim "Proof" as such would be a deception.
But .. if the Earliest Bibles were indeed written by Satanists as you claim .. then you have confirmed that the KJV contains the hand of the Satanists - having been copied from copies of these earliest Bibles.
Oh what a tangled web we weave. Do you believe that Satan - the great deceiver - messed with the geology of the earth to make it look like the Global Flood never happened ? .. and does all kinds of other things to trick humans .. including messing with the Bible .. which explains all the contradictions, errors, omission, interpolation and Pious Fraud ?
This hypothesis of yours is getting interesting .. always gets exciting when Satan enters into the picture.
The earliest were the originals, then the first copies and translations.
Vetus Latina is mid 2nd century.
All of the NT was written by 70 AD .Sorry friend .. there was no new testimant Bible in the 2nd century .. there was a Jewish Bible but, no Bible containing the Gospel of Mark .. and this Gospel was written by Satanists according to you .. the later copies and translations finding their way into the Satanic KJV according to you.
Vetus Latina is not mid 2nd century friend .. you missed the mark by 200 years .. but no worries .. composed by satanists.
You failed to answer the question .. Do you believe that Satan - the great deceiver - messed with the geology of the earth to make it look like the Global Flood never happened ? .. and does all kinds of other things to trick humans .. including messing with the Bible .. which explains all the contradictions, errors, omission, interpolation and Pious Fraud ?
Your claim about abiogenisis calculation was was proven false .. by your lack of ability to tell us the implicit assumptions .. the assumptions you claim are forbidden to argument .. in a circular dance of logical fallacy denial deflection and now deception .. reciting the same material you know has been proven false .. but this a big rabbit hole to begin with .. as we are talking about your claim that Mark was written by satanists.All of the NT was written by 70 AD .
And you assertions are not true.
All of the NT by 70 AD in Greek.
And Vetus Latina by mid second century.
The geology proves 6 day creation about 6000 years ago with a world wide flood about 4500 years ago.
Satan has deceived the world and that includes you.
You have been had .
What was the first living creature and what features did it have?
What does your infallible science say?
Abiogenesis by natural processes is impossible.
So the no God assumption is disproved forever.
The basis of Atheistic Origin Science is a lie.
The same goes for the existence of the finely tuned universe.
Where did the universe come from?
Newsflash.... the KJV, is the copy.And of course that makes no sense.
If someone makes a copy of the Mona Lisa it proves the Mona Lisa is false.
And if someone pretends to be you, you never existed.
Wow what a crazy theory.
But that is how desperate the evolutionists are.
There's nothing there to refute.When you can refute anything I claim post it
Not sure if this was a serious post or just satire.there is nothing on the face of the earth that can be proven to be billions of years old. nothing lasts for billions of years. they say cave paintings are 10s of thousands of years old but high-quality paint used on cars won't even last 50 yrs.
Possibly unintended satire.Not sure if this was a serious post or just satire.
Well I did prove all my claims .There's nothing there to refute.
What is asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.
Well I did prove all my claims .
However, evolution is dismissed as it is asserted without evidence..
Untrue. You have proved nothing except that you don't understand what 'proof' means and you are astoundingly ignorant of science, logic, and mathematics.Well I did prove all my claims .
Also untrue. You have been given evidence and you just run away from it and pretend it's not there. You seem to be terrified of even considering the evidence (even more than most science deniers).However, evolution is dismissed as it is asserted without evidence..
What was the first living thing and what features did it have?Untrue. You have proved nothing except that you don't understand what 'proof' means and you are astoundingly ignorant of science, logic, and mathematics.
Also untrue. You have been given evidence and you just run away from it and pretend it's not there. You seem to be terrified of even considering the evidence (even more than most science deniers).
More running away....What was the first living thing and what features did it have?
Now answer both for the next 100 living things.
Where did all the matter and energy in the universe come from?
Where did the finely tuned and orderly laws of nature come from?
What caused the Big Bang?
What existed before that and what caused that?
what is there on the face of the earth that is billions of years old? if you make a claim about the age of the earth back it up.Not sure if this was a serious post or just satire.