McBell
mantra-chanting henotheistic snake handler
To much credit given, in my opinion
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Another irrefutable proof that God created all things using mathematical induction. And a proof that The Bible is the word of God.
- Thread starter SavedByTheLord
- Start date
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
Because sharing an identical ERV means you share a common ancestor in which said ERV formed.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Well people are descended from other people. That is not evolution.
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
We share identical ERV's with other species, in a nested hierarchical pattern.
Denial and willful ignorance, is not a proper argument.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
But why do you believe that God did not create things to be that way?
Or maybe it happened at the fall or after the flood.
ratiocinator
Lightly seared on the reality grill.
Calling your god a liar again...
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
For the same reason that I don't believe that the people in the TV can see me.
I understand how it works.
Or maybe you should get your head out of the sand.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Not me.
ratiocinator
Lightly seared on the reality grill.
Absolutely you. You just accused your god of planting false evidence to support evolution.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
God did not plant false evidence.
Satan just gives you false theories.
Remember Satan deceives the whole world.
ratiocinator
Lightly seared on the reality grill.
You just said it did:
'That way' being so it looks exactly like evolution happened.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
It does not,
No create kind is turning into another just adaption within created kind.
The false science of projecting outside of measured or observed ranges has fooled you.
ratiocinator
Lightly seared on the reality grill.
So you didn't understand the subject that was being talked about....
Irrelevant (even if it wasn't nonsense).
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
It disproves a key requirement of your falsified theories.
ratiocinator
Lightly seared on the reality grill.
What does?
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
There are no super giant dogs because any changes beyond a certain point break the spring.
This is observed in all species.
And this is not just limited to other traits,
They have been breading horses for vey many years and yet, there is a limit on their speed and endurance.
I just refuted macro evolution forever.
RIP macroevolution as well as abiogenesis and the Big Bang.
ratiocinator
Lightly seared on the reality grill.
Are you incapable of remembering the subject at hand, or is this another attempt to deliberately change the subject because you know you've been backed into a corner?
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
You might want to read your own post and post #1 of this thread,
Projection outside of measured or observed ranges is pseudo science.
And they only observation is that created kind produces created .
So it is pseudo science to project that adaptation within created kind (microevolution) proves one kind evolving into another (macroevolution).
And the analogy of a spring is quite good.
There are no super giant dogs because any changes beyond a certain point break the spring.
This is observed in all species.
And this is not just limited to other traits,
They have been breading horses for vey many years and yet, there is a limit on their speed and endurance.
I just refuted macro evolution forever.
RIP macroevolution as well as abiogenesis and the Big Bang.
ratiocinator
Lightly seared on the reality grill.
Oh, I did. Post #1 was comedy gold! You proved way beyond reasonable doubt that you know nothing about mathematical induction.
I explained to you why the analogy with trying to bread giant dogs breaks down >here<. Endlessly repeating it without addressing the answer makes you look dim. Do you really want to give that impression?
Yet again you prove beyond reasonable doubt that you don't understand how to refute a scientific theory. Here is a tiny hint: you can't do it with an analogy, even if it's a very good one, let alone a ****-poor one, like yours.
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
He did if your stance is that god created identical ERV's in multiple species without them sharing ancestors in which the initial infection took place.
It would be like Mercedes designing and creating a car which never was in an accident that looks like this:
Or designing and creating a human with a scar resulting from a shark attack without it ever having been attacked by shark.
It's the planting of false evidence.
In ERV is pretty much an inheritable genetic scar resulting from an infection in an ancestor.
So if you share such identical scars with others, it means you share an ancestor in which that infection happened.
So to repeat: if you are going to claim that your god planted those scars in multiple species, then your god is planting false evidence of ancient infections that never happened.
I know you think you can deny this by remaining willfully ignorant about what ERV's actually are, but the only thing you accomplish by doing that is showing the entire forum how you have to engage in intellectual dishonesty to defend your bs.
Last edited: