• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Challenge for those that believe in billions of years for the age of things. Give anything that is more than 6000 years old. NO ASSUMPTIONS ALLOWED.

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Um...
The title sounds like it agrees with their bold empty claim?
BB died. Do not worry Christ will dissolve this one and create a new heaven and a new Earth where dwelleth righteousness. See how I used the KJB dwelleth

 

McBell

mantra-chanting henotheistic snake handler
BB died. Do not worry Christ will dissolve this one and create a new heaven and a new Earth where dwelleth righteousness. See how I used the KJB dwelleth

Which version of the Bible do you use?
Have you figured it out yet?
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Um...
The title sounds like it agrees with their bold empty claim?
You are right. I should have clicked on the link. From the first response:

"The Webb telescope is not determining any such thing. Protip: Read the entire article, not the headline."

Just like in the Time article he is only reading headlines. And in the case of the Time article he is reading them very poorly.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I don't need one. You could not find a valid source to save your life. The source could not even get who Eric J. Lerner is right:

Eric Lerner - Wikipedia

He is a science writer, and a bit of a loon. He has been spouting this nonsense for decades and no one respects him as a "scientist". Well that is except for the pseudoscience sources that are out there. Twice you have used articles that refer to him. He only has a BA in physics. He was in a grad school but dropped out because he could not do that math.

If you want to be taken seriously, make sure that your claims are supported by serious scientists. Not whackadoodles.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
I don't need one. You could not find a valid source to save your life. The source could not even get who Eric J. Lerner is right:

Eric Lerner - Wikipedia

He is a science writer, and a bit of a loon. He has been spouting this nonsense for decades and no one respects him as a "scientist". Well that is except for the pseudoscience sources that are out there. Twice you have used articles that refer to him. He only has a BA in physics. He was in a grad school but dropped out because he could not do that math.

If you want to be taken seriously, make sure that your claims are supported by serious scientists. Not whackadoodles.
Very many of your own experts have renounced the stupid Big Bang. It is very rare when one’s side own expert witnesses disprove their own side, What a crushing defeat. The evidence is in conflict with the theory and predictions from the Big Bang are failing.


 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Very many of your own experts have renounced the stupid Big Bang. It is very rare when one’s side own expert witnesses disprove their own side, What a crushing defeat. The evidence is in conflict with the theory and predictions from the Big Bang are failing.


Where? Quote the scientists and make sure it is from a reliable source.

By the way, early galaxies do not necessarily refute the Big Bang. That is more of a cosmology problem than a Big Bang problem.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Sure they are experts. You are not an expert.

Why do you link James Webb? He knew that the universe was billions of years old too. Do you need me to prove that?

EDIT: Oh, my bad, you linked another garbage site.
 

McBell

mantra-chanting henotheistic snake handler
Sure they are experts. You are not an expert.

I am certainly more of an expert than Dr. Kent Hovind, Ken the Hamster Ham, Ray Queef, oops, I mean Comfort...
But then, you lost track of the discussion...again
 

YoursTrue

Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
I consider the rib from adam to make an Eve a metaphor for the natural process of 'cell division' . The initial life must give a portion of itself to live into the next generations.
I can't speak for the validity of cell division in the case of Eve having been brought forth from Adam's rib. The only problem with deciding it was a made-up story is that is that it appears from what I read that the rib can regrow. And how did Moses know this way back then, that a rib can regenerate itself? Unless the circumstance was related to him by those who knew. Notice, please the following: We can regenerate! Researchers reveal our ribs regrow if damaged
 

YoursTrue

Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
So how did it reproduce itself, if it wasn't by cloning itself in the same way that other cells reproduce?
You want ME, a non-scientist educated in specifics in biology and physics to answer that? :) If you think you have the answer as to how it cloned, please offer, I'll be happy to see the answer, thanks.
 

Monty

Active Member
I can't speak for the validity of cell division in the case of Eve having been brought forth from Adam's rib. The only problem with deciding it was a made-up story is that is that it appears from what I read that the rib can regrow. And how did Moses know this way back then, that a rib can regenerate itself? Unless the circumstance was related to him by those who knew. Notice, please the following: We can regenerate! Researchers reveal our ribs regrow if damaged
IOW Eve had a Y chromosome.
 
Top