Evolution is the only theologically plausible answer

[Wildswanderer]

That only means that it had a beginning. It does not mean that a God had to create it.

Something from nothing again. Something or someone had to create the first energy or matter.

 

[Wildswanderer]

That is odd. There is more evidence for that than there is for gravity. Next thing you know you are going to claim that the Earth will fly out of its orbit and rocks will be safe because people can no longer drop them on your head.

For what? For organisms adapting? All creationists agree that they adapt.

 

[Wildswanderer]

No claim of "something from nothing" there.

Where did the components come from? And how can life come from non life? We can't even do that in a laboratory.

 

[Wildswanderer]

You still do not know how analogies work after all of this time. That is rather sad. But thanks for admitting that you were wrong.

You don't understand the irony of using a picture of something that was obviously a creation.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Something from nothing again. Something or someone had to create the first energy or matter.

No, not at all. Something from we do not know what. And please note, even if it was "nothing", something you would have to define, that still does not indicate a god.

Please note that only you claimed something from nothing here.

 

[Subduction Zone]

For what? For organisms adapting? All creationists agree that they adapt.

And by your poor definition adaption is evolution. You claim a magical limit to it, but cannot support that magical belief of yours at all.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Where did the components come from? And how can life come from non life? We can't even do that in a laboratory.

Chemicals produced by nature. And what a shock!!. We cannot reproduce an event that likely took millions of years.

But do you know what we can reproduce in the laboratory? Many of the possible steps. That is what can be reproduced

Meanwhile you have no reliable evidence at all for your beliefs.

 

[Subduction Zone]

You don't understand the irony of using a picture of something that was obviously a creation.

No irony. Why can't you understand an analogy? You should have learned that concept in middle school at the latest..

 

[Wildswanderer]

Chemicals produced by nature. And what a shock!!. We cannot reproduce an event that likely took millions of years.

Lol, magic time!
Time doesn't solve the issue. Even with intelligence we can not replicate the most simple form of creation?
Must have been a higher intelligence involved.

 

[Wildswanderer]

No irony. Why can't you understand an analogy? You should have learned that concept in middle school at the latest..

I know what an analogy is.
You used a poor one.

 

[Wildswanderer]

Chemicals produced by nature.

Nature is magic now? Nature has laws and works certain ways because it was designed.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Lol, magic time!
Time doesn't solve the issue. Even with intelligence we can not replicate the most simple form of creation?
Must have been a higher intelligence involved.

No,now that is irony considering you believe in magic. And your claim is false. It was refuted almost seventy years ago by the Miller Urey experiment

 

[Subduction Zone]

I know what an analogy is.
You used a poor one.

No, if you did understand analogies you would know that I used a perfect one. The fact that a creator existed for the puzzle was irrelevant for the analogy.

Just be honest and admit that you didn't understand it.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Nature is magic now? Nature has laws and works certain ways because it was designed.

Dude! You believe in magic. There was no magic in abiogenesis.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Nonsense.


biology, abiogenesis (from a- 'not' + Greek bios 'life' + genesis 'origin') or the origin of life is the natural process by which life has arisen from non-living matter, such as simple organic compounds. The prevailing scientific hypothesis is that the transition from non-living to living entities on Earth was not a single event, but an evolutionary process (i.e., a process of gradually increasing complexity) that involved the formation of a habitable planet, the prebiotic synthesis of organic molecules, molecular self-replication, self-assembly, autocatalysis, and the emergence of cell membranes.

Organic compounds aren't nothing. What are you talking about?

What did God supposedly create the universe from?

 

[SkepticThinker]

Do you need a link? I can provide one.

Yes please, if you've got the time, I would much appreciate that.

 

[SkepticThinker]

One day, Tiktaalik would give birth to cats and dogs, via a few intermediate steps. Amazing what evolution can do when you first believe.

If that were to occur, evolution would be falsified.

It's amazing what silly things you can say when you don't understand how evolution works.

 

[Wildswanderer]

Organic compounds aren't nothing. What are you talking about?

Where did they come from?

 

[Wildswanderer]

Dude! You believe in magic. There was no magic in abiogenesis.

Because it never happened.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Something from nothing again. Something or someone had to create the first energy or matter.

Oh, did it? And where did that something or someone come from?