Anti-choicers: this is the fruit of your labour

[SkepticThinker]

Your support of any abortion for any reason isn't justified by the one in a million exception where a mother may need a medical procedure to save her life.
And I'm quite sure that medical procedure would be allowed in Ohio once it was determined to be a medical necessity. No need for abortions to be legalized for that exception to exist.

One in a million? Are we just pulling stats out of our backsides now?
Roe v. Wade was overturned like, what, a couple of weeks ago? And already, right off the bat, here we are with a problem. A problem you don't seem to actually want to address, or comment on, or acknowledge. Instead you want to make up statistics about "one in a million" so you can wave it away and not have to think about it.

Get used to reading about this kind of stuff more and more as time goes on. This is what happens when people are more interested in pushing their views onto others without bothering to think through the consequences of those beliefs when carried out in the real world.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Who is disregarding the millions of aborted children for the sake of convenience?

Who is ignoring the thread topic for the sake of convenience and not having to think through tough issues that result from your belief system?

 

[Estro Felino]

Both are important. Can we not walk and chew gun at the same time?
In the case of the abortion, time is of the essence.

Exactly. Because once the abortion is done, the fetus DNA can be used to detect the perpetrator.

 

[9-10ths_Penguin]

One in a million? Are we just pulling stats out of our backsides now?

It's kind of his thing.

 

[SkepticThinker]

I see nothing about any medical necessity for the mother's survival in the article.

Please tell me you're joking. She's ten years old.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Oh my!! Every period should be an "unborn child" by your poor definition. All it would have taken was a little bit of sperm and we know that only a tiny fraction of a percentage of sperm ever gets anywhere close to an unfertilized ovum. Clearly that should have been a child.

Every sperm is sacred
Every sperm is great
If a sperm is wasted
God gets quite irate!

 

[SkepticThinker]

There you go losing the argument immediately with false claims. If one cannot use proper terminology to win a debate one has already as much as admitted that they are wrong.

And statistics pulled from one's backside.

 

[Wildswanderer]

One in a million? Are we just pulling stats out of our backsides now?
Roe v. Wade was overturned like, what, a couple of weeks ago? And already, right off the bat, here we are with a problem. A problem you don't seem to actually want to address, or comment on, or acknowledge. Instead you want to make up statistics about "one in a million" so you can wave it away and not have to think about it.

Get used to reading about this kind of stuff more and more as time goes on. This is what happens when people are more interested in pushing their views onto others without bothering to think through the consequences of those beliefs when carried out in the real world.

What problem? No one died. No one has any problem getting their baby aborted. What problem are you referring to?

 

[SkepticThinker]

You have shown no empathy for the millions who never got a chance to experience life outside the womb so I can't take you seriously.

And you've shown zero empathy for an actual birthed, living, breathing human child. Congrats.

 

[Wildswanderer]

It's kind of his thing.

Your thing is ignoring the obvious and focusing on the very rare exception that doesn't require a single abortion clinic to exist.

 

[SkepticThinker]

So you create another arbitrary line and pretend life starts there? How about no elective abortions?

Arbitrary? It was based on your example.

 

[Wildswanderer]

And you've shown zero empathy for an actual birthed, living, breathing human child. Congrats.

I have already explained that I am in favor of her seeing a doctor and doing what is recommended. So you are lying.

 

[9-10ths_Penguin]

I have already explained that I am in favor of her seeing a doctor and doing what is recommended. So you are lying.

So you oppose the Ohio law, then? What changes would you make to it?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Your thing is ignoring the obvious and focusing on the very rare exception that doesn't require a single abortion clinic to exist.

The problem for you is that you are unable to justify your opposition to every day abortions, most of which do not even involve a fetus and none of them to the point where one can even claim that a fetus is a person. The Bible does not support your . Consistent medical standards do not support you, even you do not support your own beliefs since you are unwilling to lose bodily autonomy in the same way that you demand women lose theirs.

 

[SkepticThinker]

What problem? No one died. No one has any problem getting their baby aborted. What problem are you referring to?

You don't see a problem here. Really? Seriously?

 

[SkepticThinker]

I have already explained that I am in favor of her seeing a doctor and doing what is recommended. So you are lying.

Your posts speak for themselves, dude. I'm not the first to point out your lack of empathy on the subject matter.

 

[Wildswanderer]

You don't see a problem here. Really? Seriously?

Where? Again show me where anyone is dying because they can't get an abortion.
I see a problem with 10 year olds being raped and I think easy access to abortion clinics helps the rapists. If someone has to visit a hospital there's going to be questions.

 

[9-10ths_Penguin]

Where? Again show me where anyone is dying because they can't get an abortion.

This study predicts an increase in 815 pregnancy-related deaths per year as a result of the overturning of Roe v. Wade.

This means that you and your fellow anti-choicers will have a 9/11-worth of dead pregnant people just under every 4 years.

Make that a 9/11-worth of death every year and a half if you count the fetuses as people.

I see a problem with 10 year olds being raped and I think easy access to abortion clinics helps the rapists. If someone has to visit a hospital there's going to be questions.

I honestly had no indication until just now that you see a problem with 10-year-olds being raped.

As I've pointed out, you have the same attitude toward consent and bodily autonomy that a rapist does, so the jury was out until you clarified.

 

[SkepticThinker]

This study predicts an increase in 815 pregnancy-related deaths per year as a result of the overturning of Roe v. Wade.

This means that you and your fellow anti-choicers will have a 9/11-worth of dead pregnant people just under every 4 years.

Make that a 9/11-worth of death every year and a half if you count the fetuses as people.


I honestly had no indication until just now that you see a problem with 10-year-olds being raped.

As I've pointed out, you have the same attitude toward consent and bodily autonomy that a rapist does, so the jury was out until you clarified.

This ^^^

 

[Wildswanderer]

As I've pointed out, you have the same attitude toward consent and bodily autonomy that a rapist does, s

Apparently being pro life now makes one a rapist. Thanks for clarifying that.