ratiocinator
Lightly seared on the reality grill.
I don't need to look clever , my work is clever and based on real time physics . All my work is based on past science and physics...
You don't appear to know anything at all about physics. Even the most basic, school level things seem to be a mystery to you.
Scientists can't challenge work that involves their work and corrections of their work .
It's actually easy to challenge your claims because they are mostly meaningless and devoid of evidence or any hint of reasoning. The only problem is that you don't even know enough to understand why it's so obviously wrong - and you've invested 12 years producing it, so it's only human nature to cling to it.
Besides my 1 over time equation works...
What equation? The one on the other thread just told us that 1 = 1 (i.e. meaningless). What do you mean by works? What testable predictions does it make, that are different from standard science? How many experiments have you done that confirm those predictions? How can if be falsified?
I have used maths in explaining the initial big bang energy .
So post it. Nothing you've posted to date explains anything.