Evidence for a god existing or not existing

[King Phenomenon]

That's a lot of words and totally ignored proving a God exists. Atheists have the advantage of being on the side of the logical default, and that's that any claim made is by default untrue until demonstrated true. Thus far no theist has demonstrated any gods exist outside of human imagination. So get to it.



The Tooth Fairy is used because it's an excellent example of a concept that is believed true by some humans, and is no less implausible than any god a believer can promote. Thus far no theists can provide any more evidence for their personal god than someone can for the Tooth Fairy. So why do adults reject the Tooth Fairy but not their god? Explain how it's rational and based on facts.

All theists know there is no “EVIDENCE”
It’s a dead end conversation

 

[Subduction Zone]

Ooh
What’s on the devils menu?

Devil?

 

[Twilight Hue]

After reading a bunch of post this past week, I've decided to create this thread and list all the evidence I found for a god existing and all the evidence for a god not existing.

For a god existing the evidence is...

For a god not existing the evidence is...


There you have it. Look all the evidence over. Compare all the evidence, debate it and see what you come up with. No need to thank me. Its all in a weeks work

# 2. Yep. I agree fully. The best evidence for God not existing.

 

[Twilight Hue]

Why is faith needed by some?

Probably because it's simply not believable otherwise.

 

[King Phenomenon]

Devil?

Yeah

 

[QuestioningMind]

After reading a bunch of post this past week, I've decided to create this thread and list all the evidence I found for a god existing and all the evidence for a god not existing.

For a god existing the evidence is...

For a god not existing the evidence is...


There you have it. Look all the evidence over. Compare all the evidence, debate it and see what you come up with. No need to thank me. Its all in a weeks work

The time to begin believing in something is when there is verifiable evidence that the something exists. To do otherwise would be to abandon logic and reasoned thought.

 

[King Phenomenon]

Probably because it's simply not believable otherwise.

I know it’s fact

 

[F1fan]

All theists know there is no “EVIDENCE”
It’s a dead end conversation

Somehow they manage to keep it going. Avoiding their obligation to prove their claims are true is the big category they enjoy talking about.

 

[King Phenomenon]

The time to begin believing in something is when there is verifiable evidence that the something exists. To do otherwise would be to abandon logic and reasoned thought.

Not quite

 

[King Phenomenon]

Somehow they manage to keep it going. Avoiding their obligation to prove their claims are true is the big category they enjoy talking about.

No obligation here

 

[Subduction Zone]

Yeah

Don't have one. Don't need one.

 

[King Phenomenon]

Somehow they manage to keep it going. Avoiding their obligation to prove their claims are true is the big category they enjoy talking about.

Seems like you’re the one who needs evidence

 

[RestlessSoul]

Science explains observed phenomenon. Science can't examine ideas like mythical beings.

But it can and does examine the mystery of being

 

[Twilight Hue]

I know it’s fact

So did Franz .

My favorite poster boy of faith.

 

[King Phenomenon]

So did Franz .

My favorite poster boy of faith.

I’m not franz

 

[QuestioningMind]

Not quite

Nope, it's never logical or reasonable to accept a significant claim as true without any evidence. It flies in the face of logic and reasonable thought.

 

[firedragon]

That's a lot of words and totally ignored proving a God exists.

Why should I "Ignore" or "Focus" on proving God exists when that was not what I was addressing? Can you please explain that need?

Atheists have the advantage of being on the side of the logical default,

That is "your truth". You believe that this is the logical default. But that is your "Faith statement", not a scientific, or socially researched generalisation or tested hypothesis. It is just "faith".

Thus far no theist has demonstrated any gods exist outside of human imagination. So get to it.

Your highness. Open a new thread and try to discuss decently and ask this question with some objectivity. Even though I know with this kind of personality you will reject anything and everything, I will engage.

The Tooth Fairy is used because it's an excellent example

Thats what most of the Atheistic apologists and evangelists keep saying. Its repeated like a mantra. "It is an excellent example". No its not. Maybe its an excellent example to analyse you and your type of faith, and you think others are all just like you.

You can keep building a 100 strawman arguments. It is just logically fallacious.

 

[Twilight Hue]

I’m not franz

You don't have to be.

 

[firedragon]

Militant atheism: calmly explaining to a fervent believer that they can't demonstrate their God exists outside of their imagination. Ouch.

I can see the person with the superiority complex has no intellect to go beyond his foundation. Try.

The psychology of religion does a good job of it.

Are you speaking from a theory perspective, hypothesis perspective or social research? Can you explain with some good analysis?

 

[RestlessSoul]

Somehow they manage to keep it going. Avoiding their obligation to prove their claims are true is the big category they enjoy talking about.

What obligation? In what way am I obligated to you?