Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
mental is obviously relating to mind and material is to less intelligence.What is mental capacity and material capacity?
in the scientific process, if we lost all the modern knowledge we had today, which would be more important in rediscovering it?
the mental capacity?
or
the material capacity?
???mental is obviously relating to mind and material is to less intelligence.
mental capacity in respect to having the ability to create, recreate and or to be innovative.
material capacity in the sense that material things having the ability to create, recreate, and/or to be innovative.
I think @ChristineM provided the simply answer in her post above.???
What's the difference? Knowledge is knowledge. And so far mental has not been shown to be separate from material.
and why doesn't it?That doesn't make any sense.
No its not. To hold that spirituality is a thing it must be imagined using the mentality, it is not the mentalitymentality is a synonym for spirituality.
in judaism spirit is literally mind. ruach - spirit = mindNo its not. To hold that spirituality is a thing it must be imagined using the mentality, it is not the mentality
Respectfully: Seichel = mind in Judaism.in judaism spirit is literally mind. ruach - spirit = mind
in judaism spirit is literally mind. ruach - spirit = mind
that is what it also implies in English
From late 14c. in alchemy as "volatile substance; distillate;" from c. 1500 as "substance capable of uniting the fixed and the volatile elements of the philosopher's stone." Hence spirits "volatile substance;" sense narrowed to "strong alcoholic liquor" by 1670s. This also is the sense in spirit level (1768). Also from mid-14c. as "character, disposition; way of thinking and feeling, state of mind; source of a human desire;" in Middle English freedom of spirit meant "freedom of choice." From late 14c. as "divine substance, divine mind, God;" also "Christ" or His divine nature; "the Holy Ghost; divine power;" also, "extension of divine power to man; inspiration, a charismatic state; charismatic power, especially of prophecy." Also "essential nature, essential quality." From 1580s in metaphoric sense "animation, vitality."
My mind isn't Jewish
Alchemy is discredited is woo
mind is not jewish or atheist. the word was influenced by previous understanding and usage.
your culture, like my culture, was influenced by past cultures, like it or not.
cooking isn't french any more/less than italian. its simply a different way of doing the same thing. in this case it was simply a different way of saying the same thing.
in judaism spirit is literally mind. ruach - spirit = mind
that is what it also implies in English
I don't know what you mean by material capacity.and why doesn't it?
alchemy is a science about mind, there are a lot of mystery cults that used such methods.You implied with your statement
Cooking is basic science,not alchemy
i explained to you.I don't know what you mean by material capacity.
I don't know what those are, so I can't say.in the scientific process, if we lost all the modern knowledge we had today, which would be more important in rediscovering it?
the mental capacity?
or
the material capacity?
Are you sure that's not the other way around?...but to clarify a word bias, mentality is a synonym for spirituality.
Yes (see Joseph Campbell); and symbolic things can create abstract and material things (see George Orwell).i explained to you.
can material things create other material things. can it recreate, can it generate creative things like symbolism, abstract ideas, et al.