Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
at the end of a thing does no thing come?
when the form returns to the formless will the no thing become one whole = O?
agreed but.......No, see the first law of thermodynamics.
A "thing" will decay to nothing but the atoms that formed the "thing" will still exist to be recycled. In this way we are all made up, to some extent, of dead people who have decayed to nothing
But what you are describing would violate the 1st Law of Thermodynamics.agreed but.......
atoms are made up of relational systems. they to can deteriorate. they to are created from deteriorated atoms that decayed to nothing.
so all things created become uncreated resolving to some other state of vibration.
no it doesn't. it simply dissolves into the more basic sub-atom thingnessBut what you are describing would violate the 1st Law of Thermodynamics.
Which is "Something" so disproves the question raised by this threadno it doesn't. it simply dissolves into the more basic sub-atom thingness
Which is "Something" so disproves the question raised by this thread
agreed but......
atoms are made up of relational systems. they to can deteriorate. they to are created from deteriorated atoms that decayed to nothing.
so all things created become uncreated resolving to some other state of vibration.
if there was a big bang, a moment when all was of one thing then there was no contrast for things. thus formless because to have form there has to be contrast
The correct answer to the question "What came before the Big Bang?" is, We don't know.if there was a big bang, a moment when all was of one thing then there was no contrast for things. thus formless because to have form there has to be contrast
try to stay on topic and stop making personal suggestions. they're not relevant to understanding one thing creates manyness and not be lost energy wise. energy is one thing that can manifest as manyness.Can i suggest to forward that to the perimeter institute. No, better still, the the Royal Swedish Academy of Science, there may be a Nobel prize in it for you
i don't have a god before or after. an absolute doesn't have a before and after like energy can't be created/destroyed. it just isThe correct answer to the question "What came before the Big Bang?" is, We don't know.
What was before your god?
Your overall problem is that you don't do that@ChristineM and @Altfish
your overall problem is the fact that you keep fixating on the form(s), relational systems. you want something concrete that you can define but really is indefinite. energy takes indefinite forms. you can't take a picture of it and say here, this is energy. this is it's form because that is untrue. energy is an action. an action that has no beginning, no ending, and no exact form. its a constant change, a paradox, an eternal flux.
try to stay on topic and stop making personal suggestions. they're not relevant to understanding one thing creates manyness and not be lost energy wise. energy is one thing that can manifest as manyness.
the law tells you that. it transforms trans means to go beyond and forms is obvious
No, trans, in this case means to change state.
@ChristineM and @Altfish
your overall problem is the fact that you keep fixating on the form(s), relational systems. you want something concrete that you can define but really is indefinite. energy takes indefinite forms. you can't take a picture of it and say here, this is energy. this is it's form because that is untrue. energy is an action. an action that has no beginning, no ending, and no exact form. its a constant change, a paradox, an eternal flux.
trans- | Search Online Etymology Dictionary
even using your definition to change state tells you that it is a constant state of change.
so energy isn't a form. its deverbal noun derived from what it is doing
but i do.Your overall problem is that you don't do that