Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I would think that the only people who need to know the name of someone who has committed a murder, would be the family who lost a loved one. It is not necessary for public to know
It's a very strange one that; not a clue why his name is being kept secret.
But we don't need to know who was murdered but that was plastered all over the media.
Yes i agree, to others, who was murdered or who did it is not important.
Who did it may be important because often people who had had lesser attacks by the same person will have the courage to come forward.
Well then they are affected by the person, but still it does not need to be public in newspapers or TV all around the globe.
That's not a good reason. The courts are separate from the government.
I assume they do the same with native Italians?
Does it matter who the person went on a date with? Would it be in the news if it was average Joe? No It would not, because that does not sell more newspapers or media does not gain off of it. Names and who they are, are published mostly so the news organizations can earn money from people being curious, not because it is important to know the name
WRONG - it appears the murderer could not be more native, he is a Maori.
But she obviously knows the killer - others may not realise, I'm sorry but it builds a picture, it is important that who the killer is is published
May it be that she does not judge the person (killer) and see something within the person that she like and has accepted that, yes the person may have killed someone but anyway she chooses to be with him? Maybe she thinks that everyone have done something bad in the past, but she focus on the present moment? I do not know, but it is wrong to judge her for her choices
I have no problem with them being anonymous until found guilty; but afterwards there has to be a very good reason.
Some year ago (about 6 i think) i worked as a barista in a coffeeshop, and at the time it has been a lot in the newspaper about a married couple who was found guilty in murders many years ago, when i was at work, suddenly the woman stand in front of me and ordering a coffee was the woman from the news. To me she was just a regular customer, and she ordered a coffee and something to eat. But in your mind, should i have refused her the coffee? Just because a judge had sentenced her to 20 years in jail many, many years ago? If the case had not been in the news that much, it would still not have mattered who she was, she was just a normal customer to me. No matter of i knew she might have done what she was charged of have done.