Shad
Veteran Member
Well how disturbing is this? Let me ask a few questions. If science has the answer for the theory of evolution why is it still a theory and why does science still exist? What I see that is ironic here is that the majority of Nobel prize winning scientists are christian while it seems to be those who follow the religion of athiesm and agnosticism try to use the theories behind science as a crutch to try prove that there is no God. Can science prove or not prove that there is a God? There is not one shred of data anywhere that has proved that there is no God. If so than why pretend that there is? From what I can read here the great pretenders are the ones supporting the OP of this very thread. To think otherwise is not to be very well informed.
You have to link the religion with the reason for the Nobel prize. If an award is for a development that isn't based on any religious view then your point is moot. You are ignoring other factors. Population figures. Economics. Environment. Social structure. Etc. Buddhists for example have not been the majority in developed nation-states while Christians are/have been (environment).
Theory has a different meaning in science.
Null hypothesis counters your argument from ignorance