As I've said before but you continually ignore to do because it can't be done because it's impossible.
What? Can't read this mess. You should have used the "Reply" button so people would know what you think who is ignoring you. If you are claiming that evolution is impossible you just put the burden of proof upon yourself.
Sans what evolution says. Show me a real life example in history or present day where any functional Design ever occurred by Random trial & error w/o Intelligent Designer.
Can't. Not because it is impossible. We can't do that because you have not properly defined your terms. What do you mean by "functional Design"? You need to give a working definition so that we can tell if something we are looking at is "functionally Designed" or not.
Same question for a computer program. See like DNA is except it repairs itself & reproduces itself & it's even 3D & can be read in. multiple directions. You can't do that either. Yet you claim you can't find any " rational" or "evidence". That certainly exposes your bias & your lack of honest research.
Complex is not evidence for design. This is a version of an argument from ignorance, a logical fallacy. If you could apply logic properly you would understand the errors that you are making.
That's fine. You have the individual right to let bias agenda run your life. The exception is when you state its done by an academic honesty which you've proven its nothing of the sort.
Oh my! Massive projection. Instead of smearing others why not learn the basics. Why not learn how to use the functions of this site?
Once you can prove to me real life situations like I've said then I'll believe macro evolution is possible. Micro is proven but it's a just so story that it builds up leading to macro. See your problem is evolution scientist hide so much of the truth from you you never hear it. You never hear how they pick & choice results they let out. They are so dishonest & that's not counting the proven frauds they still use to teach it.
Who cares what you believe? You want to be wrong. You won't even try to learn. We are just explaining how and why we know that you are wrong. Mostly because you use endless PRATT's and have no idea how to use logic properly.
Heck there have been so many experiments generating 50,000 & more of species directed by evolution & even with adaptations they never become anything besides what they originally are.
Of course. That is what the theory of evolution predicts. Once you are "something" you always remain that something. You are still an ape. Your ancestors did not evolve out of being apes. Your mother and father were apes, your grandfathers and grandmothers were apes, all the way back to the earliest of "apes" that is what you are. If we go further back we will simply have to say that like you all of your ancestors were mammals. Or do you think that you are not a mammal?
You see the same thing when using genetics to develop corn., wheat, roses dogs etc. You never get another species.
That is wrong. New species arise continually. We can even see speciation in action with ring species. Perhaps you do not know the meaning of the words that you use.
Miller- Usery was is a proven fraud. Funnier is as they've tried to create life with all their INTELLIGENT DESIGN those evolution scientist still can't produce life in the perfect lab setting but yet can snuggly tell us how it was created in an in perfect atmosphere which can't produce it now!!
Now that is actually a lie. On more than one level. The Miller-Urey experiment only set out to demonstrate that amino acids could form naturally. That was all that they tried to prove. Creationists at that time claimed even that was impossible. They still hate the fact that they were shown to be wrong, And not just once. When it was found that the atmosphere may not have been right the experiment was run again and again with various possible early Earth atmospheres. All of them produced amino acids. But that is the problem with science deniers. They know that they are wrong so they won't even admit to the smallest of facts that shows their errors:
Miller–Urey experiment - Wikipedia
Wake up out of your evolutionary programming & honestly look. But odds are you won't as you've continually proven. Your biased agenda & esp atheism is too important. Funny thing is. That doesn't determine truth.
More projection. People here have explained your errors to you. You are the one that is "programmed" from birth with myths. Tell me, why do you believe the myths of the Bible that were shown to be wrong long before Darwin came along?
Logic & common sense in experiments to show me the foundations evolution are built on is possible can't be done. But you refuse to see & admit the obvious. That's a sad commentary.
You do not appear to have the ability to reason logically. "Common sense" is never used in the sciences since that is a code term for one's own unsupported prejudices. People like you are amazed at how often "common sense" is shown to be wrong. Experiments all support the theory of evolution. But then you refuse to learn even the basics of science. I for one would gladly go over them with you. We don't even need to mention evolution. We can just discuss what science is, how it is done, and what and what is not evidence. I am betting that like all other creationists you will run away from this offer.
