Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Everyone's taste buds testifies to them that italian food is gross... the natural man rejects what the tongue would have us do - when I see a person claiming to love italian food, I see a natural man who is at war with their own palate , which is a state all of us find ourselves in at one point or another.
Don't know about that but one thing for sure, science is certainly not for blinded religious people who literally think that Adam was the first man created or that earth is less then 10000 years old.. I mean come on
Anyone who believes Adam was the first man inherently denies a belief in science because science and the facts of evolution state that there never was a "first" man. With only one man and one woman it's been proven that the gene pool would never be diverse enough for the ancestors to survive for very long, they would die out within a few generations if they were not killed sooner by wildlife or accident of some kind.
We evolved from apes, and the first humans (homo sapiens, modern-ish humans) evolved possibly around 100 000 years ago to 250 000 years ago. There was no "first man" or "first person" in the way the bible describes it.
Because I'm not trying to claim that all life on earth started with one man and one woman. That's literally, physically not possible. If every human on earth was killed right now, and there were only 2 left alive, Humans would die out completely within a few generations at the most. Species with far superior numbers have gone extinct, even since humans have been recording written data. Birth defects run rampant to the point that they can no longer survive or even breed, and then humanity would be gone forever.
This is why Adam cannot have been the first man. This isn't just an evolutionary argument, it covers multiple facets of science including biology and chemistry, as both of those are necessary for understanding the basic components of life that would ultimately lead to humanities extinction through genetic defects if only 2 humans were alive to breed.
Ignoring that much evidence, while it's right there, is proving that you don't really believe in what science has to offer, you are just picking and choosing what you think fits with your religious world view and sticking it where you want it to be. If you truly followed the knowledge of science, you wouldn't just shut down your mind to half of all of the sciences just because they disagree with a book.
Because I'm not trying to claim that all life on earth started with one man and one woman. .
Pigeon Chess any one?Your theory of evolution (concerning Human evolution from microscopic organisms) is still a theory..it is yet to be proven as fact.
Interesting...My God what a Joke...All life on earth came from Adam and Eve. (Guess they were ****tting animals ey?)
You are completly wrong in saying that.. All life on earth did not start through Adam. Adam was the first of Mankind (the Father of Mankind)..According to what your saying you think that I believe all the animal and organisms came from Adam? Thats the stupidest argument Ive read against Creationism..You should go educate yourself (not with the evolutionary material adopted by school syllabuses) into what other people believe before jumping to conclusions..
My God what a Joke...All life on earth came from Adam and Eve. (Guess they were ****tting animals ey?)
Pigeon Chess any one?
You know, there is actually, as far as i can recall, no evidence for why humans need to sleep, but we know that if they don't for a few weeks they actually might even die. Weird.
And we meet again..
Please give some more proof about these facts of Human evolution, Where is the missing link?
You have revealed not only your gross ignorance of science and evolution, but also your blatant refusal to learn about them.
Since I am not interested in your Pigeon Chess Challenge, I shall allow others, who have more patience and or free time, to once again attempt to educate you on these matters.
Fly on home now and claim your victory..
Humanity never had a "missing link" to apes
Here she is, but as this explains, there is not one missing link. Humans evolution divergence from apes came gradually over millions of years, with many many different transitional fossils, not one "missing link." Lucy is one of the best transitional fossils found yet though.
You have revealed not only your gross ignorance of science and evolution, but also your blatant refusal to learn about them.
Since I am not interested in your Pigeon Chess Challenge, I shall allow others, who have more patience and or free time, to once again attempt to educate you on these matters.
Fly on home now and claim your victory..
You are not interested in anything that you think shows your beliefs wrong.Same I wasnt interested in what you have to say and deny..
Have a good day tho
Peace and God Bless