The Sum of Awe
Brought to you by the moment that spacetime began.
Why does it seem like LHPers tend to interpret being Taboo to being Taboo towards a certain religion? Why not go against mainstream ethics in society, instead of a religious ethics?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I once debated whether child cannibalism or child rape was worse for the child's parents in a crowded mall surrounded by families with small children. Good day, good day...
Then again, that wasn't about taboo. That was intended to be a legitimate discussion that just happened to be in a taboo location.
Taboo as in discussing horrifying topics around children or the victims.What do you mean by taboo location?
The Last Messiah - Scratchpad Wiki Labs - Free wikis from WikiaIn everyday interaction, isolation is manifested in a general code of mutual silence: primarily toward children, so these are not at once scared senseless by the life they have just begun, but retain their illusions until they can afford to lose them.
Why does it seem like LHPers tend to interpret being Taboo to being Taboo towards a certain religion? Why not go against mainstream ethics in society, instead of a religious ethics?
I suppose I can understand where you are getting this from, but I don't really see things that way. All taboos are relative to some particular cultural group, and religious groups are one such cultural group. Additionally, I feel like you're suggesting a stronger division between mainstream ethics and religious ethics than is actually there in practice. Christianity is the mainstream religion in America, and therefore Christian ethics are mainstream ethics. It's not all there is to mainstream ethics, but it's a huge component of it. I don't see this as an either-or.
I'm talking about what is incredibly frowned upon by the vast majority.
So... like murder, rape, theft, etc?
There are some taboos that are just self-defeating to violate. Things incredibly frowned upon by the vast majority of society tend to make you a social outcast at best, stuck on death row at worst.
Taboos are a funny thing really, but have nothing to do specifically with the LHP. I had a thread on this sometime back, but the gist of it was that it wasn't so important that you were rebelling against society but more importantly rebelling toward that which is either challenging or offending you. Mindlessly revolting against the norms isn't particularly LHP as it is just as mindless as attempting to blend in with the crowd. The LHP has always been about forging own destiny not merely acting up like a child. I guess a good question to ask yourself in the process is: If no one was here to watch what I did would I still be doing it? There you go... If you would do it anyway it is just your nature if you are just doing it to offend people or for shock value maybe you should estimate why you care about the pathetic praise of the horde.
There is definitely a point to be made here, but not the one you would expect.So... like murder, rape, theft, etc?
I don't really get this taboo breaking thing. I know it's part of some versions of Black Magic (can't remember the web site anymore) but that's nothing I really have any interest in. I can understand recognizing your own taboos and working with or against them as a way to learn more about your psyche and how to control it. Breaking someone else's just because you can falls (in the vast majority of cases) right under childish.