• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Freemasonry

filth,,,,,

but uh that's all the insight you have?

:sarcastic obviously not somethign you know about

I have answered your question, honestly, comprehensively, and directly. King Athelstan - apology? I have a very good memory old lad. Please try to be honest.
 
Last edited:
I think you are missing the point. We have been invited to peer into the elusive life of not only the freemasons, but the actual legitimate one, to which the claim that all others are bogus. An offer to talk about the genuine article.
It is laughable, plain and simple.

It is not societies like the Illuminati or Skull and Bones that personally bother me, or even this guy that claims to be the be all end all to freemasonry.

It is when an offer is made knowing good and well what will be asked of them, they will never answer serious questions. So again, why bother making the offer?

itwillend, please feel free to ask ANY question that you care to ask and I will answer it. Try not to judge people by your own standards and/or pre-conceived prejudices. Go for it, I challenge you and have nothing to fear. I will assist you to the very best of my ability.
 
Last edited:

Just_me_Mike

Well-Known Member
itwillend, please feel free to ask ANY question that you care to ask and I will answer it. Try not to judge people by your own standards and/or pre-conceived prejudices. Go for it, I challenge you and have nothing to fear. I will assist you to the very best of my ability.
Man I have just been messing with you. I didn't mean anything I said. I was just giving you a hard time, my little way of welcoming you to the forum.

On a different note, I do have a couple questions for you, but I'll start with this one first.

I use to live next door to the masonic temple in Alexandria Va. While living there I ran across an older gentleman who said quite a few things about the society. One of those things is that the highest level of the Masons are only concerned with world domination, but in such a way that is justifiable, and better left unexplained to the average citizen, because they would never understand why the means justifies the ends.

Any truth to that?
 
Well, in all humility, I must tell you that I am not a mind reader. Why didn't you ask this old gentleman what he meant?

All I can tell you is that this is what the original form of Free Masonry was, and is: Free Masonrie is where all men are called to the Priesthood, inspired by God, to instruct men. It is the very centre and source from which radiates the whole system of organized civil and ecclesiastical knowledge and practice, exerting a high standard of religion, justice and patriotism, and a code of moral teaching that will never cease to influence national character.

Perhaps this was his way of trying to explain his understanding of the Craft. This is my best shot. I believe that I have answered your question to the best of my ability, honestly and fully.
 
Last edited:

Just_me_Mike

Well-Known Member
Well, in all humility, I must tell you that I am not a mind reader. Why didn't you ask this old gentleman what he meant?

All I can tell you is that this is what the original form of Free Masonry was, and is: Free Masonrie is where all men are called to the Priesthood, inspired by God, to instruct men. It is the very centre and source from which radiates the whole system of organized civil and ecclesiastical knowledge and practice, exerting a high standard of religion, justice and patriotism, and a code of moral teaching that will never cease to influence national character.

Perhaps this was his way of trying to explain his understanding of the Craft. This is my best shot. I believe that I have answered your question to the best of my ability, honestly and fully.
Define priesthood, in your own words please.

Also do you deny that misunderstood bloodshed has resulted from the society? At the same time, do you acknowledge that money is the key to the civil and ecclesiastical practices to which you refer?
 
In the context of The Grand Lodge at York, a Priest is an initiate who has been anointed with divine authority. It takes a minimum of 10 years of hard work and learning, inspired by God, to qualify.

I do not understand your second question about bloodshed, asking for a denial. I will answer you if you would please explain it more clearly.

What has money got to do with anything? We are but the poor servants of God. We arrive on this earth penniless and we leave it penniless. Perhaps you will explain your point and I will do my best to answer this as well.

Please be specific, direct, plain speaking and to the point. I am not very good at word games.
 
Last edited:

darkendless

Guardian of Asgaard
Hehe Free Masonry. I've been recommended by 2 of my friends parents who are all above the 19th degree even though when we all sit down together all we do is argue like children :p They're pulling strings because i am under age (19), its as though they enjoy bickering :D

As ignorant as i am of this secret society i always find it amusing how conveniently everything in history has something to do with the free masons that my friends parents refuse to prove to me.
 
Hehe Free Masonry. I've been recommended by 2 of my friends parents who are all above the 19th degree even though when we all sit down together all we do is argue like children :p They're pulling strings because i am under age (19), its as though they enjoy bickering :D

As ignorant as i am of this secret society i always find it amusing how conveniently everything in history has something to do with the free masons that my friends parents refuse to prove to me.

When is Harry going to buy us a decent central defender to replace Ledley? That has nothing to do with the freemasons, that's Manchester City.
 
Last edited:

darkendless

Guardian of Asgaard
When is Harry going to buy us a decent central defender? That has nothing to do with the free masons.

Who knows. We're spoilt for choice up front and lacking in the back. Man U on the weekend will be interesting without Modric too :|

I know hardly anything about free masonry, when we talk its very very vague. I'm told by my grandfather (former free mason) that its the best thing i will ever do to meet people. Would you agree?
 
Yes I would. Take a look at our website and the website of the United Grand Lodge of England and see which one might suit you in the future. The fact that your grandfather was a Mason will hold you in very good stead.
 

Mr Cheese

Well-Known Member
I have answered your question, honestly, comprehensively, and directly. King Athelstan - apology? I have a very good memory old lad. Please try to be honest.

not really...

Why would I want to think of Aleister Crowley at all, especially as a Mason?

Free Masons are required to believe in one God, the Creator and Preserver of all things, and the immortality of souls. I don't believe that Mr Crowley complied with these requirements.

His religious philosophy was Thelema, based on the dictum, "Do what thou Wilt", and his "Book of Law" was Qabalistic, so he cannot be considered a Free Mason by any stretch of the imagination.


Crowley was a mason...

Free masons dont particpate in Qabbalah now?

:rolleyes:




So, my answer is this. Whatever he got up to is none of our business.

Really? For many masons he is an important figure...
I take it you have no opinion on tikkun Olam?

What do you think about him, as a Gnostic?

What do you think about King Athelstan? Myth, Legend or Fact?

__________________

The King existed, supposedly, for that I was wrong...however the premise of your lodge in connection to him is myth and legend...I cant remember the exact detaisl I read the other day during my research, but it was the same message in mutiple places.... but so what, again its akin to me saying my religion goes back to atlantis....

Yet your group goes back to a pre davidic 2005....apparently...

I have read you are a master mason....yet you dont consider qabbalah to be a part of masonary?:confused:

 

Mr Cheese

Well-Known Member
I kind of wondered the same thing, but I've been around here long enough to know that once you ask this question, your thread heads off to places you've never thought of.

Juast a point of interest, I find it interestign that LDS is a form of free masonary (shrug)
 
not really...

Why would I want to think of Aleister Crowley at all, especially as a Mason?

Free Masons are required to believe in one God, the Creator and Preserver of all things, and the immortality of souls. I don't believe that Mr Crowley complied with these requirements.

His religious philosophy was Thelema, based on the dictum, "Do what thou Wilt", and his "Book of Law" was Qabalistic, so he cannot be considered a Free Mason by any stretch of the imagination.


Crowley was a mason...

Free masons dont particpate in Qabbalah now?

:rolleyes:




So, my answer is this. Whatever he got up to is none of our business.

Really? For many masons he is an important figure...
I take it you have no opinion on tikkun Olam?

What do you think about him, as a Gnostic?

What do you think about King Athelstan? Myth, Legend or Fact?

__________________

The King existed, supposedly, for that I was wrong...however the premise of your lodge in connection to him is myth and legend...I cant remember the exact detaisl I read the other day during my research, but it was the same message in mutiple places.... but so what, again its akin to me saying my religion goes back to atlantis....

Yet your group goes back to a pre davidic 2005....apparently...

I have read you are a master mason....yet you dont consider qabbalah to be a part of masonary?:confused:

Look my friend, and I hope that we will be friends, I don't know what you are trying to prove, but please do not engage with me until you, at least, have a rudimentary knowledge of the subject of Freemasonry, particularly the Free Masonrie of Anglo-Saxon Britain.

1) Crowley was a Moderns mason (small "m") in some very dark and peculiar unofficial Qabbalistic nonsenses. Absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with pure and original Free Masonrie which was and is Exoteric and definitely not Esoteric. Even a very brief visit to our website would sort that one out for you. He is just about as important to genuine Free Masonrie as Donald Duck is to aluminium electro-arc welding.

2) King Athelstan: Stop listening to politically motivated biased idiots and start reading the raw history. There are literally hundreds of independent historical references on our website. Copies of Athelstan's Charter in the Anglo-Saxon tongue are in the King's Library at the British Museum, including the one penned by Richard Sankey for Elias Asmole for use at his initiation at Warrington in 1646. You can go along and see them at any time.

I know where my Masonic religion comes from thank you. My family has been deeply involved in it since the early 4th century.

3) I am not a Master Mason, I am a Fellow of the Craft of Free Masonrie, a High Priest and Grand Secretary of The Grand Lodge at York. We don't have Master Masons and never have. This is an invention by the profane and Godless Moderns heathen, Theophilus Desaguliers.

"Hiram Abiff was probably never heard of in a Lodge until after 1717... The legend of the Third Degree was introduced by the newcomers into Masonry ... (SOURCE: Albert Pike 1886, Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry by Charles Sumner Lobingier, 1932)
Where are you getting this utter nonsense from?

"From a Masonic document now in my possession, I can prove that no very long time ago the Culdees of York were Freemasons, that they constituted the Grand Lodge of England, and that they held their meetings in the Crypt under the great Cathedral of that city. The circular chapter-house did very well for ordinary business, but the Secret Mysteries were carried on in the crypts ... the Lodge, which was the Grand Lodge of All England had been held under the Cathedral in the Crypt at York." (SOURCE: Anacalypsis Vol. 1, p. 718 by Godfrey Higgins 1833-1836.)
"The Culdees of York was the name borne by the Canons Regular of St Peter's of York about AD 925." St Peter's of York, York Minster: Cathedral and Metropolitical Church of St Peter in York (SOURCE: p.615, Volume V07, Encyclopaedia Brittanica 11th edition, 1911)
The Culdees of York were among the guardians of the Masonic tradition in the tenth century, and the Old Charges tell us that an assembly of Masons was held at York during the reign of King Athelstan, when a reorganization of the Craft took place. (SOURCE: A New Encyclopaedia of Freemasonry (Ars Magna Latomorum) and of Cognate Instituted Mysteries: Their Rites, Literature, and History by Arthur Edward Waite, 1921)
"The circumstantial traditions of the period have it that from the congregations of the Culdees at York arose the early Masonic lodges of Britain to which King Athelstane, at the instigation of a member of his family, granted franchises or charters in 934. (SOURCE: Ancient Freemasonry: An Introduction to Masonic Archeology, The Culdees as Early Masons, by Frank Higgins, New York, 1923)
At their peak the Culdees were most prominent in Scotland where they had monasteries in St. Andrews, Dunkeld and Lochleven. They had members also in Ireland, but it is the body which established itself at York which most concerns us. These particular members of the order certainly interested themselves a great deal with the masons who were engaged in the building of the first Minster at York, of which they were in charge in the days of King Athelstan. Athelstan, son of Edward the Elder and grandson of Alfred the Great, was king between 925 & 941 AD. Himself a worshipper at York in the years around 936, he gave the Culdees certain grants of land as a thanks offering for his successes in battle, notably in subduing parts of Cornwall and Wales, and in 937, defeating the combined forces of the Welsh, Scots and Danes at Bruananburg. It is also reputed in the Old Masonic Charges that he granted a charter to the masons to hold an assembly every year. (SOURCE: The Roots of Freemasonry by Trevor Jenkins, Nautilus Lodge 4259, United Grand Lodge of England)
"Culdees are recorded in church documents as officiating at St Peter in York until AD 939. According to the same church authorities, the Canons of York were called "Culdees" as late as the reign of Henry II (AD 1133-1189) (SOURCE: The Traditions of Glastonbury by E. Raymond, Capt, MA, AIA, FSA Scot.)
"In England we find them (Culdees) as officiating clergy in the Cathedral Church of S. Peter at York during the reign of King Athelstan, who was so closely linked with English Masonic tradition." (SOURCE: Ancient Mystic Rites, p.118, by Charles Webster Leadbetter, 1926)
"Edward was succeeded, in 924, by his son, Athelstan, whose brother, Edwin, procured from the king a charter for masons, by which they were empowered to meet annually in a general assembly, and to have power to regulate their own order. And, according to this charter, the first grand lodge of England met at York, in 926. (SOURCE: A Freemason's Pocket Companion Containing a Brief Sketch of the History of Masonry, A Chronology of Interesting Events, etc. etc., by a Brother of the Apollo Lodge, 711, Oxford, Constitution of The United Grand Lodge of England, published by Henry Washbourne: London, also independently reported by The Mirror of Literature, Amusement and Instruction, Vol. 17, Issue 491, May 28 1831)
"After the establishment of the Kilwinning (c. AD 1140) and York Lodges (AD 926) the jurisdiction and antiquity of the Grand Lodge of York over other English Lodges has invariably been acknowledged by the whole Fraternity, the principles of Freemasonry rapidly spread throughout both Kingdoms and several Lodges were erected in different parts of the island." (SOURCE: A Brief History of Lodge Mother Kilwinning No. 0, Grand Lodge of Scotland, June 1944)
"That the charges and laws of the Free Masons have been seen and perused by our late Sovereign King Henry VI and by the Lords of his most honourable council, who have allowed them, and declared, That they be right good and reasonable to be holden, as they have been drawn out and collected from the records of auncient tymes," &c. &c." (SOURCE: Stowe's Survey, ch.V., p.215, Published According to Act of Parliament, 1754)
A Royal Charter, the only legal Masonic Charter in existence, enshrined in English Law and protected by Acts of Parliament. When you want more, just let me know.
 
Last edited:

Katzpur

Not your average Mormon
Juast a point of interest, I find it interestign that LDS is a form of free masonary (shrug)
Yeah, whatever. As if you, as a non-Mormon and a non-Mason even have a clue what you're talking about, aside from a few things you've read on either anti-LDS or anti-masonry websites.
 
The Mormon Church was organised upon Masonic lines and structures. It is based upon the Priesthood after the Order of Melchisadek. It is not Free Masonrie, per se.

I hope this helps and shows the benefit of asking questions rather than making rushed and ill-thought out statements.
 

Mr Cheese

Well-Known Member
Yeah, whatever. As if you, as a non-Mormon and a non-Mason even have a clue what you're talking about, aside from a few things you've read on either anti-LDS or anti-masonry websites.

well you both wear aprons
mormons have masonic symbols
you both have a temple
you both learn more about the "religion" as you go on....

Joseph Smith: America's Hermetic Prophet compares Joseph Smith to Hermetcism (which is masonary for some)

further:

Joseph Smith and Kabbalah: The Occult Connection

Figure 10. The 1650 edition of a thirteenth century alchemical work by Albertus Magnus contains one of the earliest allegorical representations of the key symbols later subsumed by both Masonry and Mormonism: the compass and square. Christ as Adam Kadmon appears within a sphere of light and dark, marked with the ubiquitous sun and moon, suggesting the complexio oppositorum manifest in creation. Within his body are encircled the four primal elements: fire, air, water, and earth. In the four corners of the madala are placed symbols of the divine work: the compass, the square and ruler, the scale of justice, and (perhaps) the vessel of chrism--an anointing oil of mercy balanced against the scale of justice. At the top appear the ten sacred numbers (represented also by the ten Sefiroth of Kabbalah) by which creation was mediated. Albertus Magnus, Philosophia naturalis (Basel, 1650).

JSKABF10.jpg




"While I would not diminish the inventive genius of Joseph Smith, careful reevaluation of historical data suggests there is both a poetic and an unsuspected factual substance to Bloom's thesis. Though yet little understood, from Joseph's adolescent years forward he had repeated, sometime intimate and arguably influential associations with distant legacies of Gnosticism conveyed by Kabbalah and Hermeticism--traditions intertwined in the Renaissance and nurtured through the reformative religious aspirations of three subsequent centuries. Though any sympathy Joseph held for old heresy was perhaps intrinsic to his nature rather than bred by association, the associations didexist. And they hold a rich context of meanings. Of course, the relative import of these interactions in Joseph Smith's history will remain problematic for historians; efforts to revision the Prophet in their light--or to reevaluate our methodology of understanding his history--may evoke a violently response from traditionalists. Nonetheless, these is substantial documentary evidence, material unexplored by Bloom or Mormon historians generally, supporting a much more direct Kabbalistic and Hermetic influences upon Smith and his doctrine of God than has previously been considered possible.
Through his associations with ceremonial magic as a young treasure seer, Smith contacted symbols and lore taken directly from Kabbalah. In his prophetic translation of sacred writ, his hermeneutic method was in nature Kabbalistic. With his initiation into Masonry, he entered a tradition born of the Hermetic-Kabbalistic tradition. These associations culminated in Nauvoo, the period of his most important doctrinal and ritual innovations. During these last years, he enjoyed friendship with a European Jew well-versed in the standard Kabbalistic works and possibly possessing in Nauvoo an extraordinary collection of Kabbalistic books and manuscripts. By 1844 Smith not only was cognizant of Kabbalah, but enlisted theosophic concepts taken directly from its principal text in his most important doctrinal sermon, the "King Follett Discourse."

Smith's concepts of God's plurality, his vision of God as anthropos, and his possession by the issue of sacred marriage, all might have been cross-fertilized by this intercourse with Kabbalistic theosophy--an occult relationship climaxing in Nauvoo. This is a complex thesis; its understanding requires exploration of an occult religious tradition spanning more that a millennium of Western history, an investigation that begins naturally with Kabbalah. "

By the late seventeenth century, several occult Hermetic brotherhoods, including Masonic and Rosicrucian societies, existed in England. The relationship these fraternities had to the first Grand Masonic Lodge organized at London in 1717 remains unclear. Although noting that "Masonry underwent gradual changes throughout a period of years stretching from well before 1717 to well after that date," modern authorities on Masonic history usually mark the beginnings of "speculative Masonry" to the decade following organization of this first Grand Lodge.66 Not long after this, around 1750, a specifically Rosicrucian order had been incorporated into French Masonry. Within the initiatory structure of the occult lodges, allegorical "mystery plays" were used to convey, through symbolic ritual, the grounding mythos of Masonry--a mythos which appears to have been fundamentally Hermetic-Kabbalistic.67 Though several renditions of Masonic history still emphasize the role of earlier "craft guilds" as a source of Freemasonry, relatively little evidence supports this claim. Even if one grants the existence of some linkage of eighteenth-century Masonry with earlier craft guilds, this does not diminish the molding force Hermeticism, alchemy and Rosicrucianism had on the fraternity's symbolic and philosophic development. (See Figure 10.) Simply put: Eighteenth-century Masonry was forcefully shaped by esoteric Hermetic-Kabbalistic traditions. While emphasizing this, I allow that several Masonic Lodges eventually evolved with less esoteric underpinnings and much simple fraternal intentions.
.....

Whatever one concludes about the varied hints of scattered early associations with Hermeticism, Joseph Smith had well-documented connections with one of the tradition's major legacies, Masonry. The prophet's associations with the Masonic tradition are thoroughly documented and discussed by Michael W. Homer in this issue of Dialogue. It is unlikely that Smith would have so fully involved himself and his church with the Masonic tradition if he had not sensed therein some intrinsic compatibility with his own religion-making vision. As Homer demonstrates, the prophet said that Masonry was "taken from priesthood," and his followers continued quoting that observation for fifty years after.104 It is possible that Joseph's interpretation of Masonry as a legacy of ancient priesthood was based in his own understanding of a history extending back hundreds of years, a history entwined with the Hermetic mythos and with Kabbalah, alchemy, and Rosicrucianism. The alliance of this occult legacy with Masonry was well understood by esoterically-inclined Masons; assertions of such links were bandied about by American anti-Masonic publications in the late 1820s.105 As noted, Joseph's own history several times touched Hermetic-Kabbalistic traditions. One could argue that he even interacted with them in a creative, visionary sense.

............
 

Mr Cheese

Well-Known Member
Its funny how the only place you can find the history you are spouting is from your own group's family....

Kinda liek using the bible to prove the bible...

I'm bored, I'm going to ask my masonic chums about you....
 
Are you talking at me? Ask them about this:

1717 - THE MYTH OF THE GOOSE AND GRIDIRON
Despite overwhelming evidence proving it to be a total fallacy, it is still claimed, and often repeated by Moderns freemasons that organised Free Masonry began in 1717 after a meeting in the tiny back room of a London Ale-house under the chairmanship of "a nameless person". Remarkably, this spurious claim for Masonic regularity and recognition is solely based upon alleged proceedings of an unauthorised, profane meeting. If this myth were true it would have rendered the perpetrators clandestine, the profane meeting being illegally staged within the Sovereign and legally chartered territory of The Grand Lodge at York.

"Upon enquiry it would appear, that all their boasted supremacy is derived from an obscure person, who lived about sixty-two years ago, and whose name is not to be found on record amongst Ancient or Modern Masons." ... "Such are the words of the most authentic history amongst Modern Masons, and beyond contradiction prove the origin of their supremacy to be a self-created assembly. Nor was a self-creation the only defect: They were defective in numbers. (SOURCE: Ahiman Rezon, by Laurence Dermott, Grand Secretary of the "Antients" Grand Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons According to the Old Institution, published by Southwick & Hardcastle, 2 Wall Street, New York, 1805)
"No records of any of the "Four Old Lodges" have been made known of a date prior to the London Grand Lodge era [1717]" (SOURCE: Freemasonry in the Early 1600's and 1700's by W.J. Hughan, Leicester, 25th January 1904)
"It is to be regretted that the records of the "Four Old Lodges" do not antedate those of the 'Grand Lodge', they brought into existence, as fortunately happens in the case of the single lodge which blossomed into the 'Grand Lodge of all England, held at York,' " (SOURCE: The History of Freemasonry, Vol. IV by Robert Freke Gould, 1884)
"The reality is that we have no written documents about the foundation of the first Grand Lodge in 1717, no evidence that the members of the four lodges meeting at the Goose and Gridiron Tavern were the successors of the operative stonemasonry which transmitted them its rituals. John Hamill (Chief Librarian of The United Grand Lodge of England) says that, ".... the analysis of the context in England at 1717 demonstrates that the operative lodges had disappeared since a long time. Whatever the four London lodges were at that time, it is established that they could not have been the successors of the Stonemasons' Lodges". (SOURCE: The Scottish Key. An Investigation into the Origins of Freemasonry, by Tristan Bourlard and François De Smet, SimonGo! Productions, 2007)
"Hiram Abiff was probably never heard of in a Lodge until after 1717... The legend of the Third Degree was introduced by the newcomers into Masonry ... (SOURCE: Albert Pike 1886, Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry by Charles Sumner Lobingier, 1932)
"The 1717 movement was not a "revival," as Anderson has it, and recent writers contend it to have been. REVOLUTION is the proper term, as it was the culmination of revolutionary movements commenced more than one hundred and fifty years prior, and continued through all those years to gain the end aimed at. The movements subsequent to 1717 prove it, as the course pursued by the new Grand Lodge towards the York Grand Lodge was of the same character as before the revolution. The York Grand Lodge cannot be ignored, as Anderson and some writers of the present day aim to do. It has a record prior to 1717 and subsequent ..." (SOURCE: Freemasonry in England from 1567 to 1813, London Grand Lodges, p.17, by Leon Hyneman, 1877)
"Preston is decidedly more full and clear than Anderson, although both wrote in the interests of the London Grand Lodge, yet not with the same bias of feeling. Anderson was one of the originators of the London Grand Lodge, and as a man of strong prejudices he was biased in all his inditings, evidences of which are seen throughout his two publications on every possible occasion, in the omission of historical facts, or giving the contrary construction to, and diverting attention in cases reflecting unfavourably upon the New Grand Lodge. The Books of Anderson, however, are almost universally accepted by the Masonic fraternity as containing a true history of Freemasonry, at least from the time our review commences, and the Ancient Charges, especially those contained in the 1723 edition, are as generally adopted as the fundamental law and basis of Masonic principles. But notwithstanding Anderson's Books of Constitutions were published by order of the London Grand Lodge, with its approval and sanction, yet no more untrustworthy, unreliable books were ever printed under the direction of any organised association. We affirm that Anderson is not to be credited. The Books of Constitutions were written purposely to deceive, to mislead and misrepresent facts as they existed; and if his reports of Grand Lodge Proceedings are true copies of Grand Lodge Records, then the records were corrupted with the design to mislead the reader." (SOURCE: Freemasonry in England from 1567 to 1813, Ancient York and London Grand Lodges , pages 15 and 16, by Leon Hyneman, 1877)
1) Ask them to provide you with a single record of any one of the so-called "four old lodges" prior to the 24th June 1717.
2) Ask them for a copy of the minutes of the alleged meeting at the Goose and Gridiron Ale-house on the 24th June 1717, or if not a simple list of any initiated freemasons who attended.
3) Ask them who chaired the meeting.
4) Ask them for a copy of their Charter.
5) Ask them to explain this:

"The Earl of Crawford seems to have made the first encroachment on the jurisdiction of the Grand Lodge in the city of York, by constituting two lodges within their district; and by granting, without their consent, three deputations, one for Lancashire, a second for Durham, and a third for Northumberland. This circumstance the Grand Lodge of York highly resented ..." (SOURCE: Illustrations of Masonry by Dr William Preston, 1772)

"In 1735, the Earl of Crawford, Grand Master of England, constituted two Lodges within the jurisdiction of the York Grand Lodge and granted, without its consent, Deputations for Lancashire, Durham and Northumberland. (SOURCE: Encyclopaedia of Freemasonry Part 1, page 327, by Albert Gallatin Mackey and H.L. Haywood, 1909)
Now that you know what a myth and a legend really are, I can't wait for you to come back to let us know what they said and for the answers to the list of questions that I have given you.

 
Last edited:
Top