I found this on facebook. Wish I'd written it.
An Atheist’s Open Letter to Those Praying for His Son | Divided Under God
Frankly, when I hear, "i'm praying for you , my skin crawls."
Obviously, I wouldn't critique that guy's letter to his face. He wrote in a time of trouble, and still did a good job being polite to those with whom he disagreed. It's not a moment in his life when he needs or is in a position to respond to philosophical debate.
But in the abstract, he makes a lot of the same erroneous presumptions about religion and prayer that many atheists do. He seems to imply that there is a choice: either praying for an ill person's health, or, alternatively, utilizing science and medicine to help them. But very few religious people outside of certain sects of Christianity and some extreme fundamentalists in various religions, would presume such a dichotomy. For most, prayer is something one does
in addition to use of science and medicine.
While I can't speak for how Christians or Muslims would illustrate that point, in Judaism, we are taught that human wisdom is a gift from God. Part of how God sends us support and help is by inspiring human beings to have the commitment, compassion, fortitude, and brilliance to become doctors and scientists, so that we can help one another using His gifts. Prayer for the health of the ill may be answered in the form of excellent doctors and nurses and researchers and whatnot. But we pray for a little extra something, also, if possible-- just as a wish over and above our confidence in our fellow human beings-- just to do everything we can. Sort of a spiritual dotting of the i's and crossing of the t's, if you will.
And prayer certainly is no replacement for charity, both in terms of financial donations and in terms of volunteering one's time. Such a concept is wholly foreign to Judaism, and if I had to guess, is probably also wholly foreign to non-fundamentalist Christianity and Islam, also.
He makes a number of other theological presumptions, all of which reflect fundamentalist, literalist, even perhaps extremist conceptions of God. And if they were directed specifically at fundamentalist and extremist religious individuals and groups, I could not argue with them. But, like many atheists, he directs his critique at religion as a whole, appearing to either not know or not care that most religious people are not fundamentalists or strict literalists or theological extremists.
I certainly don't care that this guy is an atheist. People should believe whatever they want to believe. And having been the subject of unwanted proselytization efforts by fundamentalist Christians, I am also sympathetic to how annoying it can be, and especially irksome when they are condescending. But atheists who vociferously reject all religion in reaction to very specific theological concepts which are by no means universal to all religion, and thus conflate all religious belief into what amounts to the fundamentalist Christianity common to right-wing America, really have little credibility to their arguments, from my point of view.