Rainbow Mage
Lib Democrat/Agnostic/Epicurean-ish/Buddhist-ish
Set- Benevolent, evil, devil, good, loyal, just, bi-sexual, infertile. I have heard all of these said about our beloved Set. Which do you hold to be true? What's YOUR perspective on Set?
I'll start- That Set is an evil god, but not evil in the way Abrahamics often use the word. Set's evil serves a necessary purpose, balancing the universe, punishing wrong doers, testing people, breaking down the old to make way for the new, etc. I have also seen a side of Set that seems to be somewhat caring, kind of "the devil may care". I also think Set probably is bi-sexual, because the deity Ash, also depicted with the head of the Set animal, was sometimes said to be Set's male consort in addition to Nebt-het.
I'll start- That Set is an evil god, but not evil in the way Abrahamics often use the word. Set's evil serves a necessary purpose, balancing the universe, punishing wrong doers, testing people, breaking down the old to make way for the new, etc. I have also seen a side of Set that seems to be somewhat caring, kind of "the devil may care". I also think Set probably is bi-sexual, because the deity Ash, also depicted with the head of the Set animal, was sometimes said to be Set's male consort in addition to Nebt-het.