If this is the case, why bother trying to save single deer? Shouldn't you become the "natural predator" of the deer to keep the rest healthy?
Did you read the article or what I said in the OP? Do you understand that the state is basically saying "either release these deer into the wild (where they will not survive because they're tame and one of them is blind) or murder them?"
No, the question is "why bother condemning them to death when a wildlife rehabilitator is willing to care to them for their entire lives?"