Is science against the Revealed Religion?

[LegionOnomaMoi]

Does that science say?

Science can't speak English (or any other language). Scientists do, and scientific literature reflects what scientists say.

 

[paarsurrey]

3 It's some religious beliefs that are against science.

That could have been misunderstood or misinterpreted by people.
Regards

 

[LegionOnomaMoi]

That could have been misunderstood or misinterpreted by people.
Regards

And questions about what "science" is against aren't at least equally problematic?

 

[paarsurrey]

If said religion is inherently contradicted by certain obvious conclusions(like saying the earth is flat, light is instantaneous, only 6k years old, ect) then yeah, probably, but that's because the religion in question is simply either woefully misinterpreted or is an outright fabrication(hello, $cientology).

The revealed religion does not present anything like that; it is not its core belief;such things are only peripheral and mostly misconstrued.
Regards

 

[paarsurrey]

And questions about what "science" is against aren't at least equally problematic?

I could not get you exactly. Please elaborate.
Regards

 

[Terrywoodenpic]

Science "reveals" Scientific facts far better than any "revealed" religious scripture.
However science has, so far, been very poor at "Revealing" acts of God.

Science is not in the business of confounding religious belief.
However, religious belief, has a very hard time when it strays into any field of science.

 

[paarsurrey]

Science "reveals" Scientific facts far better than any "revealed" religious scripture.

Science reveals or discovers things that already exist in this universe. Religion does not deal in scientific facts.
Regards

 

[paarsurrey]

However science has, so far, been very poor at "Revealing" acts of God.

I don't agree with you.
Science only reveals Works of G-d.
Regards

 

[paarsurrey]

Science is not in the business of confounding religious belief.

I agree with you.
Regards

 

[paarsurrey]

However, religious belief, has a very hard time when it strays into any field of science

Religion does not stray into field of science.
Regards

 

[LegionOnomaMoi]

I could not get you exactly. Please elaborate.
Regards

Science isn't an entity capable of being for or against anything. Scientific research is, as are scientists.

 

[Terrywoodenpic]

Religion does not stray into field of science.
Regards

I wish that were true.
The Bible recounts many events, including the account of the creation, that are not scientifically true or factual.

 

[Nietzsche]

Science "reveals" Scientific facts far better than any "revealed" religious scripture.
However science has, so far, been very poor at "Revealing" acts of God.

Science is not in the business of confounding religious belief.
However, religious belief, has a very hard time when it strays into any field of science.

Confounding or confirming, I think it'd be best to say.

 

[paarsurrey]

I wish that were true.
The Bible recounts many events, including the account of the creation, that are not scientifically true or factual.

It is wrong understanding or wrong interpretation.
Does Bible claim that it is a book of science? Why look for science in it?
Regards

 

[LegionOnomaMoi]

I agree. Science has no authorized spokesperson/s, it doesn't hear or speak of its own.
Regards

That's not what I implied. You set up a strawman (this singular "science") and knocked it down by addressing a lie you devised.

 

[LuisDantas]

Is there any ambiguity in it? Please
Regards

Not so much an ambiguity as an unstated yet IMO faulty premise.

Science can't very well be for or against revealed religion.

It can refute or validate specific religious claims, but that is about the closest that it can go.

It is actually philosophy, particularly ethics, that can challenge revealed religions by pointing out the inconsistencies of their proposed scriptures and deities.

 

[Terrywoodenpic]

It is wrong understanding or wrong interpretation.
Does Bible claim that it is a book of science? Why look for science in it?
Regards

The Bible claims nothing about anything.
However PEOPLE make claims about what is in it.
And creationists claim creationism should be taught as a science in schools.

 

[LuisDantas]

I am not proposing any experiments. I hear people say that science is against religion, I just want to see if it is so.
Regards

That is usually a misunderstanding or a straight misrepresentation. It happens often in Creationism.

 

[paarsurrey]

However PEOPLE make claims about what is in it.

It is their mistake; unless Bible claims as such and gives rational reasons for that.
Regards

 

[paarsurrey]

That's not what I implied. You set up a strawman (this singular "science") and knocked it down by addressing a lie you devised.

Since you did not imply it as you have stated, I have deleted my post.
Regards