Why is it that people who "talk to God" are considered normal and psychologically sound, while those who talk to God and then claim that God responded are considered mentally ill by most psychiatrists? It seems to me that communication should be two-way, meaning that repeatedly talking to an entity that never responds is psychologically unsound. Just an idea.
Hmm, many belief systems view it as a, "as above so below", concept rather than fitting your "exclusive or" case. That's to say, we are divine and part of it -- thus, "God" hears anything we think of in the first place. Even if no one else did, we heard it, and thus act is though "God" did. I find this amusing, as people don't actually know how true that is. The games!
Anyway, it is not nearly as unhealthy to be talking to ones gods as it is to blame oneself for every bad thing that happens in life since you have no one else to blame at that point.
Besides, you act like psychiatry is a real science when it's more like a panel of a jury... What is a an illness changes with the winds... Or, is it simply that people who don't share your views are "ill"? Either you're the smartest guy on the earth, or... I'd strongly suggest you evaluate your positions carefully.