paarsurrey
Veteran Member
I'm not saying that humans know better than God - quite the opposite.
Then it is OK with me.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I'm not saying that humans know better than God - quite the opposite.
I know only of the bible wherein the notion of the POWER OF CHOICE was given to man. Now the power of choice is one of the many powers that God has (remember that He is omnipotent), and this He bestowed to man. He kept all other powers to himself. Was He in the wrong when he gave this power to man? Or was He confused?
We can conclude from this that:
The power of choice was given to man because there existed themes, objectives, agendas, etc, that were, as you put it 'symmetrical'. man was given the power to choose between one thing or its other symmetrical half. God represents peace, love, harmony, light, good, etc. The opposite is the symmetry of God - sin, evil, satan, hate, anarchy, etc.
Man is the instrument that demarcates between God and its symmetry. What we live through in the world in the past, today or in the future reflects the choices that we made or make or are making regarding the whole. Because we were made to be the demarcation between God and its symmetrical half, we cannot live, at our present form, in the WHOLE. This is just impossible.
In seeing this impossibility, God created an instrument in man called the MIND and placed this in him. The mind is able to see and roam in the WHOLE and then quickens the body to act according to the computations of combinations and permutations it requires of the various symmetrical halves of God and its symmetry
Remember: GOD IS OMNIPRESENT, OMNIPOTENT, OMNISCIENT. HE IS THE WHOLE. HE IS THE COMPLETE. HE IS THE UNITY.
Interesting post! I want to 'challenge' the above part ... Given that the nature of what we're pondering mostly doesn't seem to be "knowable" by humans, and, the fact that the Bible was written by humans - how can we be truly sure about any of the above? Me making this point doesn't reflect on my beliefs - I'm very much a believer. In what, I'm not so sure.
We might as well also acknowledge that Muslims, too, accept Christ as a prophet, but not as the son of God.
I'm interested in a grand unified theory of everything. But not only for science. For everything. The shortest way I can summarize my efforts so far is this:
Everything is what it is, and is also the opposite of what it is, at the same time. Everything we experience is symmetrical waves on an otherwise still pool. This explains everything.
I respect the goal and purpose of the thread here, it is something that I think would be awesome to explain short and sweetly yet at the same time it is something requires a couple of large posts to get into.
Everything is what it is,
Yes! it is also the opposite of what it is, at the same time for a abnormal/Spiritual person.and is also the opposite of what it is, at the same time.
Yes! still pool of love.Everything we experience is symmetrical waves on an otherwise still pool.
Yes! this explains everything to a abnormal person.This explains everything.
... it would be easy to conjure such things as it being a way to bring forth a more universal peace or further segregation or whatever else follows appropriately.
People that are more likely to listen, perhaps they are more like you and I.
New or different, depends on what you have been exposed to.
In terms of having any ideas, a universal theory is magical, influential beyond all grasps of comprehension. In addition, it is oppositional, like two sides to a coin. The dualistic references can only be referenced through a singular existence.