Embarrassing.
This crackpot, calling himself a scientist, obviously has no clue how natural selection works, and knows nothing about biology on top of that.
The net, or magisterium, of science covers the empirical realm: what is the universe made of (fact) and why does it work this way (theory). The magisterium of religion extends over questions of ultimate meaning and moral value. These two magisteria do not overlap, nor do they encompass all...
You are desperately arguing in circles
Again, they are not MANY, as I have already proven to you. They are less than 1%, which doesn't in any way change the scientific consensus that the Theory of Evolution is "one of the most reliable and empirically tested theories in science."
Sources...
They are called pseudo-scientists. You should start using this word more.
Sources:
1. The scientific community considers intelligent design to be "unscientific", "pseudoscience" and "junk science".
1.1 (NSTA Pressroom
1.2 JCI - Defending science education against intelligent design: a call to...
As far as science is concerned, the Theory of Evolution is AS "PROVEN" as any of the theories I listed above. Forget about particular experiments and particular observations, I am telling you how modern science works.
It is logically impossible ONLY ONE of these theories to be "UNPROVEN."...
I will completely ignore the fact that a theory by definition CANNOT be simply "proven" or "unproven." A scientific theory is the comprehensive explanation of natural phenomena, consisting of a large body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment.
In any...
And this philosopher's conclusions put put the nail in the coffin of 150 years worth of work by millions of biologists, geneticists and anthropologists all over the world?
How about the "Earth Is Round" propaganda machine, where do you stand on that?
Having read about 40 pages of this discussion, I am not sure you even know what "science" means and what the word "scientific" entails.