Unless you can prove otherwise - he just did. You see, that's how a debate works. He came at you with an argument, you said you proved him wrong by saying absolutely nothing, and when called out on it - this is your response.
Well...well....well....even though I said I proved him wrong uh uh uh...
But there hasn't always been intelligence as you are defining it even with living beings so how does that constitute an intelligent creator?
If anything, it would constitute a chameleon like creator. A creator that is adaptable not one that would make us wait hundreds of thousands of years to...
A safer one? It's the Internet and rather than address my question - you ignore it and say it isn't relevant although you brought it up. Time to hit the ignore button on you. If I wanted to feel less intelligent - I'd do drugs.
It is relevant because you still didn't tell me which you really meant and NOW you are saying "let's say he was to sin" which is to imply "I don't know if he did but IF he did - he can repent."
You are all over the place and I think it's hilarious especially how you now say it isn't relevant...