Ok, if they broke the door, it was wrong and violent.
IF? It's on video, and these people were identified and charged. That other fools walked is AFTER the doors being broken does not suggest they were not aware of them taking advantage of a crime already committed in front of them. As I said the smart people (this is not to say that any of the Jan 6 attendies are smart at all since they were manipulated and believed Trump's lies about election fraud) did not attack the police, and did not enter the Capitol when it was closed to the public for official business.
And I also agree that there were other violence outside the building,
It's a fact, it's not something to believe or agree with. There is vidoe of the violence. All I can discern is that you are completely brainwashed about the day's event.
after the protesters were shot with rubber bullets.
Show us reporting that this was done. I've only seen reporting of police using tear gas and flashbangs. No right wing disinformation media.
I don't think there is any intelligent reason to call it a coup attempt of insurrection, especially because no such plan from anyone, and no credible evidence for such.
Why, because it failed?
There was already Trump conspirators trying to challenge election results in swing states, and many of these folks have been indicted. That is a coup. That they were trying to use the system to do the coup does not get these people off the hook. John Eastman, Gulliani, Clarke, powell, Chesboro, and other lawyers have been indicted, and most disbarred or in the process of disbarrment for their part in these crimes against the USA.
From a knife attack? Ultra credible.
She and others werte breaking in. The security did not know what weapons they had. The rioters were being warned over and over again, and she didn't listen. That's on her.
Maybe she listened Ray Epps who is the only one inciting the "coup".
If she listened to you she still would have been shot, because you aren't blaming her for ignoring the warnings of security who had their guns drawn.
You seriously claim that polices with guns, could not defend themselves from unarmed people, who made nothing indicating violence, inside the house?
The police were outnumbered. Some of the officers said they wanted to defend themselves against the rioters but worried they might be swarmed and killed. If this doesn't make sense to you then I don't know who's side you are on. You sound like you are against democracy, against the police, and pro Trump and criminal conspiracy. Given me an explanation for your comments and attitudes.
If it was a serious attack, they could have kept the door shut and not open it.
The doors were closed and locked. Why not watch video of the rioters breaking the doors and windows. And remember, the police were outnumbered and overwhelmed by a mob who had weapons.
But, clearly they thought there was nothing serious,
Watch the videos. And watch testimonies by the police from that day. Then you will be informed. You clearly aren't.
because they let them in and were peacefully with them.
No, the testimony by the police was that the mob overwhelmed the police and all they could do is try to herd them away from members of congress as they evaculated. Remember that the rioters got into offices and the Senate chamber. Security held off the rioters at the House door.
If there would have been some real coup attempt, they would have shot everyone in the house.
The rioters didn't get into the House chamber, and one of the rioters was shot and killed for trying. Members of congress were still in the House chamber and were in fear for their lives.
It's astounding how poorly informed you are, yet still post opinions on an open forum where you can be fact checked.
