• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Irony of the evolutionary belief

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
In other words, no answer...because the "experts" are right, just as the doctors thought they were during Dr. Semmelweis's time. And people believed them because they were the "experts."
No, you keep saying this and you keep being corrected on it. It is because all of the evidence shows that he is wrong. Experts find the evidence, but once found almost anyone can understand it.
 

Banach-Tarski Paradox

Active Member
If, according to evolutionists, human intelligence eventually emerged in an environment that was previously lifeless for millions and millions of years... what is so strange that a Superior Intelligence has already existed for another INFINITE number of years BEFORE that period of time? :cool:

According to evolutionists, culture and religion evolve.
 

YoursTrue

Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
Start Here;
Show possible intermediaries for tiktaalik. How long do scientists think it took to get from fish to tiktaalik?
 

YoursTrue

Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
Start Here;
In other words, you can't say...
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Show possible intermediaries for tiktaalik. How long do scientists think it took to get from fish to tiktaalik?
If you want a really good source that explains evolution at a layman level Aron Ra did a 50 video series that covers just about any question that you can think of. And he is not dull dry and boring. He gives you the latest science that is known. He gives fossil examples once you get past the start of life. Everything that you need is in his series. I can post you a link to it if you like. Binge watch it and you will be done in just a few days.
 

Dan From Smithville

Monsters! Monsters from the id! Forbidden Planet
Staff member
Premium Member
They are different things but both are lies, that's the main point to consider here
You claim this. You repeat the claims ad nauseum. You never support, explain or demonstrate your position. The best you have are sad excuses blaming others for your failure to do more than offer empty, unverified claims.
 

Dan From Smithville

Monsters! Monsters from the id! Forbidden Planet
Staff member
Premium Member
I don't know the truth but I know your avatar, you are pretending to be Shutterstock
Photo Description

Stock Photo ID: 1043486863

Bearded man. Portrait of masculinity. Stylish hipster brutal man with beard, mustache, beautiful hairstyle. Serious unshaven man. Sexy look of male model. Advertising barbershop concept. Copy space.​


LOL
I'm always curious at the avatars people choose. Some probably choose out of whimsy and some with more purpose, but I doubt many choose an image at random. I think the bearded man was chosen with purpose. I chose mine with purpose. What is more intimidating than a fierce and vicious bunny. Those things will tear your arm off, so you know when you're dealing with me, you are to be intimidated by my avatar.
 

Pogo

Well-Known Member
Show possible intermediaries for tiktaalik. How long do scientists think it took to get from fish to tiktaalik?
haven't seen this one in a while, find a transitional and the trolls come back with "Now you have two gaps."
Probably another Chick Tract I have forgotten.
Reminds me of vintage trolls
shopping
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
But you still haven’t been capable of quoting an example of me getting something wrong from science.


Where is your list of my mistakes?


@McBell is waiting for it.
As noted, you get corrected by me and others continually. How do you not see it? I just corrected you about how you don't think predicitons follow models and facts in a hypothesis.

Just get science right. Why not try that for a change? You keep trying to convince well educated folks on your twisted belief about science. You have no clue how incorrect you are. I blame the negative influence of religion for those who are hostile towards science, and who also are defiant that they somehow know better than experts in science.
 
Top