• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

X-MEN movies are Gay AGENDA?

Did you know X-men movies were used to propagandize the Gay agenda?

  • Yes

    Votes: 2 13.3%
  • No

    Votes: 13 86.7%

  • Total voters
    15

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Gayism within Movies is when u see two gays/lesbians in bedscene or flirting.


In my opinion a heterosexual couple in bedscene is already too much pornographic material. What could be much worse is to see two lesbians/gays holding hands, let alone the bed action.


They should warn people though when there is some homosexual parts.

Or they can learn to get over their irrational, arbitrary hangups.
 

Harmonious

Well-Known Member
I think some might be missing the point.These X-Men movies are not supposed to show homosexual flirting or anything like that.It is done in a subtle way.In disguise so to speak.The director Brian Singer explains it in detail.There is a coming out scene.Mutant is code for gay.He makes this very clear.Also the don't ask don't tell reference in the movie.So it is not supposed to show gay scenes,as in kissing men, or things of that nature.It is a political stance on the matter.This movie is supposed to show the struggles a gay person has to overcome in order to gain acceptance.The video explains it all.
And I think YOU are missing the point. Yes, there is a "coming out" scene. And as I said, homosexuality is the prejudice that is bothering folks today.

Forty years ago, someone might have found out that they had a Mutant parent, not unlike people who secretly discovered that one parent had a black grandparent, or something. That might not have ultimately been a big deal, but it might have been enough to preclude someone from eating in a "white only" restaurant.

It's not about the struggles a GAY person has to overcome. It's about the struggles the OTHER person has to overcome in order to gain acceptance. And this decade, the evil "other" that is being disputed are homosexuals.

And the video is creepy, vile, and makes some interesting conclusions based on propaganda pamphlets and quotes taken out of context. And if you intellectually buy the whole "the gays are taking over Hollywood" and whatever, I believe you might enjoy a copy of Mein Kampf. Or even, "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion." They might equally appeal intellectually to you.
 
And I think YOU are missing the point. Yes, there is a "coming out" scene. And as I said, homosexuality is the prejudice that is bothering folks today.

Forty years ago, someone might have found out that they had a Mutant parent, not unlike people who secretly discovered that one parent had a black grandparent, or something. That might not have ultimately been a big deal, but it might have been enough to preclude someone from eating in a "white only" restaurant.

It's not about the struggles a GAY person has to overcome. It's about the struggles the OTHER person has to overcome in order to gain acceptance. And this decade, the evil "other" that is being disputed are homosexuals.

And the video is creepy, vile, and makes some interesting conclusions based on propaganda pamphlets and quotes taken out of context. And if you intellectually buy the whole "the gays are taking over Hollywood" and whatever, I believe you might enjoy a copy of Mein Kampf. Or even, "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion." They might equally appeal intellectually to you.
Ok,thanks for your opinion.:)
 

MysticSang'ha

Big Squishy Hugger
Premium Member
And I think YOU are missing the point. Yes, there is a "coming out" scene. And as I said, homosexuality is the prejudice that is bothering folks today.

Forty years ago, someone might have found out that they had a Mutant parent, not unlike people who secretly discovered that one parent had a black grandparent, or something. That might not have ultimately been a big deal, but it might have been enough to preclude someone from eating in a "white only" restaurant.

It's not about the struggles a GAY person has to overcome. It's about the struggles the OTHER person has to overcome in order to gain acceptance. And this decade, the evil "other" that is being disputed are homosexuals.

And the video is creepy, vile, and makes some interesting conclusions based on propaganda pamphlets and quotes taken out of context. And if you intellectually buy the whole "the gays are taking over Hollywood" and whatever, I believe you might enjoy a copy of Mein Kampf. Or even, "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion." They might equally appeal intellectually to you.

So very well said!
 

Kilgore Trout

Misanthropic Humanist
Look at Professor Xavier's head. It's obviously nothing more than a thinly-veiled penis. And, what is his power? To control people with his giant penis-head. His power emanates from his penis and nobody can resist it. He even uses it to find and recruit "students." It's all right there if you just open your testicles...I mean your eyes.
 

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
I really hate videos like the OP brought up (no offense to you BibleStudent.) Of course movies bring about ideas subtly. They're storytellers, that's their job! EVERY medium, written, painted, sculpted, visual and everything in between does just that. Stories examine the human condition, but it's up to the audience to interpret them. Death of the author and all that jazz.
X-Men can be seen by some as an allegory to LGBTQI struggles, others can see it as just society being dickheads favoring segregation of anything different. It doesn't matter what the author/director/writer intended, that is what you as the audience member saw. And that is your job as said audience member. Art is a two way street.

As to the heinous allegations towards Mr Singer, if they were true may he rot in jail. But they're entirely irrelevant to whatever homosexual acceptance message he was supposedly promoting. The only reason it's brought up by anyone is because it's nothing more than a common deflection technique, used by snake oil salesmen for centuries. That remark conditions the audience into viewing that person (in this case Singer) in a less than honorable light, thus getting the audience to question that person's motivations. As someone studying journalism, I can say that that is the first thing we are taught to avoid. Because it's ultimately manipulative and seen as devoid of any sort of integrity whatsoever. People hoping to dupe the unwashed masses use such tactics, not people wanting to legitimately inform anyone of anything.

Even if X Men was in this gay agenda bull****, so what? Oh no, acceptance and treating people like people. The horror. /sarcasm.

Ughh, this video reminds me of those morons who got Noddy banned because he was gay with Bigears (lies, BigEars was obviously a eunuch who enjoyed China Doll on more than one occasion!!) :rolleyes:
. It's good to examine stories on a deeper level, just don't be an idiot about it.
 
I really hate videos like the OP brought up (no offense to you BibleStudent.) Of course movies bring about ideas subtly. They're storytellers, that's their job! EVERY medium, written, painted, sculpted, visual and everything in between does just that. Stories examine the human condition, but it's up to the audience to interpret them. Death of the author and all that jazz.
X-Men can be seen by some as an allegory to LGBTQI struggles, others can see it as just society being dickheads favoring segregation of anything different. It doesn't matter what the author/director/writer intended, that is what you as the audience member saw. And that is your job as said audience member. Art is a two way street.

As to the heinous allegations towards Mr Singer, if they were true may he rot in jail. But they're entirely irrelevant to whatever homosexual acceptance message he was supposedly promoting. The only reason it's brought up by anyone is because it's nothing more than a common deflection technique, used by snake oil salesmen for centuries. That remark conditions the audience into viewing that person (in this case Singer) in a less than honorable light, thus getting the audience to question that person's motivations. As someone studying journalism, I can say that that is the first thing we are taught to avoid. Because it's ultimately manipulative and seen as devoid of any sort of integrity whatsoever. People hoping to dupe the unwashed masses use such tactics, not people wanting to legitimately inform anyone of anything.

Even if X Men was in this gay agenda bull****, so what? Oh no, acceptance and treating people like people. The horror. /sarcasm.

Ughh, this video reminds me of those morons who got Noddy banned because he was gay with Bigears (lies, BigEars was obviously a eunuch who enjoyed China Doll on more than one occasion!!) :rolleyes:
. It's good to examine stories on a deeper level, just don't be an idiot about it.

No offense taken.everyone is entitled to their own opinions.:thumbsup:
 

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
No offense taken.everyone is entitled to their own opinions.:thumbsup:

Good.I am a little confused though. At first you seemed in favor of the video clip but then almost immediately refused to engage in the subsequent discussion. So are you indifferent to this news? Do you just want to sit back and let everyone carry on the discussion? Do you agree with it? Like you seem kind of apathetic towards the whole thing, except for your first post. So...........like what the hell man?
 
Top