taykair
Active Member
In the following generic post, the poster's unwritten thoughts are in parentheses:
The evidence for X is overwhelming (in my opinion). My personal beliefs have nothing whatsoever to do with the validity of X (that I'm willing to admit to). You have yet to provide any credible evidence that X is not so (credible meaning whatever I consider to be so). Your ad hominem attacks only show the weakness of your argument (you stupid swine). Your appeals to authority are likewise a weak argument (because Professor Y - or Reverend Z - told me so), as are your generalizations. (Why, oh why, are all you people so blind?) Of course, I'm willing to change my position if you can show me just one scrap of evidence to the contrary (yeah, that'll be the day).
The evidence for X is overwhelming (in my opinion). My personal beliefs have nothing whatsoever to do with the validity of X (that I'm willing to admit to). You have yet to provide any credible evidence that X is not so (credible meaning whatever I consider to be so). Your ad hominem attacks only show the weakness of your argument (you stupid swine). Your appeals to authority are likewise a weak argument (because Professor Y - or Reverend Z - told me so), as are your generalizations. (Why, oh why, are all you people so blind?) Of course, I'm willing to change my position if you can show me just one scrap of evidence to the contrary (yeah, that'll be the day).