Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Not in the myth. But if there was such a flood the whole world would have nothing on Arkansas.Did Adam, Eve, Cain, Noah's grandchildren experience a 'yuck' factor?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Not in the myth. But if there was such a flood the whole world would have nothing on Arkansas.Did Adam, Eve, Cain, Noah's grandchildren experience a 'yuck' factor?
No, nothing is consistent with any tall tale that requires water above the tallest mountain. That is seriously nonsense, seeing as how there were many thriving civilizations that were unaffected by this 'world wide' flood.In any case land and sea creatures fossilized in close proximity is consistent with the flood epoch.
We also see a high mix of dinosaur and mammals buried in the gobi dessert
You can't imagine any reason why ancient things and new things would be buried in the same place?In any case land and sea creatures fossilized in close proximity is consistent with the flood epoch.
We also see a high mix of dinosaur and mammals buried in the gobi dessert
But mammals had in any case evolved long before the end of the dinosaurs.You can't imagine any reason why ancient things and new things would be buried in the same place?
Megalodon? Aren't you glad those are not still sharing the waters with us?
Modern? well some animals have not changed... bees... spiders.. ants... and a horse is a horse of course of course...
And as you know most appear in the fossil record fully formed lacking history
(It's as if they were created. Imagine my surprise)
Yeah, the account says Jehovah God only gave Noah the instructions on how to build it...and He only brought all the animals to Noah...and He only closed the door.
And then, He only unleashed the waters above and below...
No need to believe that He protected Noah & his family and animals during the Flood. That's just too farfetched!
There was only one global flood however there could be many local floods
A short ice age following the global flood also makes sense
Do it! Show the world is better since 1913. I.e., before WWI
Late to the game here, but if I'm not mistaken, the shark species has been around for an extremely long time. It's one of the species in the world that has reached top of the predator echelon and have had very little selective pressure, which has caused it to have a huge variety of genetic diversity without changing it's body type or hunting skills. I can't be sure, but it might be possible that sharks existed in the Jurassic. After all, some of the oldest shark fossils are hundreds of millions of years old, while the dinosaurs were going extinct only some 60 million years ago.Hell Creek rock formation in Montana has both shark and T Rex fossils.
Seems to lean toward rather than against the Noah epic.
Data reported in the Journal of Paleontology pp1-19, 21 Jan 2019
What say you?
Indeed. The T rex was buried in sediments, from what was originally presumed to be a lake. However, having found these teeth, they now think it was a body of shallow water connected to a river or the sea, in which fresh water sharks were present.Late to the game here, but if I'm not mistaken, the shark species has been around for an extremely long time. It's one of the species in the world that has reached top of the predator echelon and have had very little selective pressure, which has caused it to have a huge variety of genetic diversity without changing it's body type or hunting skills. I can't be sure, but it might be possible that sharks existed in the Jurassic. After all, some of the oldest shark fossils are hundreds of millions of years old, while the dinosaurs were going extinct only some 60 million years ago.
Please! You can’t legislate attitudes! There are so many selfish & racist people! It doesn’t have to be state-sponsored to flourish.There's no more apartheid in the western world.
Even if we completely ignore all the other ethical accomplishments since then (like declaration of human rights, emancipation of women, etc), that alone in and of itself was already a massive improvement.
Cool story.
-how did they test the pinhead size parts of teeth to show they were from a shark? Oh it just looked similar.
-sharks live in salt water, how did they live in the fresh water stream/river? Oh I see. They stretched it that back then they could live in either.
-how did... Yeah I could throw a million questions into those assumptions.
While it's interesting, it's all assumptions. It wouldn't pass 13.
Are you aware that geology as a scientific field got kickstarted by a couple of christians that set out to find evidence to prove that the biblical flood was real, and that out of that failed effort geology as a science was born?
Currently there are over 40 active conflicts on Earth, affecting millions.
The truth of Jeremiah 10:23 is becoming more and more evident.
Man is imperfect therefore evolution is wrong?What's your point?
I assume Buckland is one, but I'm stumped as to the other one.Just who exactly are those couple of Christians?
I would not say that it was a "couple". For example one of the first laws of geology was written by a Christian, who was also a creationist. The law of superposition:Just who exactly are those couple of Christians?
To address the bullet points.....
The tooth isn't based on looks, it's based on DNA.
That's how they knew.
From the article itself regarding it's adaptability...
"....serves as another example of the diversification of this shark group not only in oceans worldwide, but also in the freshwater systems in the terrestrial environments near the end of the so-called ‘Age of Reptiles.’”
Stop listening to religion.
Study science.