That's a winner, Trail. The ONLY thing that somewhat convinces me that there is a higher intelligence out there is the fact we are here at all. To survey the history of the world from the primordial soup to 8 billion sentient intelligent and sophisticated humans, not to mention the incredibly complex life that sprouted up--and the fact that every strand of DNA in our body is encoded with a set of instructions as thick as the Encyclopedia Britannica just boggles my mind. Given the odds of something like 10 to the 950th power it should not have happened and yet here were are. Yet seemingly we find ourselves alone. Scientists think that in this entire galaxy we are the only life form that has developed to such lengths. The very first humans should have been wiped out by animals or disease but they weren't. Incredible. That is the very definition of a deist God.
I never really considered Creation the best proof of God's existence, but the way you explained the DNA stuff is mind boggling. Please bear in mind that I do not have an academic background in the hard sciences. I studied geography and much later psychology and homeopathy, so I am not scientifically inclined. Although I find science fascinating one only has so much time to study.
I consider the best proof of God's existence to be Messengers of God, and I even started a thread on that a few months ago entitled
What would be evidence that God exists?
It starts out as noted below, and hopefully you will read the rest of it.
"My premise is that Messengers of God are the only real evidence that God exists because they are the evidence that God provides and wants us to look at in order to determine that He exists."
Because I believe in Messengers of God and the religions they establish, I am truly a theist. I said I stand on the border between deism and theism because I really do not know what God is doing or not doing, and that's true, but there is more to it than that. Let's just say I do not share the sentiments about the All-Loving God of those other RF members who are of my religion,
@ adrian009,
@ Tony Bristow-Stagg ,
@ InvestigateTruth , and
@ loverofhumanity.
There are some other sentiments I do not share with those of my religion. I agree that tests have the "potential" to make us stronger and more spiritual, I do not believe that tests are "gifts" from God for which we should thank Him, and I do not believe that if we don't see it this way we are a coward rather than a brave and holy soul. Sorry, I just cannot buy that bill of goods. Admittedly it is probably because most of my life has been suffering, but so what? It is difficult to be grateful to a God who allowed me to suffer through no fault of my own, and even more difficult to love Him, just because the scriptures say I should. Love just does not work that way.
So here we are, you and I, and I think we have a lot in common, the difference being I have a religion and I am certain that God exists.