Says a lot about the power behind the push to keep medicinal cannabis out of the public arena....and out of public awareness.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It should stay banned. Same as cigarettes ads.Says a lot about the power behind the push to keep medicinal cannabis out of the public arena....and out of public awareness.
Says a lot about the power behind the push to keep medicinal cannabis out of the public arena....and out of public awareness.
It wasn't banned (after all, you linked it right here), it was rejected by the independent private broadcaster. I've no doubt it was submitted in full knowledge that it would be rejected to generate exactly this kind of response. The "controversy" or their advert being "banned" will bring them much more of an active response that the advert being shown.Says a lot about the power behind the push to keep medicinal cannabis out of the public arena....and out of public awareness.
While I do think research should go into at least seeing if cannabis is effective in alleviating symptoms, it is technically illegal in many states in the US. I mean it’s like asking why alcohol ads were banned during prohibition. Ads still have to adhere to laws.Says a lot about the power behind the push to keep medicinal cannabis out of the public arena....and out of public awareness.
The ad was likely banned because cannabis is still under federal prohibition, and this has limited research into the effects of this drug. Another factor is that the AMA still considers cannabis to be a "dangerous drug."
"Our AMA believes that (1) cannabis is a dangerous drug and as such is a public health 40 concern..."
https://assets.ama-assn.org/sub/meeting/documents/i16-resolution-907.pdf
It should stay banned. Same as cigarettes ads.
Depends. Are we talking about pharmaceutical products or recreational "get me high" type of cannibis?So in other words a useful medicine should remain buried under the rug because of your own irrational, emotional hang-ups? Because **** those who it could alleviate, right?
Medical cannibis has the THC removed and has legit medical benefits.It wasn't banned (after all, you linked it right here), it was rejected by the independent private broadcaster. I've no doubt it was submitted in full knowledge that it would be rejected to generate exactly this kind of response. The "controversy" or their advert being "banned" will bring them much more of an active response that the advert being shown.
There are indeed people who work to prevent medicinal cannabis from progressing (wrongly IMO) but there are also people working to push it hard because they have a commercial interest in it (as is the case here). We need to find the rational middle ground between the two (through both the ridiculous partisan politics and gross commercialisation of medicine in the US don't help).
Depends. Are we talking about pharmaceutical products or recreational "get me high" type of cannibis?
Depends. Are we talking about pharmaceutical products or recreational "get me high" type of cannibis?
Medical cannibis has the THC removed and has legit medical benefits.
It should stay banned. Same as cigarettes ads.
It should stay banned. Same as cigarettes ads.
I think the ad is misleading. Cannabis treats the symptoms not the disease. If one has a terminal illness, cannabis is not going to change the outcome, but it does allow one to endure with some comfort and dignity.
The ad was likely banned because cannabis is still under federal prohibition, and this has limited research into the effects of this drug. Another factor is that the AMA still considers cannabis to be a "dangerous drug."
"Our AMA believes that (1) cannabis is a dangerous drug and as such is a public health 40 concern..."
https://assets.ama-assn.org/sub/meeting/documents/i16-resolution-907.pdf
As opposed to what?Depends. Are we talking about pharmaceutical products or recreational "get me high" type of cannibis?
And therein lies the problem. The AMA is pressured by the pharmaceutical industry NOT to upset their cash cow. They have literally been able to get away with murder up to now....but the groundswell of public opinion is growing as the truth comes to light. It never was about health....it was about wealth.
This is absolute rubbish! Cannabis is dangerous to big pharma's bottom line. They don't deal in cures, only in "treatments" that will last for the rest of a patient's miserable, side effect ridden, life.
More doctors are educating themselves and seeing the good results of cannabis based medicine...but if it remains illegal, their hands are tied. If they were to recommend any alternative treatment like cannabis, they would lose their licence. This is nothing more than a power trip, designed to keep the cash cow firmly in place. But the jig is up. The truth is out and the medical system is being shown up to be part of a juggernaut of greed and control. If you can't beat 'em, you have to join 'em....but consciences are being bothered. It takes great courage to stand up for the truth when your livelihood is at stake.
This is typical of the system we live in.....so many institutions are being exposed now as having greed as their prime motivator. Capitalism run amok.
"The love of money is the root of all evil"......now more true than ever.
It wasn't banned (after all, you linked it right here), it was rejected by the independent private broadcaster. I've no doubt it was submitted in full knowledge that it would be rejected to generate exactly this kind of response. The "controversy" or their advert being "banned" will bring them much more of an active response that the advert being shown.
There are indeed people who work to prevent medicinal cannabis from progressing (wrongly IMO) but there are also people working to push it hard because they have a commercial interest in it (as is the case here). We need to find the rational middle ground between the two (through both the ridiculous partisan politics and gross commercialisation of medicine in the US don't help).