Jim
Nets of Wonder
“What’s it all about, Alfie? ...”Liberty to pursue our own desires is also part of dominating thought in this age, is that what life is all about?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
“What’s it all about, Alfie? ...”Liberty to pursue our own desires is also part of dominating thought in this age, is that what life is all about?
So who’s the failure, Mr. Snotty?
You can’t “prove” that God exist at all. What kind of rummy response have you provided?
It never was. It was only an abomination to ancient Near East people.
Sorry, but that is a pathetic emotionally based justification. What dehumanizes people is their unnatural sexual activity, driven by lust and a sadly abnormal genetic inheritance.....it is the sexual 'activity' between those people that God described as an "abomination". They can't help their 'attraction', but they can control where it takes them if they have the right motivation. i.e. love for God that is greater than love for self.What you suggest dehumanizes people. God would never wish for that.
God made what and whom God made. And God loves every single one, just as they are.
No these are the responses of someone who is tired of inane and shallow/narrow posts that are blatantly snotty in nature.Are these the responses of someone who has run out of excuses, I wonder? Proud of these, are you....?
It has been scientifically proven that they’re not “against nature.” Medical science has determined that a homosexual orientation is a normal and healthy aspect of humanity.Homosexual acts are against nature
Isn’t that enough? Isn’t the expression of love/desire for whom one loves enough? It is for hetero couples who, for whatever reason cannot — or have decided not — to have children.They serve no purpose but to satisfy sexual desires
But as you said in another post, not entirely.It is primarily for reproduction
which is why we advocate for monogamous, loving, consensual, and committed relationships.But we are not animals and we alone have a sense of morality and laws governing our sexual behavior, which were given to us by the one who created us.
Well... yes God did! Jewish law is not binding on any but Jews.Those laws were not cultural unless you think God only gave them for Israel's benefit....?
Yes. Jesus was a Jew.Did not Jesus abide by those same laws and teach his disciples to respect them
No, it’s what The System does to minorities; dehumanizes them by intimating that they’re “defective” somehow, and not authorized to take part in normal activities that others are authorized to take part in. It’s called “systemic violence.” It was done to Blacks in 18th and 19th century America. It was done to Jews in Germany in the 20th century. It was done to indigenous people of Maryland’s throughout history. It was done to Christians by the Romans. It’s even been done to women. Currently, it’s being done to brown people in america.Sorry, but that is a pathetic emotionally based justification
Loving, consensual, committed sexual relationships are not “unnatural.” Your assessment that these relationships are ‘lust-driven” is false in many, many cases. Homosexuality has been medically shown to be normal. I have no idea where you’re getting your information, but it’s woefully skewed and dangerously bigoted.What dehumanizes people is their unnatural sexual activity, driven by lust and a sadly abnormal genetic inheritance.....it is the sexual 'activity' between those people that God described as an "abomination
Of course God did. The Psalms tell us that God formed us in our mothers’ wombs.This is nonsense! God did not make any of us who we are
Quite correct. God made some people gay, and you’re condemning them for it, on behalf of a God who did not elicit your help.God did not make people gay and then condemn them for it.
No these are the responses of someone who is tired of inane and shallow/narrow posts that are blatantly snotty in nature.
It has been scientifically proven that they’re not “against nature.” Medical science has determined that a homosexual orientation is a normal and healthy aspect of humanity.
Isn’t that enough? Isn’t the expression of love/desire for whom one loves enough? It is for hetero couples who, for whatever reason cannot — or have decided not — to have children.
But as you said in another post, not entirely.
which is why we advocate for monogamous, loving, consensual, and committed relationships.
Well... yes God did! Jewish law is not binding on any but Jews.
Yes. Jesus was a Jew.
No, it’s what The System does to minorities; dehumanizes them by intimating that they’re “defective” somehow, and not authorized to take part in normal activities that others are authorized to take part in. It’s called “systemic violence.” It was done to Blacks in 18th and 19th century America. It was done to Jews in Germany in the 20th century. It was done to indigenous people of Maryland’s throughout history. It was done to Christians by the Romans. It’s even been done to women. Currently, it’s being done to brown people in america.
Loving, consensual, committed sexual relationships are not “unnatural.” Your assessment that these relationships are ‘lust-driven” is false in many, many cases. Homosexuality has been medically shown to be normal. I have no idea where you’re getting your information, but it’s woefully skewed and dangerously bigoted.
Of course God did. The Psalms tell us that God formed us in our mothers’ wombs.
Quite correct. God made some people gay, and you’re condemning them for it, on behalf of a God who did not elicit your help.
Some religions have a bad record for being sexually very repressive. Baha'is, compared to modern society, have some pretty strict beliefs. Like if a person never gets married should they never ever have sex? Even with themselves? If that is so, then I think there will be a lot of people breaking those laws.
“What’s it all about, Alfie? ...”
If you have some reasons to think that those passages were intended to prohibit sexual practices that God forgot to mention in Leviticus 18, I hope that you will post them in this thread:LOL...That is probably because if someone had suggested such a thing they would have been put to death on the spot.
You forget God's Law conveniently.
Leviticus 18:22...Douay-Rheims 1899 American Edition (DRA)
"Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind, because it is an abomination."
What is an abomination? What do "married" people do? What do SS married people do?
If following the Laws of God in the Bible makes one "counterproductive, judgmental, and bigoted", then apparently you are not reading them correctly....I don't think his laws need an interpreter...
Romans 1:24-27 Douay-Rheims 1899 American Edition (DRA)
"24 Wherefore God gave them up to the desires of their heart, unto uncleanness, to dishonour their own bodies among themselves.
25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie; and worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
26 For this cause God delivered them up to shameful affections. For their women have changed the natural use into that use which is against nature.
27 And, in like manner, the men also, leaving the natural use of the women, have burned in their lusts one towards another, men with men working that which is filthy, and receiving in themselves the recompense which was due to their error."
Agreed.Being gay is not the real problem.....its the action, not the attraction.
God and I are juuuust fine.Give your excuses to God and see if he accepts them....I am not your judge.
I think Jesus, if we trust what was written about him, said that the Good Samaritan was the true "neighbor". That would fit in exactly with what you guys are saying. Help people in need with no religious conversion strings attached. But that's not what usually happens. A soup kitchen or a missionary to a far off country might feed the people or build a school or a clinic, but then the people will have to listen to a talk about being saved and turning to Jesus. I really don't think the Christian is going to help those people and keep quiet. You guys seem to be saying that you do keep quiet.
In the old days when I was with the Christians, they told stories of people that went into the bad parts of town and "witnessed" to the gangs. They were not there to accept them for how they were. They were there to share Jesus and get them to turn away from that lifestyle.
And, I heard similar stories from Baha'is. How a Baha'i went into a remote village and told the people about the Baha'i Faith and the whole tribe became Baha'is. So some preaching, or "teaching", about Baha'u'llah must have taken place in a similar way that Christians "share" Jesus with the people.
But that's not what is happening here. Baha'is respond to a thread or start a thread. Their responses give the hair splitting perspective from the Baha'i pov. And the others give their reasons supporting their beliefs and why the Baha'i answer is wrong or has some issues.
That's why I've said a few times that the Baha'is should be the peacemakers in these arguments and not adding fuel to the controversial fire. And, that's gotta be hard... especially for some Baha'is here that seem to thrive on arguing. Naturally, they see as "supporting" and "defending" the Baha'i Faith. But, in doing so, they have pushed people away, rather than drawing them in and being the cause of unity. So keep doing what you're doing. You are definitely on, what I think, is the right path.
Is it still an "abomination" to God? Should gays still be put to death by stoning? Historically, how did Christians handle it? Kill a few? Have the demon of gayness exorcised from them? Shun them? Let them continue amongst them but in secret? To where no one knew they were gay? And, if you believe the Baha'i message, then God still forbids gay people of having sex and getting married. Maybe they won't be killed. But can they truly live their lives out in the open, and do the things they do... have gay pride parades, have gay bars and have gay bath houses... or will they be pushed back in the closet?
Since even the Baha'i have a very conservative (strict) moral code with regards to sex, like don't do it, even with yourself, until you are married to someone of the opposite sex. And then, I'm sure they are expected to get too kinky. But, I'm also sure kinkiness and gayness will continue. So how do Baha'is and Conservative Christians accept that kind of behavior?
God and I are juuuust fine.
We must love all people and there are no exceptions. People’s personal lives are between them and God. Yes laws are there but it’s not for us as individuals to judge others as we have our own shortcomings to work on.
My grandson - who his father claims is a Christian - bragged on social media that he and his wife went into a Buddhist fertility shrine and prayed for a baby. I asked the little toad who he prayed to - Jesus, the Father, or the deceased, portly, decomposed Buddha? He never answered. Pathetic. That generation needs a lot of work before they take over.
Closet Christian: Someone who hopes to go to heaven but is too spiritually-challenged to tell others about Jesus Christ.