Oh you want to continue your folly. So be it.
 
Weren't you the one who called the founder of a major religion a "so called prophet".
 
Uh, am I wrong. They do call him a prophet dont they?
 
That's a bit demeaning, don't you think?
 
Nope. I do not see anything wrong with stating that others call individuals by certain titles even if I do not share in their belief.
 
You then go on to insinuate that any abrahamic religion that that does not observe all of the laws of the torah is making excuses. And then... You ask which laws of the Torah could one not realistically keep.
 
No you are incorrect. I didnt insinuate anything. I stated a cold hard fact as to my understanding. That question is still on the table. Care to answer it for those who seem to shy from it?
 
Does this mean that you keep every single law in the Torah? i.e.
 
If every single law of the Torah were legitimately legal for me to keep then with no doubt I am bound by a covenant to do so.
 
In my understanding the scripture that you have partially posted with some misinterpretations is as follows
Anyone who dreams or prophesizes anything that is against God, or anyone who tries to turn you from God, is to be put to death
~Deuteronomy 13:5
 
And as well
..
 
Stubborn children were to be stoned, and the stoning was to be instigated by their parents
~Deuteronomy 21:18-21
 
Are to my understanding both judgments that can only be enforced within that theocracy in the land of Yisrael, or such land as given to those chosen by Yah my Elohim. See as to my understanding one would have to be in the land given by Yah and then one would have to have judges in place to hand down such judgments and then one would have to have those who have been appointed to carry out such judgments. We dont have that as yet but it is of my understanding that it is going to happen at some point in the future.
 
The eating of fat is prohibited forever
~Leviticus 3:17
 
Lets put the rest of this verse in shall we?
 
Lev 3:17 "'It shall be a perpetual statute throughout your generations in all your dwellings, that you shall eat neither fat nor blood.'"
 
I for one do not consume anything that looks to be either fat nor blood.
 
If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rapes her and they are discovered, he shall pay the girl's father fifty shekels of silver. He must marry the girl, for he has violated her. He can never divorce her as long as he lives
~Deuteronomy 22:28-29
 
Here is what we have as to my understanding as a blatant misrepresentation of the true word of Elohim. This verse in no way insinuates nor states rape. This translation is very, very misleading and disturbing to say the least. As to my understanding I rather like this translation
..
 
Deu 22:28 If a man find a lady who is a virgin, who is not pledged to be married, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found;
Deu 22:29 then the man who lay with her shall give to the lady's father fifty [shekels] of silver, and she shall be his wife, because he has humbled her; he may not put her away all his days.
 
Now to my understanding if one has committed themselves to the will of Yah and does that which is pleasing to his eye then he would follow these precepts and commands for his good as well as the good of those that are his brothers and sisters in the service of Yah our Elohim.
 
Furthermore, to show that the scripture that you posted was a mistranslation as to my understanding we will have to go where it is understood to be talking about rape which is found just above that which you posted
.
 
Deu 22:25 But if the man find the lady who is pledged to be married in the field, and the man
force her, and lie with her; then the man only who lay with her shall die:
Deu 22:26 but to the lady you shall do nothing; there is in the lady no sin worthy of death: for as when a man rises against his neighbor, and kills him, even so is this matter;
Deu 22:27 for he found her in the field, the pledged to be married lady cried, and there was none to save her.
 
As to my understanding you see where it states
force her? In Deu 22:28-29 there is found nothing of the same as to do with rape but being force was not an issue and also that she was not pledged or married to another and being that she did not cry out for help then again there is no such occurrence of rape.
 
Does this mean that you're out killing atheists? And I sure as hell hope your kids aren't stubborn.
 
If you have, by my understanding, been educated as to the true unadulterated word of Yah my Elohim then you would retract what I deem as to my understanding a vile and very scriptural ignorant question.