The Emperor of Mankind
Currently the galaxy's spookiest paraplegic
Listen, the climate here on RF especially among those who criticize Islam is very hostile and at times the arguments go beyond simple constructive criticism. Speaking about arguments, there have been arguments made here by RF'ers concerning Islam by associating fanaticism with the Holy Qur'an along with the actions of Muslims (good or bad) so in essence my comment about Muslims being synonymous with Islam, in essence it does make sense because this environment (On RF) has done that.
So what about the times when people have explained to you this isn't what they're doing and that they don't think all or most Muslims believe x, y or z? At least half the time saying people on RF are stereotyping most Muslims when they criticise Islam or parts of Islam is putting words in their mouths and creating strawmen. It's actually quite disingenuous. Take my thread on statue of Guan Yu in Indonesia being covered up under threat of destruction by a relative handful of Indonesian Muslims for instance. In that thread I correctly identified the culprits as being followers of Islam. When someone said they thought I was accusing most Muslims there of being behind this I said I wasn't because, well, that's not what the source I used said. Even after I explained this I still had people accusing me of tarring all or most Muslims with the same brush. These strawmen also do nothing to address the fact aniconism is an Islamic belief which has a tendency to progress into iconoclasm.
When I talk about not all Muslims are bad is because I take confounding variables when it comes to behavior. When Palestinians attack Jews I do not take them as doing such acts in the name of Islam, but a historical socio-political conflict that has spanned for decades.
Fair enough. Saying Islam is the only factor would be massively disingenuous. That said, can you at least admit it's a partial factor in motivating the conflict?
When I see Indonesian Muslims Chinese Buddhist, I do not take it as something that is commanded to them to do such things, I consider not only the cultural climate, but socio-political factors as well.
Okay, that's fair enough. So does this mean you admit that Islamic belief regarding 'idols' is also a factor in the situation with the Guan Yu statue?
There are a lot of ignorant and impressionable people in all faiths who are easily swayed by so called "clerics" who they themselves can convince a large swath of a population that such and such action is mandated in a Holy book. Similarly, you have non-Muslims ignorant of the Arabic language and the different times Muhammad received revelation, yet will pick up an English language copy of the Qur'an and will read a verse like "kill them wherever you find them" and would assume that verse is the summation of Islam. So my point is people need to consider various factors and not simply look at things in relation to the actions of Muslims or Islam itself for face value. If that were the case then I could judge humanity as one evil virus that needs to be wiped out if I were to judge everything I see for face value.
You make a fair point here. Though I have noticed you go out of your way to dismiss Islamic belief as a valid contributing factor (along side these others) to problems when claiming so is valid. Do you think that's fair, honest or reasonable?
Last edited: