Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Why is there a crazy notion that the disciples were only sent to the Jews; when Jesus said go forth spreading the good news and Paul was sent to the gentiles?
Peter disagreed ? Cite book and verse please.That Paul was the Apostle to the Gentiles was decided at the so-called Jerusalem Council. Peter disagreed. Interestingly, I think every time both Paul and Peter are mentioned together, Peter's name is always first.
Do we really know that it was Thomas? Paul is the message.Why is there a crazy notion that the disciples were only sent to the Jews; when Jesus said go forth spreading the good news and Paul was sent to the gentiles? Didn't Thomas go to India?
How would you know ? You haven a clue as to what Christianity even is.Paul is what's wrong with Christianity
How would you know ? You haven a clue as to what Christianity even is.
How would you know ? You haven a clue as to what Christianity even is.
I watched a documentary about Thomas. I think he went to the synogogues in India, and what I have seen and heard about it meshes well with Mark 16 which says that the 12 successfully preach the gospel throughout the world. The twelve go and preach throughout all the world, but that doesn't include the gentiles. They ignore gentiles although the gospel is for the benefit of gentiles. So the 'World' in that case is the world of the Jews. Paul then is at first doing the same thing, trying to get other Jews into his wagon and can't get them on board. He then stops doing that and decides to go directly as an apostle to gentiles, starting from scratch.Why is there a crazy notion that the disciples were only sent to the Jews; when Jesus said go forth spreading the good news and Paul was sent to the gentiles? Didn't Thomas go to India?
I don't think soPaul is what's wrong with Christianity
I don't think so.I do, and he’s right.
and why do you suppose Paul's counsel became more important than that of the council's?That Paul was the Apostle to the Gentiles was decided at the so-called Jerusalem Council. Peter disagreed. Interestingly, I think every time both Paul and Peter are mentioned together, Peter's name is always first.
Do we really know that it was Thomas? Paul is the message.
I watched a documentary about Thomas. I think he went to the synogogues in India, and what I have seen and heard about it meshes well with Mark 16 which says that the 12 successfully preach the gospel throughout the world. The twelve go and preach throughout all the world, but that doesn't include the gentiles. They ignore gentiles although the gospel is for the benefit of gentiles. So the 'World' in that case is the world of the Jews. Paul then is at first doing the same thing, trying to get other Jews into his wagon and can't get them on board. He then stops doing that and decides to go directly as an apostle to gentiles, starting from scratch.
Unfortunately all we have are some of his letters and have to reconstruct whatever the basics were. He would say things in his letters like "You already know what I taught...and do I have come over there and teach it, again to you toddlers?" We don't have whatever that was that he originally taught them. I would guess he taught them basic Judaism of some sort. They also all depended on the synagogues and would there to be taught things, so we do have an idea of what those basics were. We just don't have them in Paul's words.
I don't think so.
If I was still a Christian, I would say Paul followed a false Christ. He believed when the instructions were not to believe anybody that he was Christ, until the second return.I don't think so
I don't think you read that scripture right:If I was still a Christian, I would say Paul followed a false Christ. He believed when the instructions were not to believe anybody that he was Christ, until the second return.
Matthew 24:23
Yes... but the person just said statements without support.You’re entitled to.
No, your conclusions, are very erroneous.I watched a documentary about Thomas. I think he went to the synogogues in India, and what I have seen and heard about it meshes well with Mark 16 which says that the 12 successfully preach the gospel throughout the world. The twelve go and preach throughout all the world, but that doesn't include the gentiles. They ignore gentiles although the gospel is for the benefit of gentiles. So the 'World' in that case is the world of the Jews. Paul then is at first doing the same thing, trying to get other Jews into his wagon and can't get them on board. He then stops doing that and decides to go directly as an apostle to gentiles, starting from scratch.
Unfortunately all we have are some of his letters and have to reconstruct whatever the basics were. He would say things in his letters like "You already know what I taught...and do I have come over there and teach it, again to you toddlers?" We don't have whatever that was that he originally taught them. I would guess he taught them basic Judaism of some sort. They also all depended on the synagogues and would there to be taught things, so we do have an idea of what those basics were. We just don't have them in Paul's words.