• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why Are Some Cartoons Great, While Others Are Boring?

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
First, to those of you who might demand this thread be in TV or movies.....
Pbbbbtttttt!
Great cartoons are theater, ranging from vaudeville
to opera with fat ladies & helmets with horns.
One of my favorite directors (up there with Hitchcock
& others) is Chuck Jones. What's so great? Watch.

There have been new cartoons with his characters.
But without him, they've been disappointingly pedestrian.
 

Brickjectivity

wind and rain touch not this brain
Staff member
Premium Member
First, to those of you who might demand this thread be in TV or movies.....
Pbbbbtttttt!
Great cartoons are theater, ranging from vaudeville
to opera with fat ladies & helmets with horns.
One of my favorite directors (up there with Hitchcock
& others) is Chuck Jones. What's so great? Watch.

There have been new cartoons with his characters.
But without him, they've been disappointingly pedestrian.
Cool video!
 

Wu Wei

ursus senum severiorum and ex-Bisy Backson
Why Are Some Cartoons Great, While Others Are Boring?

just cuz
 

ecco

Veteran Member
First, to those of you who might demand this thread be in TV or movies.....
Pbbbbtttttt!
Great cartoons are theater, ranging from vaudeville
to opera with fat ladies & helmets with horns.
One of my favorite directors (up there with Hitchcock
& others) is Chuck Jones. What's so great? Watch.

There have been new cartoons with his characters.
But without him, they've been disappointingly pedestrian.
Great video. Thanks.
 

sealchan

Well-Known Member
I agree with what the video says...I suspect that many career "artists" learn how to emulate a form of expression but they lack the inspiration from their own deep interests or even the insight into the human experience that the originator has/had. This applies to any creative production that found success with its originator but was found lacking with its "continuer".
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
First, to those of you who might demand this thread be in TV or movies.....
Pbbbbtttttt!
Great cartoons are theater, ranging from vaudeville
to opera with fat ladies & helmets with horns.
One of my favorite directors (up there with Hitchcock
& others) is Chuck Jones. What's so great? Watch.

There have been new cartoons with his characters.
But without him, they've been disappointingly pedestrian.

Do you remember Clutch Cargo? The way they did the animation with the stationary cartoons and the moving mouths always kind of freaked me out as a kid.

 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Do you remember Clutch Cargo? The way they did the animation with the stationary cartoons and the moving mouths always kind of freaked me out as a kid.

Of course I remember Clutch, Spinner & Paddlefoot!
They animated the mouths that way to save money.
It might be the cheapest cartoon ever made.
Makes even South Park look professional.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I’ve never heard of any of this. You are really old.
Other coders & still get a laugh from how bad Clutch Cargo was.
In the 1950s Detroit area, it was often a choice between that
or Curling from Canuckistan (channel 9) or Mass For Shut-Ins.
Yes, those really existed on TV.

Now, get off'n me lawn, ya dang young whippersnapper!
 

ecco

Veteran Member
Back then Mel Blanc, in relative obscurity, did the voices for hundreds of characters.

Now high paid movie actors and comedians and singers do one voice.
 

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
I deeply admire the "old men of WB."
The classic Looney Tunes will always be among my favourite animations ever.
But things change. Animation changes. Comedy changes. Audience tastes change.
Sometimes that means the content will suffer. Sometimes it will be better. Sometimes it will even inspire the next generation.
Animaniacs arguably recapture or at least come close to the original spirit of their forefathers.
Where would (old) Simpsons be without Flintstones. Would we have Rick and Morty without the success of Futurama (older seasons.)
Bo Jack Horseman is a critical darling.
Things aren't worse or better. They're just.....different.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
True. I was thinking more about big budget movies like Toy Story and Lion King.
Aye, those things seem more about attracting big names
to boost box office receipts. But TV cartoons are more
numerous & low budget. Also, versatile actors often work
with the same directors on different shows.

In a related arena, I like how movie directors hire the same
composers repeatedly. Can you imagine a Hitchcock movie
witout a Bernard Herrmann score? Or Tim Burton without
Danny Elfman? Oh, the horror!
 
Top