ecco
Veteran Member
The point in question is whether or not we get your ultra-right political leanings, yeah, we get it.No, actually... Ya don't...
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The point in question is whether or not we get your ultra-right political leanings, yeah, we get it.No, actually... Ya don't...
Actually, yes you do. We learn that the sun is hot through logical induction. It's a conclusion formed via examining facts.By using the logic and sense of the brain... For instance, I don't need a foreign conscious network to tell me that the sun is hot and produces heat.
You just described reaching a conclusion by examining facts (I.e: an opinion which IS substantiated, albeit not with a very rational conclusion, since your conclusion is based on a false premise, but it's still a conclusion BASED ON something you observe). What you're describing is the exact opposite of what you said earlier.I also was able to figure out that Trees are not made solely from minerals in the soil, I was able to figure out on my own that this wasn't true, because there are not giant potholes at the base of large trees... Trees gain the majority of their mas by extracting carbon molecules from the air.
The point in question is whether or not we get your ultra-right political leanings, yeah, we get it.
Can you identify what makes them "radical leftists"?Oh okay... There are no radical left wing extremists... Not a single one...
Is that really your position?
...I guess William van Spronson, Conner Betts, Michael Forest Reinoehl, and Blake David Hampe don't exist in your imagination.
Please, tell us more about how the Proud Boys are fine people with good ideas.If that's how you want to categorize me. Personally I have no political chains... No ties to any party, I just use logic that is superior to most others. Really, you should just follow me if you're in need of political guidance. just kidding.
Can you identify what makes them "radical leftists"?
Please, tell us more about how the Proud Boys are fine people with good ideas.
Actually, yes you do. We learn that the sun is hot through logical induction. It's a conclusion formed via examining facts.
You just described reaching a conclusion by examining facts (I.e: an opinion which IS substantiated, albeit not with a very rational conclusion, since your conclusion is based on a false premise, but it's still a conclusion BASED ON something you observe). What you're describing is the exact opposite of what you said earlier.
You sure don't answer any of mine.You sure do ask a lot of questions...
Inventing stuff seems to be more in your wheelhouse, not mine.No. Stop trying to get me to do things for you, and come up with your own stuff...
Come on, we can all tell you're not. Be honest for a change.I'm sorry you're not satisfied with my answer.
You sure don't answer any of mine.
Inventing stuff seems to be more in your wheelhouse, not mine..
Come on, we can all tell you're not. Be honest for a change.
But that has nothing to do with whether or not you believe things for good reasons. You were told the sun was hot because the facts indicated it. You were informed of a substantiated belief. You didn't Intuit a correct answer.Actually, I learned that the sun was hot when I was 3, before I knew what facts were.
That's called substantiation.I'm sorry you're not satisfied with my answer.
To clarify, I don’t think any decision or conclusion I've ever come to has been a result of anything other than my environment or previous experiences... I'm not sure what you assume an "unsubstantiated opinion" actually is by definition. My understanding is that it's a conclusion based on an array of personal perspectives, typically from previous feelings or thoughts stored within our minds from prior experiences and environmental observations...
I suppose I could credit you with astonishing creativity for coming up with your particular brand of surrealist political storytelling.What a shame. Though innovative thinking does take time to master, so I can understand how that's difficult for some to come to terms with and appreciate.
Indeed, you've grasped it perfectly - the best way for you to never lose a debate is to make statements so nonsensical and devoid of meaningful information so as to render any potential questions pointless. And you're already employing that insight to great effect!I'm familiar with many debate methods, it's not my first rodeo... The more questions you ask, the more opportunities you get to critique... It keeps you always on the offense and me always on the defense.
But you evidently don't like it when you have to substantiate your ramblings with supporting evidence, so a traditional fact's based debate based on reasoning would be right out.I prefer a debate where people exchange ideas equally, where one person is not constantly asking questions of another and then complaining when the other doesn't want to play along.
Indeed, you've grasped it perfectly - the best way for you to never lose a debate is to make statements so nonsensical and devoid of meaningful information so as to render any potential questions pointless. And you're already employing that insight to great effect!
But you evidently don't like it when you have to substantiate your ramblings with supporting evidence, so a traditional fact's based debate based on reasoning would be right out.
I suppose I could credit you with astonishing creativity for coming up with your particular brand of surrealist political storytelling.
You've never actually debated me, so LOL about your "experiences". You really are a gifted storyteller and jokester extraordinaire.Thing is, I go into pretty extreme detail in my posts already... So excessive one-sided questions become extra burdensome. And again, there's absolutely zero benefit to me in doing so. And to take it a step further, I highly doubt extra information will be accepted in kind by you... Typically, from my experiences, you tend to use everything I say against me (or at least try to).
Actually, you probably didn't know the word but you knew if it was really day or night outside, and would know if someone saying it daytime was being truthful or not. If it was night time, without knowing the word fact you still would have known it was night time because the sun was down.Actually, I learned that the sun was hot when I was 3, before I knew what facts were.