Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber
Then what of all the verses that basically declare I should be put to death, or have been put to death at certain times? They're in there.Try the ones that do not want to harm you. That's a great start.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Then what of all the verses that basically declare I should be put to death, or have been put to death at certain times? They're in there.Try the ones that do not want to harm you. That's a great start.
Kindly refer to my posts #7 & 15, and show how in any of those two post I infer that other people must be dominated. I specifically mention that this is a perversion of things.So can you demonstrate as FACT that prior to your Biblical quote that other members are simply meant to be dominated?
2) "Thats war, not ethnic cleansing. When someone is actively trying to kill you, you are allowed to defend yourself. Moses spared the virgins because of how the disease that was spread. Only virgins were deemed safe from infection."
-- Referring to virginal infants. Sheer idiocy. Again, these were civilians.
3) You provided justification for killing civilians and infants. False?
Nothing I said demonstrated any reason to abuse other people or races. So, instead of coming down on me in general, what specifically did you not agree with?
Kindly refer to my posts #7 & 15, and show how in any of those two post I infer that other people must be dominated. I specifically mention that this is a perversion of things.
It is irritating as hell to be accused of something that I am dead set against and do not think I have said anywhere.
Then what of all the verses that basically declare I should be put to death, or have been put to death at certain times? They're in there.
I believe that most people selectively read scriptures to confirm their biases.I see. So you believe they ignore the majority of it and follow the rest?
I took it for granted that a society familiar with the German extermination camps would be familiar with this so abominable terminology. I guess I was wrong. Well, at least it made you learn a common theme of this kind of philosophy."untermensch" meant, of course I had to ask a friend who is fluent in German and apparently it means "subhuman creature."
Thought this was common knowledge.Ok, no big deal but what I call ignorance in that post was the fact that you made a claim regarding social evolution without supporting your views with facts. Therefore, I can only interpret your views as assuming as opposed to supporting it with evidence. European colonialism was not based on evolution as evolution implies a certain biological trait that holds an advantage based on environmental climate, surrounds etcetera.
Maybe you should study history also. The affect on society this teaching had was far reaching. I have left enough material in the previous post to demonstrate this. That a mixture of Christian Evolutionary teaching happened in these times seem indicated. That the results were horrific is obvious...As someone who studies science it is also irritating as hell to have people misuse evolution to prove an ignorant point.
I took it for granted that a society familiar with the German extermination camps would be familiar with this so abominable terminology. I guess I was wrong. Well, at least it made you learn a common theme of this kind of philosophy.
Thought this was common knowledge.
Quote source:
Germans first reached the arid shores of southwestern Africa in the mid-1800s. . . .
. . .
German researchers treated Africans as mere test subjects. Papers published in German medical journals used skull measurements to justify calling Africans Untermenschen—subhumans. “Skeletons were brought here,” says Kaunatjike. “Graves were robbed.”
Read more: A Brutal Genocide in Colonial Africa Finally Gets its Deserved Recognition | History | Smithsonian
Give the gift of Smithsonian magazine for only $12! Give the gift of Smithsonian
Follow us: @SmithsonianMag on Twitter
A Brutal Genocide in Colonial Africa Finally Gets its Deserved Recognition | History | Smithsonian
Britain:
During the Second Boer War (1899-1902), the British rounded up around a sixth of the Boer population - mainly women and children - and detained them in camps, which were overcrowded and prone to outbreaks of disease, with scant food rations.
Of the 107,000 people interned in the camps, 27,927 Boers died, along with an unknown number of black Africans.
The five worst atrocities carried out by the British Empire will make you wonder why we're apparently proud of it
-------------
When peaceful protesters defied a government order and demonstrated against British colonial rule in Amritsar, India, on 13 April 1919, they were blocked inside the walled Jallianwala Gardens and fired upon by Gurkha soldiers.
The soldiers, under the orders of Brigadier Reginald Dyer, kept firing until they ran out of ammunition, killing between 379 and 1,000 protesters and injuring another 1,100 within 10 minutes.
Brigadier Dyer was later lauded a hero by the British public, who raised £26,000 for him as a thank you.
-----------
Thousands of elderly Kenyans, who claim British colonial forces mistreated, raped and tortured them during the Mau Mau Uprising (1951-1960), have launched a £200m damages claim against the UK Government.
Members of the Kikuyu tribe were detained in camps, since described as "Britain's gulags" or concentration camps, where they allege they were systematically tortured and suffered serious sexual assault.
Estimates of the deaths vary widely: historian David Anderson estimates there were 20,000, whereas Caroline Elkins believes up to 100,000 could have died.
Instead of posting an insult as a way of communicating, If there are things you would like explained, ask. Some of this information I expected most to be familiar with. In one of the posts, I think I left the link to a Wikipedia article on the subject, or was it another similar post? I forget.
The following article displays the dirty underwear of Britain:
Link: How Britain Denies its Holocaust
Britain and genocide
In the following book, page 687, Darwin's influence on these actions is clearly demonstrated. First two paragraphs. So, while many of these influential individuals counted themselves good Christians, they also embraced that people in their colonies were "evolutionary inferior."
Western Civilization: Beyond Boundaries, Volume II: Since 1560
I took it for granted that a society familiar with the German extermination camps would be familiar with this so abominable terminology. I guess I was wrong. Well, at least it made you learn a common theme of this kind of philosophy.
Thought this was common knowledge.
Quote source:
Germans first reached the arid shores of southwestern Africa in the mid-1800s. . . .
. . .
German researchers treated Africans as mere test subjects. Papers published in German medical journals used skull measurements to justify calling Africans Untermenschen—subhumans. “Skeletons were brought here,” says Kaunatjike. “Graves were robbed.”
Read more: A Brutal Genocide in Colonial Africa Finally Gets its Deserved Recognition | History | Smithsonian
Give the gift of Smithsonian magazine for only $12! Give the gift of Smithsonian
Follow us: @SmithsonianMag on Twitter
A Brutal Genocide in Colonial Africa Finally Gets its Deserved Recognition | History | Smithsonian
Britain:
During the Second Boer War (1899-1902), the British rounded up around a sixth of the Boer population - mainly women and children - and detained them in camps, which were overcrowded and prone to outbreaks of disease, with scant food rations.
Of the 107,000 people interned in the camps, 27,927 Boers died, along with an unknown number of black Africans.
The five worst atrocities carried out by the British Empire will make you wonder why we're apparently proud of it
-------------
When peaceful protesters defied a government order and demonstrated against British colonial rule in Amritsar, India, on 13 April 1919, they were blocked inside the walled Jallianwala Gardens and fired upon by Gurkha soldiers.
The soldiers, under the orders of Brigadier Reginald Dyer, kept firing until they ran out of ammunition, killing between 379 and 1,000 protesters and injuring another 1,100 within 10 minutes.
Brigadier Dyer was later lauded a hero by the British public, who raised £26,000 for him as a thank you.
-----------
Thousands of elderly Kenyans, who claim British colonial forces mistreated, raped and tortured them during the Mau Mau Uprising (1951-1960), have launched a £200m damages claim against the UK Government.
Members of the Kikuyu tribe were detained in camps, since described as "Britain's gulags" or concentration camps, where they allege they were systematically tortured and suffered serious sexual assault.
Estimates of the deaths vary widely: historian David Anderson estimates there were 20,000, whereas Caroline Elkins believes up to 100,000 could have died.
Instead of posting an insult as a way of communicating, If there are things you would like explained, ask. Some of this information I expected most to be familiar with. In one of the posts, I think I left the link to a Wikipedia article on the subject, or was it another similar post? I forget.
The following article displays the dirty underwear of Britain:
Link: How Britain Denies its Holocaust
Britain and genocide
In the following book, page 687, Darwin's influence on these actions is clearly demonstrated. First two paragraphs. So, while many of these influential individuals counted themselves good Christians, they also embraced that people in their colonies were "evolutionary inferior."
Western Civilization: Beyond Boundaries, Volume II: Since 1560
I took it for granted that a society familiar with the German extermination camps would be familiar with this so abominable terminology. I guess I was wrong. Well, at least it made you learn a common theme of this kind of philosophy.
Thought this was common knowledge.
Quote source:
Germans first reached the arid shores of southwestern Africa in the mid-1800s. . . .
. . .
German researchers treated Africans as mere test subjects. Papers published in German medical journals used skull measurements to justify calling Africans Untermenschen—subhumans. “Skeletons were brought here,” says Kaunatjike. “Graves were robbed.”
Read more: A Brutal Genocide in Colonial Africa Finally Gets its Deserved Recognition | History | Smithsonian
Give the gift of Smithsonian magazine for only $12! Give the gift of Smithsonian
Follow us: @SmithsonianMag on Twitter
A Brutal Genocide in Colonial Africa Finally Gets its Deserved Recognition | History | Smithsonian
Britain:
During the Second Boer War (1899-1902), the British rounded up around a sixth of the Boer population - mainly women and children - and detained them in camps, which were overcrowded and prone to outbreaks of disease, with scant food rations.
Of the 107,000 people interned in the camps, 27,927 Boers died, along with an unknown number of black Africans.
The five worst atrocities carried out by the British Empire will make you wonder why we're apparently proud of it
-------------
When peaceful protesters defied a government order and demonstrated against British colonial rule in Amritsar, India, on 13 April 1919, they were blocked inside the walled Jallianwala Gardens and fired upon by Gurkha soldiers.
The soldiers, under the orders of Brigadier Reginald Dyer, kept firing until they ran out of ammunition, killing between 379 and 1,000 protesters and injuring another 1,100 within 10 minutes.
Brigadier Dyer was later lauded a hero by the British public, who raised £26,000 for him as a thank you.
-----------
Thousands of elderly Kenyans, who claim British colonial forces mistreated, raped and tortured them during the Mau Mau Uprising (1951-1960), have launched a £200m damages claim against the UK Government.
Members of the Kikuyu tribe were detained in camps, since described as "Britain's gulags" or concentration camps, where they allege they were systematically tortured and suffered serious sexual assault.
Estimates of the deaths vary widely: historian David Anderson estimates there were 20,000, whereas Caroline Elkins believes up to 100,000 could have died.
Instead of posting an insult as a way of communicating, If there are things you would like explained, ask. Some of this information I expected most to be familiar with. In one of the posts, I think I left the link to a Wikipedia article on the subject, or was it another similar post? I forget.
The following article displays the dirty underwear of Britain:
Link: How Britain Denies its Holocaust
Britain and genocide
In the following book, page 687, Darwin's influence on these actions is clearly demonstrated. First two paragraphs. So, while many of these influential individuals counted themselves good Christians, they also embraced that people in their colonies were "evolutionary inferior."
Western Civilization: Beyond Boundaries, Volume II: Since 1560
I took it for granted that a society familiar with the German extermination camps would be familiar with this so abominable terminology. I guess I was wrong. Well, at least it made you learn a common theme of this kind of philosophy.
Thought this was common knowledge.
Quote source:
Germans first reached the arid shores of southwestern Africa in the mid-1800s. . . .
. . .
German researchers treated Africans as mere test subjects. Papers published in German medical journals used skull measurements to justify calling Africans Untermenschen—subhumans. “Skeletons were brought here,” says Kaunatjike. “Graves were robbed.”
Read more: A Brutal Genocide in Colonial Africa Finally Gets its Deserved Recognition | History | Smithsonian
Give the gift of Smithsonian magazine for only $12! Give the gift of Smithsonian
Follow us: @SmithsonianMag on Twitter
A Brutal Genocide in Colonial Africa Finally Gets its Deserved Recognition | History | Smithsonian
Britain:
During the Second Boer War (1899-1902), the British rounded up around a sixth of the Boer population - mainly women and children - and detained them in camps, which were overcrowded and prone to outbreaks of disease, with scant food rations.
Of the 107,000 people interned in the camps, 27,927 Boers died, along with an unknown number of black Africans.
The five worst atrocities carried out by the British Empire will make you wonder why we're apparently proud of it
-------------
When peaceful protesters defied a government order and demonstrated against British colonial rule in Amritsar, India, on 13 April 1919, they were blocked inside the walled Jallianwala Gardens and fired upon by Gurkha soldiers.
The soldiers, under the orders of Brigadier Reginald Dyer, kept firing until they ran out of ammunition, killing between 379 and 1,000 protesters and injuring another 1,100 within 10 minutes.
Brigadier Dyer was later lauded a hero by the British public, who raised £26,000 for him as a thank you.
-----------
Thousands of elderly Kenyans, who claim British colonial forces mistreated, raped and tortured them during the Mau Mau Uprising (1951-1960), have launched a £200m damages claim against the UK Government.
Members of the Kikuyu tribe were detained in camps, since described as "Britain's gulags" or concentration camps, where they allege they were systematically tortured and suffered serious sexual assault.
Estimates of the deaths vary widely: historian David Anderson estimates there were 20,000, whereas Caroline Elkins believes up to 100,000 could have died.
Instead of posting an insult as a way of communicating, If there are things you would like explained, ask. Some of this information I expected most to be familiar with. In one of the posts, I think I left the link to a Wikipedia article on the subject, or was it another similar post? I forget.
The following article displays the dirty underwear of Britain:
Link: How Britain Denies its Holocaust
Britain and genocide
In the following book, page 687, Darwin's influence on these actions is clearly demonstrated. First two paragraphs. So, while many of these influential individuals counted themselves good Christians, they also embraced that people in their colonies were "evolutionary inferior."
Western Civilization: Beyond Boundaries, Volume II: Since 1560
So you think because the Jewish people demand Jesus be crucified that their able to explain it away?
Frankly, the piece on German colony policy and British was telling as it was.No explain sociological evolution in relation to European colonialism, and back it up with scientific facts...This is simple.
The idea of racial supremacy is not just frowned upon in the Orthodox Church, it's a condemned heresy.So I watched a documentary about the KKK on netflix a while back and it got me thinking about a couple of things. Manley because majority of the people they showed on the documentary were fervent believers in God. They even held a 'church service' so to speak.
But that really doesn't make sense. Because the Christian-Judaeo God really favors the Jewish people. There's a whole part of the bible in which he demands the death of anyone who tries to oppose his people. Also the fact that their savior is descended from a long line of Jewish family. Since they hate people of Jewish decent too.
So does anyone have a opinion on the matter. I'm only asking because I'm curious.
You haven't provided anything that links Darwin to it. The idea of evolution was around way before Charles Darwin.If you don't think this is facts or evidence, then provide evidence for the contrary.
I supplied the boom that shows that "evolutionary inferiority"; also, the subhuman concept, and the book that was quoted and shows how the downgrading of native peoples permitted their killing and confiscation of property. I think I supplied quite a bit to demonstrate how this caused historical killings on a grand scale in many places. While I think many who embraced this kind of policies mixed Christian and Evolutionary dogma to profit from their killing - is part of those time periods. Today, atheism has crystallized into a clearer detached belief system than previously.You haven't provided anything that links Darwin to it. The idea of evolution was around way before Charles Darwin.
There is almost always a rationale behind hate although often it is somewhat idiotic.
I supplied the boom that shows that "evolutionary inferiority"; also, the subhuman concept, and the book that was quoted and shows how the downgrading of native peoples permitted their killing and confiscation of property. I think I supplied quite a bit to demonstrate how this caused historical killings on a grand scale in many places.