Native
Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist
Thanks. Why these different numbers of the same object/subject? Aren´t the ancient sources/authors talking of the same object? And how can anybody measure the "height of the North Pole Axis"? This doesn´t seem very likely, does it.1. Dimensions' :
There seems to be a big disconnect on the dimensions of this mountain in various ancient texts:
The concept of a Meru mountain at the north pole, also called Sumeru mountain, is found in the Mahabharata, Puranas, Jain Cosmology and in Aryabhatta. Using the Aryabhatiyan scale for yojanas, the dimensions of Meru are:
Mahabharata : 193 km inside the earth’s surface, 1017 km above.
Puranas : 193776 km inside the earth’s surface, 823548 km above.
Jain Cosmology : 12111 km inside the earth’s surface, 1198989 km above.
Aryabhatta : Cylindrical in shape, of height 12 km and diameter 12 km
Out of the above Aryabhatta's reference seems some what imaginable, while the rest aren't.
The term, "the Cosmic Ocean", what does that mean? And we have to find a mountain, around which "The Sun along with all the planets circle".§ 1. Geographical – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Meru#Geographical
The dimensions attributed to Mount Meru, all references to it being as a part of the Cosmic Ocean, with several statements that say, "The Sun along with all the planets circle the mountain," make determining its location most difficult, according to most scholars.
Some researchers identify Mount Meru or Sumeru with the Pamirs, northwest of Kashmir
In the Suryasiddhanta mentions that Mt. Meru lies in 'the middle of the Earth' ("bhurva-madhya") in the land of the Jambunad (Jambudvip). Narpatijayacharyā, a ninth-century text, based on mostly unpublished texts of Yāmal Tantr, mentions "Sumeruḥ Prithvī-madhye shrūyate drishyate na tu" ('Su-meru is heard to be in the middle of the Earth, but is not seen there'). Vārāhamihira, in his Panch-siddhāntikā, claims Mt. Meru to be at the North Pole (though no mountain exists there). Suryasiddhānt, however, mentions a Mt. Meru in the middle of Earth, besides a Sumeru and a Kumeru at both the Poles.
If there is uncertainty about the Earth Axis numbers and they possibly cannot describe the North Pole, we have to find another center around which the Solar system orbits.
Ancient myths (of Creation) is to me real cosmological knowledge, so IMO we of course can use all the available measurements and observations of modern astronomy and cosmology.
The mythical term, "The Primeval Waters" represents to me the vaste void in the Universe. (Modern science have measured "the heavenly waters" to contain about 99 % hydrogen and helium (and other gaseous elements) = "watery elements" and the rest is "metallic elements".
When these elements are set in motions in the creation stories, this motion creates "rivers in the Sky", as for instants the Milky Way River. This Milky Way River can be observed in the night Sky as a whitish vaulting band in the darker period of the seasons, seemingly revolving around the pole star like the other stars. Link - http://www.native-science.net/NorthPole.Centre.htm
So here ve have a connection to the celestial Cosmic Ocean in the myth as well as to the celestial pole or Earth axis.
The only question left is the measurement of the height of this axis of rotation. How would you measure the height of this axis? Besides this, one cannot physically observe the sun and all the planets around the Earth axis. And the geographical interpretation of "the sun and all planets orbiting a terrestrial montain" should be abandoned as impossible.
I think we have to set our focus on the Milky Way River and its mythical telling.
Last edited: